Dear Jahangir, Sorry, I just aware nobody has not yet answer for your question.
>Can you please clear up the question how to identify the individuals entitlement who are previously registered APNIC conference and eligible on site voting like APNIC 43 meeting ? In on-site case, if the secretariat find a person not wearing the name tag, just simply ask whether he or she is a registered participants of current or previous APNIC conferences. Since we don't need to maintain full list of eligible voters, I believe it is enough. Regards, Matt 2016-09-23 23:46 GMT+09:00 Jahangir Hossain <[email protected]>: > Hi Adam and all , > > I think some rules should be added for voting eligibility to avoid fraud > (like NRO voting eligibility). > > Can you please clear up the question how to identify the individuals > entitlement who are previously registered APNIC conference and eligible on > site voting like APNIC 43 meeting ? > > > *Regards / Jahangir * > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Adam Gosling <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Randy >> >> Just a couple of references - inline >> >> >>>> On 6/09/2016, 10:35, "Randy Bush" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> hi: >> >> this kludge is not very well thought out. >> >> not that i am advocating, but an ietfish approach would be a >> requirement >> to have attended n previous meetings. makes more sense to me than >> this >> proposal. but ... >> >> The NRO NC election process a similar requirement. >> <snip>Individuals who are on site and are registered for either the >> current APNIC Conference they are attending, or have been registered for at >> least one previous APNIC Conference since APNIC 10, are entitled to one >> vote.</snip> >> https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/elections/nro- >> elections/nro-election-process >> >> Voting in EC elections is restricted to Members. >> https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/elections/ec/ >> voting/who-can-vote >> >> personally, i am not sure there is a real problem. so what if the old >> guard gets thrown out and some new unknown folk get elected. it might >> be a breath of fresh air. what actual damage could some fresh blood >> do? >> some radical change in apnic across the board just might benefit the >> internet. >> >> [ historical note: this descends from the first taipei meeting, where >> there were no voting restrictions. a bunch of folk showed up just >> for >> the ec election and voted in an outsider, shock and horror! of >> course, all sorts of rules and restrictions to protect the old guard >> were immediately put in place. ] >> >> randy >> >> >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> > > > > -- > *Regards / Jahangir * > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
