On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 01:43:15 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>>> * Q1: Is it necessary to call the Agent_OnUnload()?
>>
>> [JVMTI spec of
>> Agent_OnUnload()](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/15/docs/specs/jvmti.html#onunload)
>> says this function will be called when the agent library will be
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:27:05 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> `search codecache` command does not work as following:
>
> hsdb> search codecache 0x7fedbd0aec90
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to deduce type of CodeBlob from address
> 0x7fedbc85e810 (expected type nmethod, RuntimeStub,
> The error code during class redefinition might be not enough to easily
> diagnose the problem. Some more logging might be useful to understand it. I
> encountered this problem when redefined methods with lambda usage.
> I run all existing tests with enabled logging and sanity verified error
>
On 16/12/2020 5:36 pm, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi David,
I'm not sure you mean exactly by DLL unloading mechanism is not hooked.
I want to say we do not hook `FreeLibrary()` on Windows and `dlclose()`
on Linux.
Can we describe ""this function may be called - " at here?
I think it is
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:27:05 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> `search codecache` command does not work as following:
>
> hsdb> search codecache 0x7fedbd0aec90
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to deduce type of CodeBlob from address
> 0x7fedbc85e810 (expected type nmethod, RuntimeStub,
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:54:13 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
>> The error code during class redefinition might be not enough to easily
>> diagnose the problem. Some more logging might be useful to understand it. I
>> encountered this problem when redefined methods with lambda usage.
>> I run all
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:54:13 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
>> The error code during class redefinition might be not enough to easily
>> diagnose the problem. Some more logging might be useful to understand it. I
>> encountered this problem when redefined methods with lambda usage.
>> I run all
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 18:46:14 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> I've made them log_trace to be consistent with already existing logging
>> introduced for nestmates related errors. Do you want to make all of them
>> log_info in such case?
>
> I see. I think so, yes. Since you're returning an
> The error code during class redefinition might be not enough to easily
> diagnose the problem. Some more logging might be useful to understand it. I
> encountered this problem when redefined methods with lambda usage.
> I run all existing tests with enabled logging and sanity verified error
>
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 22:47:43 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> could you please review this patch which reformats/cleans up the code of
> vmTestbase/nsk/jdb tests?
>
> the part of this patch is a spinoff from #350.
>
> testing:
> * [x] `vmTestbase/nsk/jdb` tests on `linux-x64-debug`
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 04:59:17 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> This change have been already reviewed by Mandy, Sundar, Alan and David.
>> Please, see the jdk 15 review thread:
>>
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2020-June/031998.html
>>
>> Now, the PR approval is
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:10:29 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiRedefineClasses.cpp line 935:
>>
>>> 933:the_class->super()->name() !=
>>> 934:scratch_class->super()->name())) {
>>> 935: log_trace(redefine, class, normalize)
>>
>> I think these would
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 17:25:33 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review the following small fix for test
> RemovingUnixDomainSocketTest.java. As explained in the bug comments, the
> issue is due to having two different StreamPumper objects consuming from the
> same stderr,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:52:36 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
>> Patricio Chilano Mateo has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> include 'VM Warning' in stderr search
>
> Marked as reviewed by amenkov (Reviewer).
Thanks @alexmenkov,
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 13:25:42 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> The error code during class redefinition might be not enough to easily
>> diagnose the problem. Some more logging might be useful to understand it. I
>> encountered this problem when redefined methods with lambda usage.
>> I run all
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:27:28 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> The error code during class redefinition might be not enough to easily
>> diagnose the problem. Some more logging might be useful to understand it. I
>> encountered this problem when redefined methods with lambda usage.
>> I run all
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:44:18 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
> The error code during class redefinition might be not enough to easily
> diagnose the problem. Some more logging might be useful to understand it. I
> encountered this problem when redefined methods with lambda usage.
> I run all
17 matches
Mail list logo
