Hi Aftab,
Thanks. I will be attending in person the upcoming APNIC 55 Open Policy Meeting
on March 1 at Sofitel Hotel. Maybe we can have more discussion on this toipic.
Thank you.
[cid:image001.jpg@01D94773.53B237A0]
Joseph Kenneth Arino
IP Planning & Engineering, Telstra (AS4637)
110 Paya
Hi Aftar and all,
I am interested on this topic coz we have similar cases where our customer
(using Private ASN) who advertised their own IP block to us (AS4637) via eBGP.
Thank you.
[cid:image001.jpg@01D9476E.B79A07C0]
Joseph Kenneth Arino
IP Engineering, Telstra (AS4637)
From: Aftab
Hi Joseph and Vivek,
SLURM was designed for specifically this kind of use case (and others as
well). A ROA with Private ASN has significance for the upstream of that
particular operator and no one else. If I see a ROA with 65530 as origin
but can't see that origin in the routing table then it has
Hi Aftab,
When we questioned this Member why they created the route and ROA with private
ASN, they informed us that their upstream requested them to create it. It was
related to some automation/security feature their upstream was using to fix
routing issues.
Thanks
Vivek
From: Aftab Siddiqui
Hi Vivek and Anupam b,
On the point that why the policy will not be enforced on the existing
non-hierarchical AS-SET as mentioned in the impact section.
6. Impact on resource holders
-
APNIC has to request members to update their non hierarchical as-set
as a new
Thanks to George I saw the recording of policy webinar,
Hi vivek, can you share more details about the incident where an operator
gave a reason to create a ROA with private ASN?
RFC1930 - Guidelines for creation of an AS - Section 10
Reserved AS Numbers
The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
