by saying you are encouraging "rapid expansion"
(This is apart from my general background opposition to special cases and
tinkering. Please, let v4 changes die. Let Sunny and Chimi finish handing
out what they have, to whomever applies, and let us move on)
--
Sanjeev Gupta
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:42 PM Aftab Siddiqui
wrote:
> Hi Jahangir,
> Peering lan should never be on the global routing table whether you
> support this policy or not. Even the peering lan of existing IXP are not
> advertised to global routing table.
>
Aftab, so for my new IX, I will get a /26
eev,
>
>
>
> 1. We don't have a separate pool for IXP delegations.
>
>
>
> 2. Based on recent delegation trends, APNIC and NIRs combined delegate
> about 280 /24's each month.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Vivek
>
>
>
> *From: *Sanjeev Gupta
> *Date: *Monday,
small
issues, we are not looking at the change is language throughout the unified
documentation, for consistency.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
___
SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
we will achieve by holding IXP allocations
to a tighter standard (/26) than general new signups, which get a /23
anyway.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 7:07 AM Shaila Sharmin
wrote:
> Dear SIG members,
>
> A ne
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:28 AM Aftab Siddiqui
wrote:
> You receive a /26 for a new site as per this new policy, you already have
> a /24 assigned to your account which is out of the scope of this policy and
> can be globally advertised if you want to, you can't advertise anything you
> receive
dying? I mean, Members should be rushing to return
their IPv4 space to reduce their APNIC bills, right?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
>
>
___
SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/sig-policy@list
ity.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
___
SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/sig-policy@lists.apnic.net/
To unsubscribe send an email to sig-policy-le...@lists.apnic.net
I am in favour of this.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:34 AM Bertrand Cherrier
wrote:
> Dear SIG members,
>
> A new proposal "prop-155-v001: IPv6 PI assignment for associate members"
> has been sent to the
what we have. Then stop. Let us not micromanage this.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 12:12 PM Shaila Sharmin
wrote:
> Dear SIG members,
>
> A new proposal "prop-154-v001: Resizing of IPv4 assignment for the IXPs&qu
no, and documented it, or a few years
from now AFRINIC members will be watching our proceedings.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:21 PM Rajesh Chharia wrote:
> Dear Gaurav,
>
> I have requested APNIC EC to put a temporary halt
t have given warning to people the
rules were changing.
APNIC Secretariat, how many transfers will be affected by Prop-123?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:16 AM, Henderson Mike, Mr <
michael.hender...@nzdf.mil.nz> wrote:
> No
he receiving party should be a current APNIC
member
Overall, I am not clear on how useful or often this will be, but I see no
disadvantages. This will help improve the Whois database, and document
what is currently been done off-books. It improves the paperwork.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 985
his and the preceding table, to have a column
with "Number of allocation made"? This may help put the increasing trend
in context.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
, and its equipment,
supporting 4byte. As we are not using communities (small operator, here),
I did not remember that use case.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
providers, and provided the network
diagram in my application.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
___
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy
other network ASN that has a different routing policy to its own.
With 4-byte ASNs, is there any concern that we might run out of ASNs before
we run out of IPv6 addresses?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
from now,
it will be seen as stupid and wasteful. But 50 years from now, they are
unlikely to care how APNIC handled allocations.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
allocations should be of, or
from, a /28.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
___
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http
_due_ to 1.2.3.0/24 being allowed
to be used internally (and even leaking externally).
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
___
sig-policy mailing
, and there are some advantages
to this proposal. I would like work on this proposal to continue, and see
if we can address the concerns raised at the APNIC Meeting.
(BTW, I see that AS15169, Google, is still advertising 1.2.3.0/24. This
may be due to the APNIC-YouTube experiment).
--
Sanjeev Gupta
21 matches
Mail list logo
