On 1/27/2015 7:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 01/27/2015 04:03 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>> On 1/27/2015 12:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>
>>> - Is:
>>>
>>> MODULE_SUFFIX=
>>>
>>> sufficient to use the default value or does it need to be commented out?
>>>
>>
>> It does not need to be commented
On 01/27/2015 04:03 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 1/27/2015 12:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> - I've attached a patch that adds xz support to the default MODULE_SUFFIX.
>> - I'm wondering it wouldn't be better to not have MODULE_SUFFX=ko in various
>> sample configs so that the default value is used
On 1/27/2015 12:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> - I've attached a patch that adds xz support to the default MODULE_SUFFIX.
> - I'm wondering it wouldn't be better to not have MODULE_SUFFX=ko in various
> sample configs so that the default value is used instead:
>
> ./Shorewall/configfiles/shorewal
- I've attached a patch that adds xz support to the default MODULE_SUFFIX.
- I'm wondering it wouldn't be better to not have MODULE_SUFFX=ko in various
sample configs so that the default value is used instead:
./Shorewall/configfiles/shorewall.conf:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./Shorewall/Samples/Universal/sh
