Yes, kind of my point.
At 09:34 AM 10/22/03 -0400, you wrote:
Sugar and honey are not the same thing. Honey contains lots of things besides
sugar and water, many of which will ionize in water.
Marshall
Malcolm Stebbins wrote:
Reid, I'm going to repeat this with some emphasis, and you
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Stebbins s...@asis.com
Sugar and honey are not the same thing. Honey contains lots of things
besides
sugar and water, many of which will ionize in water.
Some of the minerals found in honey are:
calcium 5,1 mg
magnesium 2,9 mg
phosphorus 7,2 mg
Reid- Is there a URL for your group or somewhere info can be obtained
and donations can be sent? I have been following your efforts with
interest.
Thanks
Sharon
Marshall,
Thanks for keeping up with this thread, even after I've slackened off on
it. I am continuing work with this generator,
Hi Sharon,
Our URL is: http://www.purifier.com.np but this is not an
organization, per se, and I'm imagining that you'd like to make a tax
deductable donation, to a 501 (c) 3, charitable organization. One route
would be through my collaborators, Intenational Development Enterprises
(IDE). IDE,
Sugar and honey are not the same thing. Honey contains lots of things besides
sugar and water, many of which will ionize in water.
Marshall
Malcolm Stebbins wrote:
Reid, I'm going to repeat this with some emphasis, and you should check it
out with any chem teacher you can, or however else you
Marshall,
Thanks for keeping up with this thread, even after I've slackened off on
it. I am continuing work with this generator, optimistic it can be made
to work well. But I'm now doing this parallel with some other promising
possibilities, with unexpected forms of silver. So there will be a
Reid, I'm going to repeat this with some emphasis, and you should check it
out with any chem teacher you can, or however else you are able: Sugar in
an aqueous solution - i.e., distilled water - does not increase the
conductivity, so whatever increase your measuring equipment is showing it
is
Reid
There's probably no danger of vaporizing the silver.
The boiling point of silver is 2210 deg Centigrade.
I think that's higher than the firing temperature of pottery. You would
know better than I about that.
Cinder block is pretty porous, however, you're right..not much flow.
Porousity
Friends,
To let you know, several years ago I did try making water filters out of
concrete. I used a very dry mix, like that of a concrete block, and
even less water, in hopes there would be some interconnectedness of the
pores/ voids/ fissures. However I just wasn't getting the flow. I'm
At 06:08 AM 10/15/2003 +0530, you wrote:
Ode,
I'm thinkng you may be correct. But do I get a constant voltage, even
where initial conductivity is near zero? Perhaps I could start with a
tiny amount of salt or soda, enough to get about 1.0uS. But if I end up
with only about 100 ppm of silver, to
be the answer!
Best regards,
Richard Harris, 56 yr FL Pharmacist
-Original Message-
From: Ode Coyote [mailto:coyote...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 5:54 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSconstant current and concentrated CS
At 06:08 AM 10/15/2003 +0530, you wrote
If you want to use a starter for a batch to make it go quicker, I recommend
using some CS from the previous batch.
Marshall
Reid Harvey wrote:
Ode,
I'm thinkng you may be correct. But do I get a constant voltage, even
where initial conductivity is near zero? Perhaps I could start with a
Thanks Marshall,
I did use some CS from the previous batch, about 20 ml., but this didn't
increase the conductivity. Note this was at the start of the second
batch, where I had used no starter for the first batch. At the start of
the third batch there was still little increase in conductivity
If you're not concerned with particle size at high concentrations, and
apparently you're not as you seem happy with a red result, going with
constant voltage along with the run away problem will definitely be a lot
faster than using current controls.
However, it's not a long shot to wind up
Ode,
I'm thinkng you may be correct. But do I get a constant voltage, even
where initial conductivity is near zero? Perhaps I could start with a
tiny amount of salt or soda, enough to get about 1.0uS. But if I end up
with only about 100 ppm of silver, to be as economical as we would need
to be
Mike M., Everybody,
There seem to be a few unforseen glitches with production of
concentrated CS, and I'm working to resolve these one by one. Now I'm
hoping someone can cue me to what's necessary in the event of low
current/ low conductivity, since I believe this to be the problem I'm
facing,
Hi Reid, I believe honey does not ionise, just dissolves. You could try a
little experiment by measuring your initial conductivity without running
the generator - if the two functions are separate - them add a small dollop
of honey and see if you get a,change in conductivity. There's probably
Malcolm, Mike M., Everybody,
My latest theory is that there are a couple of very different things
happening in the flask. As I already mentioned it seems that the -very
tiny- drop of honey just about doubled the reaction rate. I did check
conductivity, both for the distilled water alone, and
18 matches
Mail list logo
