Re: [Sks-devel] dump-only server (gossip but not public pool availability)

On 02/04/2018 07:45 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote: > you can spin up a second instance on the same host, perhaps bound to > 127.0.0.1:21370 and 127.0.0.1:21371 > . Have your public instance also peer with the > localhost-only instance, and the

Re: [Sks-devel] dump-only server (gossip but not public pool availability)

you can spin up a second instance on the same host, perhaps bound to 127.0.0.1:21370 and 127.0.0.1:21371. Have your public instance also peer with the localhost-only instance, and the locallhost-only instance peer only with your public instance. Then you can start and stop the localhost-only

Re: [Sks-devel] dump-only server (gossip but not public pool availability)

On 02/04/2018 07:26 PM, Hendrik Visage wrote: > Good day, > >  As I can’t dump the SKS database while running, and the file snapshot > setup not quite feasible for my setup(s) yet, I was wondering about a > gossiping only server (and only gossiping to a limited set servers close > peers) that

Re: [Sks-devel] dump-only server (gossip but not public pool availability)

Hi, I am not completely sure how new keyservers are determined, one way seems to be the peering list. If you advertise the same hostname on multiple keyservers, only one node will be included (see keys1.flanga.io and keys2.flanga.io are both included in peering lists but only keys.flanga.io as

[Sks-devel] dump-only server (gossip but not public pool availability)

Good day, As I can’t dump the SKS database while running, and the file snapshot setup not quite feasible for my setup(s) yet, I was wondering about a gossiping only server (and only gossiping to a limited set servers close peers) that isn’t connected/advertised to the SKS pool. This would

[Sks-devel] dump sources (WAS: Re: Inclusion in membership file to peer)

On 01/09/2018 02:03 PM, Alain Wolf wrote: > On 09.01.2018 18:27, Moritz Wirth wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> the pgp keyserver dump is outdated for about 100k keys - i created a new >> dump which you can use: https://cdn.fstatic.io/sksdump >> > > I removed pgp.key-server.io from the list of dumps in the

[Sks-devel] Dump on key-sever.org

Dear list members, Instead of 200+ files for the dump you will find just a single file on key-server.org anymore named sks-dump.tar.bz2. All 200+ files and a sha1sum are included. A single file should be better for all of us, no multiple connections or starting a new file every few seconds

Re: [Sks-devel] dump @ key-server.org

Awesome performance Sebastian. I'm filling a 100M pipe from the gigapop northwest node. ... 2012-01-24 09:37:49 (11.0 MB/s) - `sks-dump-0032.pgp' saved [25827014/25827014] --2012-01-24 09:37:49-- http://key-server.org/dump/sks-dump-0033.pgp Reusing existing connection to key-server.org:80.

Re: [Sks-devel] dump @ key-server.org

Am Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:15:52 -0800 schrieb C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP c...@colliertech.org: Hi, The download is complete, but I'm missing the SHA1SUM.txt file. Mine's attached. Would you send me yours? Thats what i meant, there is always something missing ;-) I added the file to the dump

Re: [Sks-devel] dump @ key-server.org

$ diff -u SHA1SUM.TXT SHA1SUM-cjac.txt | wc -l 0 It's got my approval. Ship it. On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 19:48 +0100, Sebastian Urbach wrote: Am Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:15:52 -0800 schrieb C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP c...@colliertech.org: Hi, The download is complete, but I'm missing the

[Sks-devel] dump

Hi, I missed my weekly friday dump due to the db issues. Made one right now, feel free to grab away :-) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Yours sincerely Sebastian Urbach Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence,

Re: [Sks-devel] dump

How long does it take to make a dump? From: Sebastian Urbach sebast...@ccc-hanau.de To: sks-devel sks-devel@nongnu.org Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2011 2:13 PM Subject: [Sks-devel] dump Hi, I missed my weekly friday dump due to the db issues. Made one right now

Re: [Sks-devel] dump

Robert Hinson wrote: How long does it take to make a dump? Depends on how fast you can write to disk. Takes about 90-100 minutes on my ATA/100 mirror. haven't timed it in quite a while. But I can have a full dump almost downloaded in a bit over the same amount of time -- John P. Clizbe

Re: [Sks-devel] dump

On Nov 5, 2011, at 10:35 PM, John Clizbe wrote: Robert Hinson wrote: How long does it take to make a dump? Depends on how fast you can write to disk. Takes about 90-100 minutes on my ATA/100 mirror. haven't timed it in quite a while. hint: If you're purely limited by write I/O speed,

Re: [Sks-devel] dump

Am Sat, 05 Nov 2011 21:35:34 -0500 schrieb John Clizbe jpcli...@gingerbear.net: Hi, Robert Hinson wrote: How long does it take to make a dump? Depends on how fast you can write to disk. Takes about 90-100 minutes on my ATA/100 mirror. haven't timed it in quite a while. I just made

