Hi Masato , Thanks for your answer and clear from my side .
Thank you | Jahangir On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Masato Yamanishi <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Jahangir, > > Sorry, I just aware nobody has not yet answer for your question. > > >Can you please clear up the question how to identify the individuals > entitlement who are previously registered APNIC conference and eligible on > site voting like APNIC 43 meeting ? > > In on-site case, if the secretariat find a person not wearing the name tag, > just simply ask whether he or she is a registered participants of current > or previous APNIC conferences. > Since we don't need to maintain full list of eligible voters, I believe it > is enough. > > Regards, > Matt > > > 2016-09-23 23:46 GMT+09:00 Jahangir Hossain <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Adam and all , >> >> I think some rules should be added for voting eligibility to avoid fraud >> (like NRO voting eligibility). >> >> Can you please clear up the question how to identify the individuals >> entitlement who are previously registered APNIC conference and eligible on >> site voting like APNIC 43 meeting ? >> >> >> *Regards / Jahangir * >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Adam Gosling <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Randy >>> >>> Just a couple of references - inline >>> >>> >>>> On 6/09/2016, 10:35, "Randy Bush" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> hi: >>> >>> this kludge is not very well thought out. >>> >>> not that i am advocating, but an ietfish approach would be a >>> requirement >>> to have attended n previous meetings. makes more sense to me than >>> this >>> proposal. but ... >>> >>> The NRO NC election process a similar requirement. >>> <snip>Individuals who are on site and are registered for either the >>> current APNIC Conference they are attending, or have been registered for at >>> least one previous APNIC Conference since APNIC 10, are entitled to one >>> vote.</snip> >>> https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/elections/nro-el >>> ections/nro-election-process >>> >>> Voting in EC elections is restricted to Members. >>> https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/elections/ec/vo >>> ting/who-can-vote >>> >>> personally, i am not sure there is a real problem. so what if the >>> old >>> guard gets thrown out and some new unknown folk get elected. it >>> might >>> be a breath of fresh air. what actual damage could some fresh blood >>> do? >>> some radical change in apnic across the board just might benefit the >>> internet. >>> >>> [ historical note: this descends from the first taipei meeting, where >>> there were no voting restrictions. a bunch of folk showed up just >>> for >>> the ec election and voted in an outsider, shock and horror! of >>> course, all sorts of rules and restrictions to protect the old >>> guard >>> were immediately put in place. ] >>> >>> randy >>> >>> >>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >>> * >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sig-policy mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Regards / Jahangir * >> >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
