Re: skalibs ./configure args of form VAR=VALUE ignored

2015-01-02 Thread Laurent Bercot
On 02/01/2015 21:22, Patrick Mahoney wrote: In skalibs, ./configure --help says: To assign environment variables (e.g., CC, CFLAGS...), specify them as VAR=VALUE. See below for descriptions of some of the useful variables. Though specifying CC= seems to have no effect. Ah, indeed. Tha

Re: skalibs ./configure args of form VAR=VALUE ignored

2015-01-02 Thread Paul Jarc
Patrick Mahoney wrote: > To assign environment variables (e.g., CC, CFLAGS...), specify them as > VAR=VALUE. See below for descriptions of some of the useful variables. > > Though specifying CC= seems to have no effect. You didn't specify, but I'm guessing you tried "./configure CC=...", whi

skalibs ./configure args of form VAR=VALUE ignored

2015-01-02 Thread Patrick Mahoney
In skalibs, ./configure --help says: To assign environment variables (e.g., CC, CFLAGS...), specify them as VAR=VALUE. See below for descriptions of some of the useful variables. Though specifying CC= seems to have no effect. Of course, the easy workaround of exporting the desired vars b

Re: Fwd: [skalibs-2.0][PATCH] posting new clean patch (from supervision lits)

2015-01-02 Thread Paul Jarc
Laurent Bercot wrote: > I still provide specific support for slashpackage because knowing that > it will be installed according to that convention allows software to > make stronger assumptions and be more robust; but that's pretty much > the only reason. Yes... but that benefit comes from /pack

Re: Fwd: [skalibs-2.0][PATCH] posting new clean patch (from supervision lits)

2015-01-02 Thread Laurent Bercot
I think a small change that would make toki a bit happier would be this: don't insert "/usr" into the default installation paths when the prefix is something other than "/". I have changed the default prefixes to entirely omit /usr, and added some extra magic to add /usr to includedir, libdir

Re: Fwd: [skalibs-2.0][PATCH] posting new clean patch (from supervision lits)

2015-01-02 Thread Laurent Bercot
Hi Paul, (Sorry if this appears multiple times--I think my first message was blocked due to a non-subscribed envelope sender.) If you wish to have an additional envelope sender that can post, you can send it to me, as you did for the supervision list. I think a small change that would m