Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers
On 10/28/07, Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... or doesn't. I don't normally forward /. trash along, but in my defense, I saw this link elsewhere, by which time it appears heavily /.ed. So you still read /. ? huh... Cheeni P.S. I figured that there'd surely be other comments about the news worthy parts of Suresh's message, but reading /. is well interesting. I thought not too many did that these days.
Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:23:50AM +0530, Srini Ramakrishnan wrote: P.S. I figured that there'd surely be other comments about the news worthy parts of Suresh's message, but reading /. is well interesting. I thought not too many did that these days. I do occasionally (when I ocassionally pass by the browser tab) skim it, though there are only a few worthwhile articles/week. I used to live on reddit, but it's gone all to shit in hyperexponential time. They now even killed my.reddit.com, and recommended is full of crap as ever. I can't believe we still don't have a personal news service in end-2007. I also try StumbleUpon now and then, and am similiarly unconvinced. Server-side clustering can't be that hard, yet it's some 14 years we've been knowning that, and still nothing happens. P.S. Just came across the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_rain_in_Kerala -- Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org __ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers
On 10/29/07, Srini Ramakrishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/29/07, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I used to live on reddit, but it's gone all to shit in hyperexponential time. They now even killed my.reddit.com, and recommended is full of crap as ever. I can't believe we still don't have a personal news service in end-2007. I stopped reading reddit when they decided they were too grown up for nsfw.reddit.com Ok so on a lark I clicked the link gmail made out my comment on nsfw.reddit.com - it works. I guess they decided sex sells afterall eh? Cheeni
Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:43:32AM +0530, Srini Ramakrishnan wrote: I stopped reading reddit when they decided they were too grown up for nsfw.reddit.com I wouldn't really care for a NSFW reddit (both because it's boring, and because I have no problems to view anything I want at my work, but there has been one for a while. But I cannot forgive them to treat server-side clustering as a minor feature. By doing that they set themselves up for a yet another failure. Oh, and has Leopard been good to you, too? -- Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org __ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers
Hi, Srini Ramakrishnan wrote: On 10/28/07, Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... or doesn't. I don't normally forward /. trash along, but in my defense, I saw this link elsewhere, by which time it appears heavily /.ed. So you still read /. ? huh... Still do. Also read comments as well (only +5) .. :) Cheerio, M -- Madhu M Kurup /* Nemo Me Impune Lacessit */ mmk222 at cornell dt edu
