On Sun, Feb 3, 2019, 9:37 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian
> WHO has defined vaccine protocols that address your concern
>
"The politics of polio" by Dr. Pushpa Bhargava an eminent microbiologist
who returned his Padma Bhushan in protest.
How easy is it for parents (ALL parents) to find the UN protocol?
If an organization had sexual harrassment protocol on paper and it was not
very easy to find it, and there was an instance of sexual harrassment in
that organization, what happens?
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019, 09:37 Suresh Ramasubramanian
WHO has defined vaccine protocols that address your concern
Also the supposed individual risk from vaccines is vanishingly rare and this is
well documented too
Plus some of the things most vaccine deniers allege have never yet been backed
with data
I think the main problem in the vaccine 'system' is that there is the
collective societal benefit and risk and there is individual benefit and
risk and the two are conjoined.
But unlike some other systems, the collective societal benefit can only be
realized by people forcibly taking on the
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 10:36 PM Srini RamaKrishnan wrote:
Similarly there are kids who get polio solely because of the vaccine,
> Vaccine-derived
> polioviruses (VDPVs). No one disputes this, but now it becomes a
> philosophical question whether even one victim is one too many. Guess which
>
Add to what Charles said - Science is observable, testable and repeatable.
Which means you can observe x, test your hypothesis of what (y) causes x and
you can + others can repeat y leading to x.
This means that for something like vaccination for which you have several
generations of
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 14:23, Srini RamaKrishnan wrote:
The goal of applied science is not the truth. Since world war 1 the goal of
> "science" has been subverted to find applications that can be monetized:
> this can be called technology or engineering but not science.
>
So you're saying the
Srini RamaKrishnan wrote on 2/2/19 9:06 AM February 2, 2019:
I don't think I'm qualified to make sense of all the medical literature,
but here's what is obvious to me.
Science is fundamentally about healthy disagreement and debate over the
truth until it is conclusively found with no room for
The goal of applied science is not the truth. Since world war 1 the goal of
"science" has been subverted to find applications that can be monetized:
this can be called technology or engineering but not science.
Those with the real scientific temper cannot accept a solution that still
has open
I don't think I'm qualified to make sense of all the medical literature,
but here's what is obvious to me.
Science is fundamentally about healthy disagreement and debate over the
truth until it is conclusively found with no room for argument.
There's a club of 500 eminent researchers in the
one study indicates that measles can "erase" a person's other
immunities, leaving them vulnerable to infections for 2-3 years
afterwardhttps://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2015/05/07/404963436/scientists-crack-a-50-year-old-mystery-about-the-measles-vaccine
Hi yosem,
Have you published this compilations anywhere ?
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 10:25, Yosem Companys wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone know whether there's a collection of all syllabi and readings
> on technology and social good (or public good or social change)? If such a
> collection doesn't
12 matches
Mail list logo
