Re: [Simh] Interdata OS/32: hello-world in CAL32

Actually there was also an Interdata cross assembler which ran on an IBM OS/360 and produced punched 'load decks'. I believe the 'assembler' was little more than the OS/360 assembler with a bunch of macros. When I was in high school I had access to an Interdata 7/32 and Interdata 70

Re: [Simh] Intel's PL/M-86, ASM86 and iAPX-86 Utilities source code

Hello! And I remember trying out an extension to iRMX-86 which would work with MS Windows 3.11. (Or Windows 3.0) It was an interesting idea, but I never got it to go anywhere. It would be interesting to track down the whole business. - Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com "This signature

Re: [Simh] Free USER SPACE DECNET LAT MOP

On Fri 19 Feb 2016 at 16:17:14 -0500, James Corrigan wrote: > If folks would let me know the versions of Linux and UNIX that they > need tested, I will set up a development environment for those servers > and confirm that it is operational. I believe we have functionality > test suites as well

Re: [Simh] Intel's PL/M-86, ASM86 and iAPX-86 Utilities source code

The PL/M compiler for CP/M was for 8080/8085/Z80 target, i.e. PL/M-80. Intel did a lot of work to adapt PL/M for iAPX-86 processors (8086/8088/80186/80188 variants) and added support for the segmented memory architecture amongst other changes. The last DOS version I had was V3.4 from 1987.

Re: [Simh] Intel's PL/M-86, ASM86 and iAPX-86 Utilities source code

I remember using iRMX-86 which was a realtime os environment and from memory had a ucsd like menu based user interface along with PLM-86 as the main programming language. We used it for building flight simulator visual systems. Sent from my iPhone > On 22 Feb 2016, at 15:31, Armistead, Jason

Re: [Simh] Intel's PL/M-86, ASM86 and iAPX-86 Utilities source code

A deeper look at the site "http://www.cpm.z80.de/; shows other PL/M sources, such as a "VAX PL/M", ans a PL/M to C translator. On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Kevin Handy wrote: > The "Unofficial CP/M web site" has a PL/M compiler. I don't know if it's > close to

Re: [Simh] Intel's PL/M-86, ASM86 and iAPX-86 Utilities source code

The "Unofficial CP/M web site" has a PL/M compiler. I don't know if it's close to anything you're looking for. it'S listed with the following description Here is the source to the Intel PLM compiler. It is written in Fortran (66), and is supposed to be pretty clean. It compiles correctly with

Re: [Simh] RT-11 Storage Strategy

On 2016-02-22 16:00, Paul Koning wrote: On Feb 22, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote: On 2016-02-21 16:51, Paul Koning wrote: ... True in principle. But a number of OS used a different file structure for DECtape than for disks -- because of the performance issues.

[Simh] Intel's PL/M-86, ASM86 and iAPX-86 Utilities source code

Sorry for this off-topic posting, but with all the recent talk about Intel's history of x86 development, I was wondering whether there are any "Intel connected" people around here who might know what happened to the source code for Intel's PL/M-86, ASM86 and iAPX-86 Utilities (LINK86, LOC86,

Re: [Simh] RT-11 Storage Strategy

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote: > > On 2016-02-21 16:51, Paul Koning wrote: >> ... >> True in principle. But a number of OS used a different file structure for >> DECtape than for disks -- because of the performance issues. DOS does, for >> example,

Re: [Simh] EXT : Alpha under SIMH

I hope that Camiel didn't just take the es40 code with him to whatever emulator vendor he's working for, because it was GPL 2 code, and a bunch of the IDE code was mine... Brian On 02/19/2016 01:54 PM, Zane Healy wrote: On

Re: [Simh] Compatibility you can use Was: VAX/VMS

On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:13:37 - "Dave Wade" wrote: > > > > > > You can't seriously mean that you think that a 32-bit application and > > > a 64-bit application would be expected to be compatible with each > > > other? I would expect the 32-bit code to work in 32-bit

Re: [Simh] Compatibility you can use Was: VAX/VMS

> > > > You can't seriously mean that you think that a 32-bit application and > > a 64-bit application would be expected to be compatible with each other? > > I would expect the 32-bit code to work in 32-bit mode, but having it > > work if you are in 64-bit mode is a ridiculous expectation. > >

Re: [Simh] Compatibility you can use Was: VAX/VMS

On 2016-02-22 10:48, li...@openmailbox.org wrote: On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:07:10 +0100 Johnny Billquist wrote: On 2016-02-22 07:07, li...@openmailbox.org wrote: However, we see that Intel's hardware compatability is only of academic interest because virtually none of the OS or

Re: [Simh] Compatibility you can use Was: VAX/VMS

On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:07:10 +0100 Johnny Billquist wrote: > On 2016-02-22 07:07, li...@openmailbox.org wrote: > > However, we see that Intel's hardware compatability is only of academic > > interest because virtually none of the OS or apps for several > > generations of Intel

Re: [Simh] Compatibility you can use Was: VAX/VMS

On 2016-02-22 07:07, li...@openmailbox.org wrote: On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 08:50:45 -0500 Clem Cole wrote: To pick on DEC (or IBM), the later generations of their respective ISAs cannot boot the older OS – which Intel’s primary ISA can – and that is what started this discussion. I