On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:57:01AM +0530, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
What is going on with Yahoo mail, in re: proprietary back ends etc.
Bored to tears already.
Curious to know how this story ha been covered by the indian newspapers ?
Tata chemicals factory may destory natural wonder
http://environment.guardian.co.uk/conservation/story/0,,2124251,00.html
Tata Chemicals, part of the giant Tata industrial group in India,
plans to construct a soda-ash
--- ashok _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curious to know how this story ha been covered by
the indian newspapers ?
AFAIK, it hasn't been covered at all. With luck it'll
make the news briefs in Down to Earth next fortnight.
Pavithra
On Friday 20 Jul 2007 9:45 am, Biju Chacko wrote:
Shiv,
Do you mind not shaking a virtual fist at everyone that disagrees with
you? It's getting tiresome.
thanks,
I think you are being unfair to me. It is one thing to disagree with what I
say, but expressing that disagreement by
On 7/20/07, shiv sastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 Jul 2007 9:45 am, Biju Chacko wrote:
Shiv,
Do you mind not shaking a virtual fist at everyone that disagrees with
you? It's getting tiresome.
thanks,
I think you are being unfair to me. It is one thing to disagree with what I
I showed this video to the people in my office (mixed demographic,
some govt. staff) :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_g72GcaIdc
most people found the video fascinating not just for its content but
for the dramatic style, background music, special effects and the way
people appeared and spoke
On 7/20/07, Rishab Aiyer Ghosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perhaps we should all become calvinists.
What, you don't like Hobbesianism?
-- Charles
On Thursday 19 Jul 2007 6:40 pm, Srini Ramakrishnan wrote:
On 7/19/07, shiv sastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
A classical example is the state of Rwanda.
Thanks for taking the trouble. I presume you have been to Rwanda -
because that is the thing required for credibility isn't it?
On 7/20/07, shiv sastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for being frank. I will be frank too. It appears to me that you were
disinterested even before you said this because you do not seem to have read
what Ashok said about me and my not having travelled to Pakistan. That in
fact is what
On Friday 20 Jul 2007 4:13 pm, Charles Haynes wrote:
Ad hominem in response may be
emotionally satisfying, but it does not advance the discussion in any
useful way.
Fair enough. I accept that and I really should not say anything more than
apologise for acting like an axhole.
Unfortunately my
On 7/20/07, ashok _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I showed this video to the people in my office (mixed demographic,
some govt. staff) :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_g72GcaIdc
most people found the video fascinating not just for its content but
for the dramatic style, background music, special
--- shiv sastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tend to test the boundaries any opinion or
possible fact posted for
inconsistencies and that is what makes me so
irritating - usually to the
person whose post i am testing.
Well, maybe there is a more non-irritating way to
do it. Otherwise, the
On 7/20/07, Thaths wrote:
4. The video, and the fact that it as been uploaded to youtube gives
me great hope for government in India. We may not be into non-gaudy
production values yet. But we are definitely on the road. The glass
appears to be a quarter full.
I rather liked the animated
On Friday 20 Jul 2007 5:25 pm, Shyam Visweswaran wrote:
One observation is that Hinduism is often said to
be more a way of life than a religion. I have
never been quite clear what this means. Other
religions also provide rules and percepts to live
your life by.
Another observation is that
14 matches
Mail list logo