[Sks-devel] Dump on key-server.de

Hi, Normally key-server.de should dump every friday morning. This, however does not happened this morning. Thats confusing because the tests were successful on the new system. Im investigating. -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / yours sincerely Sebastian Urbach

[Sks-devel] Dump on key-server.de

Hi, Had some probs with ftp://key-server.de but everything is sorted out and back to business as usual. Of course there was always http://key-server,de available and nobody should have suffered from a dump withdrawl meanwhile ;-) 04:14 am right now, the best time to do admin stuff ... Im going

Re: [Sks-devel] Dump

On Oct 15, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: On Oct 15, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14/10/10 17:49, Jeff Johnson wrote: Anyone interested in using mongo gridfs for SKS dump file distribiution? How do you cope with

Re: [Sks-devel] Dump

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 22:25 -0500, John Clizbe wrote: Yes, Chris. It would, especially after losing Peter's site. It would also be great if we could expand the number of sites offering keydumps so Marco's site doesn't have to bear all of the traffic. Maybe the following would be the best:

Re: [Sks-devel] Dump

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:25:41PM -0500, John Clizbe wrote: Yes, Chris. It would, especially after losing Peter's site. It would also be great if we could expand the number of sites offering keydumps so Marco's site doesn't have to bear all of the traffic. Absolutely agree, and by chance I

[Sks-devel] Dump

On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, John Clizbe wrote: Do you REALLY think spammers pull addresses one-by-one? I think you are running around solving a problem that does not exist, and impariing the privacy of a whole community's members Please explain how making available publicly available information

Re: [Sks-devel] Dump

The issue is one off vs. wholesale, and the initial inquiry from the .edu poster demonstrates that it is not generally known how to get all 2.9 million without effort beyond that of a casual attacker The initial inquiry from the .edu poster demonstrates only that the original poster didn't

Re: [Sks-devel] Dump

If I were a black hat, I would set up my own SKS server instead of downloading a dump again and again. ;) Jens 2010-10-14 14:20; R P Herrold: Please explain how adding to that pool of bad actors by providing ready access to a frequently updated corpus is a win -- If I were a black-hat, I'd

[Sks-devel] Dump

On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote: The issue is one off vs. wholesale, and the initial inquiry from the .edu poster demonstrates that it is not generally known how to get all 2.9 million without effort beyond that of a casual attacker The initial inquiry from the .edu poster

[Sks-devel] Dump

On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Jens Leinenbach wrote: If I were a black hat, I would set up my own SKS server instead of downloading a dump again and again. ;) ready access to a frequently updated corpus is a win -- If I were a black-hat, I'd be building a new product already to leverage those

Re: [Sks-devel] Dump

On Oct 13, 2010, at 11:25 PM, John Clizbe wrote: R P Herrold wrote: On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: I guess it would make sense to put a list of all sites providing regular keydumps on the googlecode webiste. Yes, Chris. It would, especially after losing Peter's

[Sks-devel] Dump

Hi, Just want to say that i tested my weekly sks-dump refresh script and it worked well and resulted in an actual dump. If someone need one, its fresh now ;-) -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / yours sincerely Sebastian Urbach --

Re: [Sks-devel] Dump

Hi. I guess it would make sense to put a list of all sites providing regular keydumps on the googlecode webiste. Cheers, Chris. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org

Re: [Sks-devel] Dump

R P Herrold wrote: On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: I guess it would make sense to put a list of all sites providing regular keydumps on the googlecode webiste. Yes, Chris. It would, especially after losing Peter's site. It would also be great if we could expand the

Re: [Sks-devel] Dump recurses to dumpsize on stack?

Phil Pennock: Is it known that when you do sks dump N dir, you end up with up to 10 stack frames per N, plus the calls into the DB layer, etc? [...] I was suspecting db problems, and it's not. Looks as though something was expecting tail recursion optimisation but not getting it. I really

[Sks-devel] dump advice?

I can now dump keys without segfaults (thanks, Kim). I have some questions for people who generate dumps already. I've been shutting down sks db recon while dumping; in practice, do people find that sks dump is safe to run while the db is running? If I want to switch sks to using one of my own

[Sks-devel] Dump recurses to dumpsize on stack?

Is it known that when you do sks dump N dir, you end up with up to 10 stack frames per N, plus the calls into the DB layer, etc? There's nothing in TODO about this, so I'm guessing not. #26012 0x000803aabbc8 in ?? () #26013 0x000800f3c5d8 in ?? () #26014 0x000188c3 in ?? ()