:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anshuman
Rawat
Sent: 22 February 2006 10:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OmPrakashTripathi 70630; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Determinine if a SIP device is alive.
SIP-Pinging
Will having a few less headers really have
ECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:38 PM
To: Anshuman Rawat; 'OmPrakashTripathi 70630'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Determinine if a SIP device is alive.
SIP-Pinging
Check out the original SIP thread.
They are talking a
-implementors] Determinine if a SIP device is alive.
SIP-Pinging
Will having a few less headers really have much affect in CPU time?
Since it is a SIP message, UAS will have to do all the things necessary
to process any SIP request.
Another point, although a 200 OK response makes sense, but
Behalf Of Darshan
Bildikar
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:18 PM
To: 'OmPrakashTripathi 70630'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Determinine if a SIP device is alive.
SIP-Pinging
OM...
As you know per RFC 3261 OPTIONS is
70630
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu'
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Determinine if a SIP device is alive.
SIP-Pinging
Hi Frank,
In this draft, you are suggesting to use a new PING method for the Heart
Beat kinda
!
*
- Original Message -
From: "Frank W. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:56 am
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Determinine if a SIP device is alive.
SIP-Pinging
>
> There is a draft bein
w (Andrew)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
"'sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu'"
Subject
Re: [Sip-implementors] Determinine if a SIP device is alive. SIP-Pinging
There is a draft being discussed on the SIP list right now to implement
a PING method. See http://ww
There is a draft being discussed on the SIP list right now to implement
a PING method. See http://www.cornfed.com/ping.txt or
http://www.cornfed.com/ping.html for the most recent version. All
comments are welcome since this is a very new draft.
FM
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 11:07 -0500, Sweeney, A
Andy, my take - it really depends on what you mean by 'active'. For example,
the device could be active but due to some error, may not be functioning as
a SIP entity any more (maybe the SIP stack crashed into an invalid state ;-)
but the device is alive at the IP and phy level)
Many implementation
ip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu'"
>
> From: "Sweeney, Andrew (Andrew)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 02/21/2006 04:07PM
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Determinine if a SIP device is alive.
> SIP-Pinging
>
&g
Hi Andrew,If OPTIONS is not suiting the requirements that you have because of the time it takes for other device to respond, I guess that would be true with any SIP request. OPTIONS seems to be the only method that is accepted by eveyone for health mechanism, though there are some devices that have
Hi,
I am looking for any draft of RFC that defines how to basically
heartbeat a sip device to know if it is active. Basically in a fault tolerent
enviroment
I don't want to send a request to a non responsive device. Presumably I
would have knowlege of a backup.
I have i
12 matches
Mail list logo
