On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:54 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
If you aren't going to place school servers in the actual schools,
and insist on
centralizing them, the hardware recommended by Sameer is a good idea.
+1 -- also, Dev Moharty's suggestion is good: run one XS for each
Daniel Drake wrote:
2009/3/9 Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org:
We will have roughly 8+ AP's. We have found that off-the-shelf AP's can
handle around 60-70 users. But that doesn't still doesn't solve the
problem of the XO's getting bogged down by tons of ejabberd chatter.
DSD: do you have any
, 10 March 2009 11:29 PM
To: Daniel Drake
Cc: server-devel
Subject: Re: [Server-devel] Serving 400+ students w/ a single central XS -
ejabberd nightmare?
Daniel Drake wrote:
2009/3/9 Bryan Berry mailto:br...@olenepal.org br...@olenepal.org:
We will have roughly 8+ AP's. We have found
...@lists.laptop.org] *On Behalf Of *Reuben K. Caron
*Sent:* Tuesday, 10 March 2009 11:29 PM
*To:* Daniel Drake
*Cc:* server-devel
*Subject:* Re: [Server-devel] Serving 400+ students w/ a single central XS
- ejabberd nightmare?
Daniel Drake wrote:
2009/3/9 Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org br
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/3/10 Reuben K. Caron reu...@laptop.org:
Have you tried loading a different firmware on these, dd-wrt?
No, but there are regulatory issues there and we won't be using them
in the schools...only used them because it was
If you aren't going to place school servers in the actual schools,
and insist on
centralizing them, the hardware recommended by Sameer is a good idea.
My argument has always been that you want local web caching and content,
and that an XS shouldn't be that much more expensive than the above
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 09:58 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
I am worried about the XO's and not the XS.
Now you're starting to see what I've seen :-/ I also worry about your
APs and networking infra -- to support 400
2009/3/9 Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org:
We will have roughly 8+ AP's. We have found that off-the-shelf AP's can
handle around 60-70 users. But that doesn't still doesn't solve the
problem of the XO's getting bogged down by tons of ejabberd chatter.
DSD: do you have any ideas about this?
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 22:36 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
2009/3/9 Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org:
We will have roughly 8+ AP's. We have found that off-the-shelf AP's can
handle around 60-70 users. But that doesn't still doesn't solve the
problem of the XO's getting bogged down by tons of
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 09:58 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
I am worried about the XO's and not the XS.
Now you're starting to see what I've seen :-/ I
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
But 200-300 users could be online at once. I think it will be too
complicated to tell some of them: Don't connect to the AP right now,
you may overwhelm ejabberd
Give ejabberd enough RAM and it won't be a problem. The rest
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 22:36 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
But 200-300 users could be online at once. I think it will be too
complicated to tell some of them: Don't connect to the AP right now,
you may overwhelm ejabberd
Bryan I assume, this is in reference with the deployment planned at the
new schools, and guess am more then familiar with admin workload and
power limitations you
happen to mention in Nepal.
Hence was wondering if you've looked into the option of using more then one
XS, installed at the same
13 matches
Mail list logo
