Thanks for the response Jens. I will try this out.
On Friday, 6 July, 2018, 2:07:15 PM IST, Jens Georg
wrote:
Hi,
regarding your question on IRC:
set_crop is probably not a good idea because it will set the
transformation in the database.
Rather get the photo, use pb =
photo.get_pi
Hi,
regarding your question on IRC:
set_crop is probably not a good idea because it will set the
transformation in the database.
Rather get the photo, use pb =
photo.get_pixbuf_with_options(Scaling.for_original())
with all transformations (scaling, rotation etc.) applied.
You can then use
I have made the first level changes to migrate from process execution for
every detect faces call, to one time execution of facedetect process and then
communicate over
DBus.https://gitlab.gnome.org/nma83/shotwell/commit/4c84248b80ebf3a1f1eb05aa60625d9d8c5d0134
The DBus interface XML is
at:htt
Hi,
OK great. I will post an update here once I have the current
functionality working over D-bus and a facedetect background process.
Hope I can use the IRC channel for any other minor questions I may
have.
On IRC I am best reachable during European business hours ~(9am - 4pm
CEST).
I was a
OK great. I will post an update here once I have the current functionality
working over D-bus and a facedetect background process. Hope I can use the IRC
channel for any other minor questions I may have.
On Sunday, 24 June, 2018, 3:59:20 PM IST, Jens Georg
wrote:
> I understand the n
> I understand the need for keeping OpenCV code in a separate process.
> Even so, I think we should consider starting this process as a
> 'daemon' when starting shotwell (controlled by an option) and
> communicate with it over RPC from the shotwell process instead of
> executing it for every 'Det
Hi Jens,
I understand the need for keeping OpenCV code in a separate process. Even so, I
think we should consider starting this process as a 'daemon' when starting
shotwell (controlled by an option) and communicate with it over RPC from the
shotwell process instead of executing it for every 'De
On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 10:48 -0300, Ricardo via shotwell-list wrote:
> Hello.
> In https://valadoc.org/opencv/index.htm there is a vapi to link
> direct
> from vala to opencv without c/c++ in the middle. Some considerations:
> First, it use OpenCV 2 which cannot detect automatically the presence
> o
On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 08:08 +, Narendra Acharya via shotwell-list
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at the current face detection code in shotwell 0.29.2
> and feel that it can be enhanced.
> So I pulled the code from https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/shotwell.git
> and started making some changes.
Hi Ricardo,
There are problems with the OpenCV VAPI that I discovered while trying to
integrate OpenCV directly.OpenCV is not C compatible anymore in the recent 3.x
versions (https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/10963). So I had to create
another VAPI bridge that took in plain C structures an
Hello.
In https://valadoc.org/opencv/index.htm there is a vapi to link direct
from vala to opencv without c/c++ in the middle. Some considerations:
First, it use OpenCV 2 which cannot detect automatically the presence
of a graphic card capable to use OpenCL.
Second, in the last stable Debian the Op
11 matches
Mail list logo
