Dear Tsurumaki-san,
Thank you so much for your comment.
> * Consideration needed on how to handle transfer of 103/8 block if
> prop-116 is adopted (Prefixes will be mixed after the exhaustion of
> unallocated final /8 pool)
I'll update prop-116 to avoid this confusion.
Yours Sincerely,
---
Tomo
Dear Adam,
Thank you for reviewing this proposal.
2017-09-01 17:10 GMT+09:00 Adam Gosling :
> - After exhaustion, will initial resource requests from new Members be filled
> before unmet requests from Members already on the waiting list prior to
> exhaustion? Or will this priority only apply t
Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan.
I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-120,
based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals.
Many support expressed on clarifying how IPv4 addresses should be
distributed aft
Dear Tomohiro,
APNIC Secretariat is reviewing the policy proposals under discussion and seeks
clarification to better understand the intention of prop-120-v001: Final /8
pool exhaustion plan.
APNIC remains neutral and objective about the outcome of this discussion and
only requires clarificati
Dear SIG members
The proposal "prop-120: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan" has been sent
to the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 44 which will
be held in Taichung, Taiwan on Wednesday and Thursday, 14 & 15 September
2017.
We invite you to review and
