On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 17:06 -0400, Andy Spitzer wrote:
Woof!
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:58:08 -0400, Arjun Nair ana...@nortel.com wrote:
would it be possible to switch that over to mp3?
Possible? Yes.
Gonna happen? No.
MP3 patents aside (and that is a BIG aside), encoding MP3 takes
Woof!
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:33:29 -0400, Scott Lawrence scott.lawre...@nortel.com
wrote:
Have you got a pointer to the patent issues?
http://mp3licensing.com/royalty/software.html
--Woof!
___
sipx-dev mailing list sipx-dev@list.sipfoundry.org
Damian Krzeminski wrote:
Andy Spitzer wrote:
Woof!
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:58:08 -0400, Arjun Nair ana...@nortel.com wrote:
would it be possible to switch that over to mp3?
Possible? Yes.
Gonna happen? No.
MP3 patents aside (and that is a BIG aside), encoding MP3 takes 100 times
more
Arjun Nair wrote:
Damian Krzeminski wrote:
Andy Spitzer wrote:
Woof!
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:58:08 -0400, Arjun Nair ana...@nortel.com
wrote:
would it be possible to switch that over to mp3?
Possible? Yes.
Gonna happen? No.
MP3 patents aside (and that is a BIG aside), encoding
I don't see how this assists with my original query to reduce the size for
mobile devices... which is why I would -1 it.
Damian Krzeminski dkrze...@nortel.com 08/12/09 3:57 PM
Arjun Nair wrote:
Damian Krzeminski wrote:
Andy Spitzer wrote:
Woof!
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:58:08 -0400, Arjun
If the size were reduced first then delivering the entire thing first (portal
access or not) would be inconsequential and streaming would not be overly
advantageous compared to now...
Andy Spitzer w...@iwoof.org 08/12/09 5:01 PM
Woof!
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:56:10 -0400, Tony Graziano
Woof!
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:58:08 -0400, Arjun Nair ana...@nortel.com wrote:
would it be possible to switch that over to mp3?
Possible? Yes.
Gonna happen? No.
MP3 patents aside (and that is a BIG aside), encoding MP3 takes 100 times more
CPU effort than our current implementation. Scale
Andy Spitzer wrote:
Woof!
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:58:08 -0400, Arjun Nair ana...@nortel.com wrote:
would it be possible to switch that over to mp3?
Possible? Yes.
Gonna happen? No.
MP3 patents aside (and that is a BIG aside), encoding MP3 takes 100 times
more CPU effort than our
Separate process/system for encoding as a process server comes to mind, which
could be a virtual appliance somewhere... mp3 would really make a lot of things
easier and more agile in a mobile client (bb/iphone/windows mobile os).
Damian Krzeminski dkrze...@nortel.com 08/11/09 5:47 PM
Andy
Separate process/system for encoding as a process server comes to
mind,
which could be a virtual appliance somewhere... mp3 would really make
a
lot of things easier and more agile in a mobile client
(bb/iphone/windows mobile os).
My BB and Palm both play Wav files BTW :)
Damian
...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Alfred Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:49 PM
To: Tony Graziano; sipx-dev@list.sipfoundry.org; Damian Krzeminski
Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Voicemail media encoding from wav to mp3
Separate process/system for encoding as a process server comes to
mind
-Original Message-
From: sipx-dev-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-dev-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Alfred Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:49 PM
To: Tony Graziano; sipx-dev@list.sipfoundry.org; Damian Krzeminski
Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Voicemail media
12 matches
Mail list logo
