On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
dnsmasq on lo only and point bind to the use lo as the forwarder. This
requires dnsmasq to listen on 127.0.0.1 and bind on 172.18.0.1. The
resolv.conf.in file wound need to be removed from git, so the OS could
manage resolv.conf
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Rodolfo D. rodolfo.arc...@gmail.com wrote:
I vote in favor of dnsmasq..
We all do. But I am leaning seriously towards F11.
speaking of F11.. we read some issues regarding F9, and the whole
infrastructure needed to build it.. I must admit that i understood less
On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 18:01 +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
I was thinking of a clean way to introduce the forward nameserver
info
for the nameservice that the XS provides. The nice way that dnsmasq uses
I like
I vote in favor of dnsmasq..
speaking of F11.. we read some issues regarding F9, and the whole
infrastructure needed to build it.. I must admit that i understood less than
half of it.. is it related to the F9 base, or is it more related to XS
issues?
cheers.. R
2009/10/4 Jerry Vonau
