Aftab and All,
I'm very sorry that I didn't express myself well in the meeting and in the
report,
(please understand that Adam and I should make this report in 15mins)
but I expect the author to improve prop-115 based on the discussion and the
survey result.
Regards,
Masato Yamanishi
APNIC SIG Ch
Thanks Adam,
Of course, I meant prop-114 and 115, not 104 and 105.
Masato@iPhone
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 10:01, Masato Yamanishi wrote:
>
> Yes, I know.
> Do I need to fix it?
>
> Masato@iPhone
>
>> On Sep 15, 2015, at 09:46, Adam Gosling wrote:
>>
>> Hello Masato,
>>
>> I think you mean (o
Yes, I know.
Do I need to fix it?
Masato@iPhone
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 09:46, Adam Gosling wrote:
>
> Hello Masato,
>
> I think you mean (one opposition for prop-114 and one support for prop-115)
>
> Not 104 and 105.
>
> Adam
>
>
>
>
> On 14/09/2015 18:28, "sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic
Hello Masato,
I think you mean (one opposition for prop-114 and one support for prop-115)
Not 104 and 105.
Adam
On 14/09/2015 18:28, "sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net on behalf of Masato
Yamanishi" wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> While now I'm seeing a lot of comments on the list and it
> On Sep 14, 2015, at 01:59 , Masato Yamanishi wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> In Jakarta, Geoff Huston presented the status of our IPv4 resources, in
> particular about exhaustion and transfer,
> and some participants asked to summarize and post it to the list for further
> discussion.
>
>
I believe, "pushed back to mailing list for discussion" and "returned the
proposal to authors for further consideration" are two different things.
*From Transcript:*
So I need to decide how to proceed with this proposal
itself.
Let me push back this proposal to the mailing list
> 2. Status of IANA Recovered pool (non-103)
>- Will run out in next 7 months+
>- IANA may allocate additional space in every 6 months
>- This pool will repeatedly ‘run-out’ as IANA delegates more space and
> it is distributed by APNIC
>- May need policy to deal with temporary exhau
Skeeve,
2015-09-13 1:03 GMT+09:00 Skeeve Stevens :
> Masato-san,
>
> With the greatest respect for Tomohiro-san and Ruri-san and yourself, I am
> very disappointed with your decision to return prop-115 to the list AGAIN
> for discussion and for a survey.
>
It is up to you being disappointed wit
Dear Colleagues,
In Jakarta, Geoff Huston presented the status of our IPv4 resources, in
particular about exhaustion and transfer,
and some participants asked to summarize and post it to the list for
further discussion.
Following is Chairs' summary of the presentation and discussion.
1. Status o
Dear Colleagues,
While now I'm seeing a lot of comments on the list and it is good thing,
let me ask you to state these comments before asking consensus in OPM.
While I have announced three proposal discussed in Jakarta, only two
comments
(one opposition for prop-104 and one support for prop-105)
10 matches
Mail list logo
