Hi Tim,
I agree it should get moved out of the imap namespace. I delayed that
to make it not do complicated by just introduce another dependency on
a mini-library. But yeah its something we should do...
Bye,
Norman
2010/5/29 Tim-Christian Mundt d...@tim-erwin.de:
Hi,
since both IMAP and
Hey,
when doing this, we could as well unify the artifact names. We have
names like
apache-james-imap-* (both, apache and james)
james-server-* (only james)
apache-mailet-* (only apache)
I'm aware that this is no particularly helpful/urgent contribution of
mine, but in the long term consistency
Hi,
for keeping a log of my GSOC project and gathering all related material
(including source code) I set up a Trac: http://maildir.tim-erwin.de/
There's not too much going on, yet, however, this will change soon.
I did some research on the file transaction stuff and javamaildir.
a) The
Hi,
I also personally found that the 2 mentioned goals would be fine before
3.0 release:
1.- Migrate imap projects/packages to store and protocol.
2.- Uniform the current apache-... james-... namings.
And, yes, in the middle-term, it would be much cleaner.
Now, when you talk about
Hi Tim,
comments inside...
2010/5/29 Tim-Christian Mundt d...@tim-erwin.de:
Hi,
for keeping a log of my GSOC project and gathering all related material
(including source code) I set up a Trac: http://maildir.tim-erwin.de/
There's not too much going on, yet, however, this will change soon.
