Re: CSRe: Marlene, and meat

2010-12-28 Thread Dorothy Fitzpatrick
This is sooo logical Malcom and makes such sound sense. I would like to add that a lot of studies are carried out about every single thing you can think of and also can be biased to reflect a point of view. I'm not saying that this one is, but often not all variables are thought of. The

RE: CSRe: Marlene, and meat

2010-12-28 Thread Louise Larabie
Lowering high glycemic foods has helped lower Cholesterol (some believe that the higher insulin levels damage the blood vessels and the cholesterol is produced to try and heal the damage done by the insulin. Louise -Original Message- From: Dorothy Fitzpatrick [mailto:d...@deetroy.org]

RE: CSRe: Marlene, and meat

2010-12-28 Thread Louise Larabie
I think that it should be pointed out there is a difference in meat. The grain fed, antibiotic treated meat is not tolerated as well as free range/wild meat. A lot of the allergies come from processes foods (often they add things that are not shown on the label) and there is no labelling of GMO

Re: CSRe: Marlene, and meat

2010-12-28 Thread Marlene Hanson
Hi Dee you make a great point. MLE - Original Message - From: Dorothy Fitzpatrickmailto:d...@deetroy.org To: silver-list@eskimo.commailto:silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:18 AM Subject: Re: CSRe: Marlene, and meat This is sooo logical Malcom and

Re: CSRe: Marlene, and meat

2010-12-28 Thread cking001
I was introduced to The China Study by a vegan friend last year. I read it and thought the premise compelling, so I switched for a year. Liked the food OK, but the so called benefits didn't manifest. Going back to Atkins For me, sugar and carbs are the obvious bad guys, and insulin control is