Try -Xmx256m. Lower case m.
--- Gaurav Handa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> I found memory error corresponding to James.Mailet
> in apps/james/logs/*
> Apart from this memory error, there is no other
> Memory related error in
> logs/phoenix.log and temp/phoenix.console
>
> The me
Hi Stefano,
I found memory error corresponding to James.Mailet in apps/james/logs/*
Apart from this memory error, there is no other Memory related error in
logs/phoenix.log and temp/phoenix.console
The memory error i found corresponds to 27th Oct. There is no error
in latest log files.
[EMAIL PR
I feel like a troublemaker. Like I say, logs/phoenix.log does not get
touched when I try to pass options, because it doesn't get far enough.
And I'm not doing anything extraordinary, I assure you. There's no
code-snippet to send!
Here's what I do:
1) change directory to the PHOENIX_HOME direct
The phoenix log file from its default location 'logs/phoenix.log'.
Its still not clear why you are trying to invoke Phoenix
programmatically.
Maybe you could paste your code snippet.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Walker, Aaron L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21,
Thanks for the wiki info. I read over it. It doesn't completely explain
what the default [onMailetException="error"] does. But I can assume that
the philosophy of "error" is to just re-queue the message and start over.
Is that correct? At least that is what it appears to be doing for me now.
If
Which log? I don't see any logs getting updated when I get this error - it
isn't getting far enough.
I'm not passing in other options (knowingly). I'm not running in an
appserver. You might as well say that I'm running from the command line.
For clarity's sake, I just tried running it from the
JWM wrote:
What do I need to do either in the mailet code or in the configuration file
to ensure any failure (with the db or anything else) on this mailet forces a
complete termination of this mail message and guaranteed no restart?
Have you any stacktrace of the problem?
Depending on the prob
Sergio wrote:
Hi guys! I'm new here.
I have some questions about how to configure James like production mail server
in our business
network. I'm trying to replace sendmail with James because we how some issues
with sendmail and it
should be reinstalled anyway. So as I like James because of easy
Jason Proctor wrote:
i'm protecting a session (blowfish) key with PKCS (RSA). the key
generation and encryption happen without incident, but at the other end,
the blowfish key does not successfully decrypt. in parallel runs of a
working client and the mailet, i confirmed that the RSA public key
Sorry everybody, it was a mistake.
Btw, this is a mail I sent to a collegue trying to understand why every time
I send something to the mailing list the mail in attach comes back: it is a
typical "user unknown" mail from a mail delivery subsystem.
Cheers
Marcello
> -Messaggio originale-
Ciao Tony.
La mail in allegato mi arriva ogni volta che spedisco una mail alla mailing
list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
La mail che cerco di spedire, comunque, va a buon fine.
Ho visto che l'errore e' che non trova l'utente [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mi
sono fatto un giro su internet e ho visto che "opas" e' un wor
James is shutting down via its disposing methods. I'm pretty sure you
should have an exception logged somewhere as the cause (OutOfMemoryError?).
Please look this logfiles:
logs/phoenix.log
temp/phoenix.console
apps/james/logs/*.log
Stefano
Gaurav Handa wrote:
Hi Danny,
I was waiting for the
Marcello Marangio wrote:
Hi all.
I am still dealing with he locking mechanism between different instances of
james.
Just a curiosity: why use the Lock class instead of synchronizing methods?
Am I missing something?
Because James still have the ability to loop through the mails and
safely fail
Hi all.
I am still dealing with he locking mechanism between different instances of
james.
Just a curiosity: why use the Lock class instead of synchronizing methods?
Am I missing something?
Cheers
Marcello
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
Carlos Aviles wrote:
Hi Alan,
thanks for answering.
Yeah, I think it would be the better and most simple way to do it.
Anyway with the RemoteDelivery mailet that comes with james 2.2.0 I'm unable
to set any authentication parameters. Does it mean that I must extend the
existent RemoteDelivery f
Hi Alan,
thanks for answering.
Yeah, I think it would be the better and most simple way to do it.
Anyway with the RemoteDelivery mailet that comes with james 2.2.0 I'm unable
to set any authentication parameters. Does it mean that I must extend the
existent RemoteDelivery functionality or someone
16 matches
Mail list logo
