[sigrok-devel] Siglent SDS2000X Plus series

2023-10-17 Thread deviker
Hi, I am considering buying a Siglent SDS2104X Plus Oscilloscope but the software part of the logic analyzer of it is not enough for me. I already have an old Saleae logic analyzer I am happy with but I need the oscilloscope part too synchronized and I can't pay the Picoscope I would like. I'd li

Re: [sigrok-devel] Siglent SDS2000X Plus series

2020-07-01 Thread Christian Mauderer
Hello Marcel, thanks for your offer. I will take a look at that most likely on the weekend. Best regards Christian On 01/07/2020 07:50, Marcel H wrote: > Hi Christian, > > I don't have much time, but I can help you where possible. What you > could do, is ask the device to spit out its identity

Re: [sigrok-devel] Siglent SDS2000X Plus series

2020-06-30 Thread Marcel H
Hi Christian, I don't have much time, but I can help you where possible. What you could do, is ask the device to spit out its identity with the IDN? command. The string coming back, should contain the information that you have to place in the structs. You now have filed in "{ SERIES(SDS2000XP), "S

Re: [sigrok-devel] Siglent SDS2000X Plus series

2020-06-20 Thread Christian Mauderer
x27;t checked too much on the network interface yet. Best regards Christian > > > > Oorspronkelijk bericht ---- > Van: Gerhard Sittig > Datum: 07-06-2020 22:15 (GMT+01:00) > Aan: sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Onderwerp: Re: [sigrok-devel] Siglent SDS2000X

Re: [sigrok-devel] Siglent SDS2000X Plus series

2020-06-18 Thread marchelh
: sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Onderwerp: Re: [sigrok-devel] Siglent SDS2000X Plus series On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 16:40 +0200, Christian Mauderer wrote:>> I had already a short look at the structure definitions when adding this> but some haven't been clear without some further analysi

Re: [sigrok-devel] Siglent SDS2000X Plus series

2020-06-07 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 16:40 +0200, Christian Mauderer wrote: > > I had already a short look at the structure definitions when adding this > but some haven't been clear without some further analysis. Therefore I > hoped that I would reach someone via the mailing list who has experience > with Siglen

Re: [sigrok-devel] Siglent SDS2000X Plus series

2020-06-07 Thread Christian Mauderer
Hello Gerhard, thanks for the replies. On 06/06/2020 12:36, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 18:18 +0200, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> >> I recently got my hands on a Siglent SDS2104X Plus. [ ... ] >> >> Is there some guide or some hints (like notes for porting an older >> Siglent mo

Re: [sigrok-devel] Siglent SDS2000X Plus series

2020-06-06 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 18:18 +0200, Christian Mauderer wrote: > > I recently got my hands on a Siglent SDS2104X Plus. [ ... ] > > Is there some guide or some hints (like notes for porting an older > Siglent model) that I could use as a starting point to find out what the > values mean and determine

[sigrok-devel] Siglent SDS2000X Plus series

2020-06-05 Thread Christian Mauderer
Hello, I recently got my hands on a Siglent SDS2104X Plus. Now I tried whether it would be supported by Sigrok. It doesn't work right out of the box but with some small modifications (see attached patch), I was able to get some responses from the scope and at least a partial wave form. But it stop