Am 2012-10-22 08:43, schrieb MORITA Kazutaka:
Yes, we need more numbers with various conditions to change the
design. (I like this patch implementation, which uses the same code
with ordered work queue, though.)
I think of trying it, but I wish more users would test it too.
Hi Kazutaka,
If
At Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:14:32 +0200,
Bastian Scholz wrote:
Am 2012-10-22 08:43, schrieb MORITA Kazutaka:
Yes, we need more numbers with various conditions to change the
design. (I like this patch implementation, which uses the same code
with ordered work queue, though.)
I think of
OKAY...
call me sheep-ripper...
Am 2012-10-25 10:08, schrieb MORITA Kazutaka:
So far, I've not encountered situations where my patch shows worse
performance. In most cases, queue_work is called only from one
thread, so serializing at queue_work is unlikely to be a problem.
Another contention
At Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:55:20 +0200,
Bastian Scholz wrote:
Master Branch from today...
# collie vdi create test 1G
# ./vditest test -w -B 4096 -a
First try, some sheeps die and the vdis had failed objects.
After shutting down the remaining sheeps, restart all and
wait for recovery
Sheep calls fallocate before creating objects, so we don't need to
send actual data to be written when preallocating objects.
Signed-off-by: MORITA Kazutaka morita.kazut...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
collie/vdi.c |9 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
strcpy has a risk of buffer overflow, and strncpy may not set '\0' to
the destination buffer. This patch introduces pstrcpy to copy strings
safely.
Signed-off-by: MORITA Kazutaka morita.kazut...@lab.ntt.co.jp
---
collie/cluster.c |7 ---
collie/treeview.c |6 +++---
collie/vdi.c
