[sig-policy] Version 2 of proposal to revise SIG guidelines

Dear SIG members A new version of the proposal to modify the APNIC SIG Guidelines relating to the election of SIG Chairs and Co-Chairs has been submitted for consideration at APNIC 42 in Colombo, Sri Lanka. https://www.apnic.net/sig-chair-elections/proposed-revision.txt If agreed, these chan

Re: [sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block (SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED)

Hi Masato and all , Two reasons to support this prop-116-v002 from my side . 1. Consistent with its original purpose, for distribution for new entrants to the industry (which proposer already informed). 2. Increase the growth of IPv6 deployment ( Proposer can consideration this as an advantage )

Re: [sig-policy] Proposal to revise SIG guidelines

Hi Masato , Thanks for your answer and clear from my side . ​ Thank you | Jahangir On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Masato Yamanishi wrote: > Dear Jahangir, > > Sorry, I just aware nobody has not yet answer for your question. > > >Can you please clear up the question how to identify the indiv

Re: [sig-policy] Proposal to revise SIG guidelines

Dear Jahangir, Sorry, I just aware nobody has not yet answer for your question. >Can you please clear up the question how to identify the individuals entitlement who are previously registered APNIC conference and eligible on site voting like APNIC 43 meeting ? In on-site case, if the secretariat

Re: [sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block (SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED)

Hi Masato , I support this prop-116-v002 *Regards / Jahangir *On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Masato Yamanishi < myama...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Jahangir, > > So, do you support prop-116-v002 as written or oppose? > > Regards, > Matt > > > 2016-10-02 16:12 GMT+09:00 Jahangir Hossain : > >

Re: [sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block (SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED)

Dear Jahangir, So, do you support prop-116-v002 as written or oppose? Regards, Matt 2016-10-02 16:12 GMT+09:00 Jahangir Hossain : > Dear all , > > I'm latecomer of the race to get IPv4 . So as a latecomer of the > community, may i have a last option or opportunity to get resources ? > > Accor

Re: [sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block (SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED)

Dear all , I'm latecomer of the race to get IPv4 . So as a latecomer of the community, may i have a last option or opportunity to get resources ? According to transfer statistics and member of this community, we are responsible for maintaining the number resources policy and update when needed f