Re: [silk] Written vs. spoken version

2014-08-21 Thread Charles Haynes
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Rajesh Mehar rajeshme...@gmail.com wrote: The little I know of the simplified Chinese character set is that it is a set of 2 dozen or so pictograms that are then combined with each other to get other pictograms for other sounds. Could anyone else elaborate

Re: [silk] Written vs. spoken version

2014-08-21 Thread Rajesh Mehar
Thanks for the corrections Charles. Anybody knows enough about Arabic to explain? And maybe Meera can clarify the meaning of her original question?

Re: [silk] Written vs. spoken version

2014-08-21 Thread Charles Haynes
You're welcome - and to fix a bad sentence above one of my favorite examples of why trying to represent Chinese phonetically is nearly impossible is the poem... which means it's also a great example of the disconnect between written and spoken Chinese languages. Famously in the past sometimes

Re: [silk] Written vs. spoken version

2014-08-21 Thread Kingsley Jegan Joseph
Tamil, like French, relies on fairly strict contextual rules for when the same symbol (example, க in Tamil, c in French or g in Italian) should be pronounced as k or g. So, there may not be a one-to-one symbol to sound mapping, but mapping within the prescribed context is always consistent. For

Re: [silk] Slacktivism

2014-08-21 Thread SS
On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 21:20 +0530, Kingsley Jegan Joseph wrote: donations to the ALS Association Why ALS? Not saying that its not a good cause but it's not the first thing that springs to mind when I think of the burdens of mankind. shiv

Re: [silk] Slacktivism

2014-08-21 Thread John Sundman
Surely humankind is capable of addressing more than one problem at a time? jrs On Aug 21, 2014, at 1:07 PM, SS wrote: On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 21:20 +0530, Kingsley Jegan Joseph wrote: donations to the ALS Association Why ALS? Not saying that its not a good cause but it's not the first

Re: [silk] Written vs. spoken version

2014-08-21 Thread Deepa Mohan
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Kingsley Jegan Joseph k...@kingsley2.com wrote: . Kannada also exhibits this same tendency to a lesser extent - I've come across a few examples, but nothing comes to mind immediately. ​Of all the Indian language scripts that I have come across (admittedly not

Re: [silk] Slacktivism

2014-08-21 Thread Ingrid
On 21-Aug-2014, at 9:30 am, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote: I don't always agree with Seth Godin's pronouncements, but this one got me thinking - both about 'slacktivism', my response to it, and the often facile denigration of this behaviour as being facile. Thoughts? Udhay

Re: [silk] Slacktivism

2014-08-21 Thread SS
On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 14:29 -0400, John Sundman wrote: Surely humankind is capable of addressing more than one problem at a time? Yes, but that is a general reply that does not answer my specific question? Why ALS? Why not, for example, Pontine Glioma? shiv

Re: [silk] Slacktivism

2014-08-21 Thread Udhay Shankar N
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:14 AM, SS cybers...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, but that is a general reply that does not answer my specific question? Why ALS? Why not, for example, Pontine Glioma? One answer to that (which is, obviously, not the only answer) is 'whim'. Udhay -- ((Udhay Shankar N))

Re: [silk] Slacktivism

2014-08-21 Thread John Sundman
I think it's a combination of things. -- ALS is a syndrome with which many people are at least passively aware -- it's Lou Gehrig's Disease, etc. So raising awareness is more a matter of reminding people (easy) than educating them about something of which they know nothing (hard); -- it has

Re: [silk] Slacktivism

2014-08-21 Thread Sriram Karra
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:14 AM, SS cybers...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 14:29 -0400, John Sundman wrote: Surely humankind is capable of addressing more than one problem at a time? Yes, but that is a general reply that does not answer my specific question? Why ALS? Why not,