Re: [sigrok-devel] Several questions for supporting usbee dx

2013-12-19 Thread Joel Holdsworth
On 19/12/13 05:42, Jong-Jin Kim wrote: > Hi. I looked at your pictures. It is awesome work - well done! This is the first time PulseView has worked with a mixed signal oscilloscope. > I'm new to this mailing-list and I'd like to say thanks to every > developers of this project. I think this proj

Re: [sigrok-devel] Several questions for supporting usbee dx

2013-12-19 Thread Bert Vermeulen
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:42:29 +0900, Jong-Jin Kim wrote: > I sent several patches for usbee dx yesterday, but I'm not sure that > those meet your requirements. I have some comments on those, will reply to the patches with comments in line. Don't take them as criticism though: it's great to see so

Re: [sigrok-devel] Several questions for supporting usbee dx

2013-12-19 Thread Jong-Jin Kim
Hi, Joel, Thanks for your reply. On triggering info from driver, I think that each drivers sends SR_DF_TRIGGER packet at least. Isn't it enough? I'll drop by IRC channel if I have a chance, but unfortunately I live in different time zones. I think pv is the most important part of the project to

[sigrok-devel] Fwd: Several questions for supporting usbee dx

2013-12-19 Thread Jong-Jin Kim
Hi, Bert, Thanks for your suggestion. I agree that SR_DF_META packet is a proper way to send it. My device like usbee dx is not a real usbee dx. it is made by myself from PCB to plastic case. and probes are cheap Chinese ones like other clones. But it works well on Windows without any problem, e