Udhay Shankar N wrote: [ on 04:51 PM 08-08-03 ]
Finally - I have confirmation of what I suspected. The latest Rush
album sounds lousy (I mean the sound engineering, not the music).
Which is funny, because Rush has always been a band that has great
production values in their music.
Here's
Hi Venky :
I think there has been some confusion/miscommunication. The List
(capital L) I am referring to is this one :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/indo-euro-americo-asian_list/messages
Since it appears that you have not read the messages I have posted there
(just read the posts from 215 onwards
Meera Nanda http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2010/how- asks How
Hindu is Yoga?, whereas the question to ask, if you ask me, is How
Indian is Yoga?. The answer is Very.
Indeed, Mysore's royal family had a long-standing interest in hatha
yoga: Wodeyar IV's ancestor, Mummadi Krishnaraja Wodeyar
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Anand Manikutty
manikuttyan...@yahoo.com wrote:
I saw the discussion on Yoga on the Indo-Eurasian Research List, and
...
Yoga is an Indian innovation. As simple as that.
Anand
P.S. More here
:
On 7 February 2011 22:22, Anand Manikutty manikuttyan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Venky :
I think there has been some confusion/miscommunication. The List (capital
L) I am referring to is this one :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/indo-euro-americo-asian_list/messages
Since it appears that you have
Venky :
Thank you for your comments. It is fine if you are unable to continue
the discussion. I understand.
To summarize my position : there is just no reason to believe that a
singularity could happen. A Singularity is still very hypothetical (more
or less in the realm of science fiction).
I
The topic of Yoga and Hinduism has been a controversial one, and this
post makes some points on that issue.
As for the references, yes, the Indo-Eurasian Research List has simply
been used as a reference. (The Indo-Euro-Americo-Asian List is a sort of
spin-off from the Indo-Eurasian List, but has
And now, what is possibly the greatest rock song of all time :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6B8JayH6NQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6B8JayH6NQ
Anand
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote:
...
Here's the answer - and it's yet another way the music cartel is screwing
the fans, the musicians (and ultimately, themselves) by MAKING THE MUSIC TOO
LOUD.
People saying this drives me nuts. Perhaps I'm being over
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 02:28 AM, Charles Haynes wrote:
The maximum loudness for a given digital medium is fixed.
Nigel Tufnel: This is a top to a, you know, what we use on stage, but
it's very...very special because if you can see...The numbers all go to
eleven. Look, right across the
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:25:11AM -, Anand Manikutty wrote:
Have you gone through the points I made on my List?
I admit I looked for them, but unfortunately failed to find any.
My claim is : there is just no reason to believe (based on the evidence
presented by Yudkowsky, Vinge and
--- In silk-l...@yahoogroups.com, Eugen Leitl eugen@... wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:25:11AM -, Anand Manikutty wrote:
Have you gone through the points I made on my List?
I admit I looked for them, but unfortunately failed to find any.So you
are saying that this graph by Kurzweil
Hi Udhay :
Thank you for your email.
Let me throw in another short summary response : in my opinion, the
Singularity has already happened. It was called the Industrial
Revolution.
Over and out for now.AnandP.S. Of course, that is why I believe that
there is no Singularity for us in the future
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Anand Manikutty manikuttyan...@yahoo.comwrote:
the Industrial Revolution
The industrial revolution is dying, I give it 150 years... I don't know what
the next revolution is, but it's clear that the information age is merely
the last stage of the industrial
On 08-Feb-11 2:28 AM, Charles Haynes wrote:
Here's the answer - and it's yet another way the music cartel is screwing
the fans, the musicians (and ultimately, themselves) by MAKING THE MUSIC TOO
LOUD.
People saying this drives me nuts. Perhaps I'm being over picky but
what they're really
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Charles Haynes charles.hay...@gmail.com wrote:
People saying this drives me nuts. Perhaps I'm being over picky but
what they're really doing is over compressing the dynamic range.
The maximum loudness for a given digital medium is fixed. To make
music sound
On 08-Feb-11 9:07 AM, Biju Chacko wrote:
The first time I heard someone talking about this, I thought, More
audiophile silliness. But then I noticed that I tended to skip newer
music when in shuffle mode. I realised that I found newer music
fatiguing to listen to -- because they're often just
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Biju Chacko biju.cha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Charles Haynes charles.hay...@gmail.com
wrote:
THAT is the travesty. They're losing detail and subtlety to people who
are too lazy to adjust the volume on their listening device.
The
18 matches
Mail list logo
