[SIESTA-L] cgvc: No target stress found

2014-08-25 Por tôpico 邵德喜
Dear everyone: I want to get a structure without strain,follow the maillist I have done twice structual optimizations with cell variable in the second one (full opt). Here I've left MD.TargetPressure defualt(0.0GPa).But after the second optimization is completed,I've found the cell kept no

[SIESTA-L] error: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault

2014-08-25 Por tôpico mudra . msu
  Original Message   Dear Siesta User, I am trying to run parallel siesta using lam-mpi on 8 nodes. I could compile in Obj directory,but on running the program for example Fe of the package,i am getting this error. outcell: Cell vector modules (Ang) : 2.485493 2.485493 2.485493 outcell: Cell

Re: [SIESTA-L] error: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault

2014-08-25 Por tôpico joyce79928cc .
Dear: I have met this kind of question before in VASP it may induced by not enough core for calculation but since your system seems small. I think maybe it is the installation problems. -- Best Regards 邱芳瑜 Chiu Fang Yu 國立成功大學 材料科學與工程學系碩一 MOBILE:0930287221(中華) GMAIL:joyce79...@gmail.com

Re: [SIESTA-L] error: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault

2014-08-25 Por tôpico Nick Papior Andersen
First try and reduce number of cores, one Fe atom with 8 cores is maybe a bit too much... 2014-08-25 12:36 GMT+02:00 mudra@gmail.com: Original Message Dear Siesta User, I am trying to run parallel siesta using lam-mpi on 8 nodes. I could compile in Obj directory,but on running the

Re: [SIESTA-L] error: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault

2014-08-25 Por tôpico mudra . msu
Thank you for the reply.I tried with less number of cores also. But the error is persistent. I am new to siesta. So have no idea if I need to give any parameters for parallel run in fdf file.Also if it is mistake of compilation, where I might be going wrong.

Re: [SIESTA-L] error: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault

2014-08-25 Por tôpico Nick Papior Andersen
Have you tried running on only 2 cores? But, yes, I have now checked your arch.make. You should rely on only one or the other integer precision, lp64 or ilp64. Change: SCALAPACK_LIBS=/opt/intel/mkl/10.0.1.014/lib/em64t/libmkl_scalapack_ilp64.a to

Re: [SIESTA-L] cgvc: No target stress found

2014-08-25 Por tôpico Максим Арсентьев
1. no 2. this was only for check (MD.TargetPressure and MD.TargetStress from the OUTPUT file in the first structual opt of STRAINED CELL) left it default what about check? the results may be close, not exactly the same. Best wishes, Maxim 2014-08-25 13:28 GMT+04:00 邵德喜 dxshao...@gmail.com:

[SIESTA-L] electrode model calculation

2014-08-25 Por tôpico joyce79928cc .
Dear: I want to do a transiesta calculation. I know I should use transiesta to calculate electrode with SolutionMethod=Diagon first. since my electrode model is a (111) direction Al, I have 3 layer(ABC sequence) and 9 atoms for a plane. should I set my electrode isolate in x-y direction or