Re: Book on how to run your own mail server

2024-05-25 Thread tempbox17
Hi Karsten -- Thanks for your response, I wasn't aware of these S3-compatible possibilities! The "no downtime" option is always nice to have even for smaller deployments. Rich From: "Karsten Otto" To: server-user@james.apache.org Date: 05/25/2024 10:19 AM Subject:Re:

Re: Book on how to run your own mail server

2024-05-24 Thread tempbox17
Hi Benoit -- What's inefficient about the JPA version compared to the others? And I hope the Spring version isn't deprecated anytime soon since I've been successfully using the Spring versions for years. They're about as simple and secure as it gets for running your own free mail server

Re: Migrating database -- James 3.3.0 to 3.8.1

2024-04-23 Thread tempbox17
I successfully upgraded using a copied version of the Derby database. Went to James 3.7.5 instead of 3.8.1 due to SpamAssassin conflicts but otherwise everything worked. From: tempbo...@hotmail.com To: "James Users List" Date: 04/19/2024 08:52 AM Subject:Re: Migrating

Re: Migrating database -- James 3.3.0 to 3.8.1

2024-04-18 Thread tempbox17
Hi David -- Thanks for your input. I checked the drivers in both James releases and they're identical: Derby 10.14.2.0. So I don't anticipate any versioning issues. And this page on the Apache Derby site suggests you're right even if the driver was upgraded:

Migrating database -- James 3.3.0 to 3.8.1

2024-04-17 Thread tempbox17
Hello -- I'd like to upgrade a James instance (Spring wiring) from 3.3.0 to 3.8.1. The 3.3.0 instance uses the standard embedded Derby database. To migrate the data, can I simply copy the existing Derby database to the new 3.8.1 directory? If not, what is the procedure for upgrading? Thank

Maildir to JPA upgrade options? Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache James 3.7.0 released

2022-03-18 Thread tempbox17
Thanks for this release! I have an instance of James 3.3.0 using maildir for the mailboxes. I was hoping to upgrade to 3.7.0 and convert to JPA (Derby) using the instructions here: https://james.apache.org/server/3/upgrade-database.html. Is this still a viable option? The mailboxcopier is

Re: Minimal possible build for Spring-based version of James server

2021-04-09 Thread tempbox17
Thanks Benoit -- I appreciate the response and your links. Using Spring packaging is fairly convenient for my use cases right now. Having to use Docker, Cassandra, etc. seems to be too resource-intensive for my needs and would (I think) create a larger binary and use more RAM and disk space.