On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...So the content loader should try to overwrite existing nodes and
> properties ?
> >
> Yes. The only problem might be that a user has changed a property and this
> gets then overwritten by an update. But I think t
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...For maven build we have created the correct project setup to prevent
> this kind of collision even if using JDK 6 to build
FWIW, I recently noticed that our continuum builds on
vmbuild.apache.org run under j
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... Hmm, the more I think about it, the more I have the feeling that initial
> content comming from a bundle should only be used for "static" stuff - it
> should not be abused to get something into the repository which
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... We could of course add a setting to force overwrite:
>
>
>/content;overwrite:=true
>
>
> Without this setting (or having it set to false), content is never
> overwritten
Good idea to set thi
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...it would be great if we could solve this somehow, perhaps by splitting
> the configuration and classes into an own project?...
In theory, if the two org.apache.sling.launcher.webapp classes move to
another maven mod
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Alexander Klimetschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> ... /apps/foo/selector/html.esp
> /apps/foo/selector.html.esp (same but with dots instead a subfolder)
> /apps/foo/foo.selector.html.esp (NEW, for unique filenames of selector
> scripts)
> /apps/foo/selec
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Rethinking the whole issue, I'm not sure if it's really worth changing the
> behaviour as this would mean that all users have to change their paths for
> scripts
You mean our two users? Just kidding, but I'm not
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rethinking the whole issue,...
For some reason your message does not have the
Reply-To: sling-dev@incubator.apache.org
header - no idea if our mailing list server is having a hangover this
morning, or why that happene
, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Rethinking the whole issue,...
>
> For some reason your message does not have the
>
> Reply-To: sling-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Felix Meschberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...You should probably also include the
> Version interface, which also extends from Node and might also pose
> problems...
Done, revision 649089.
-Bertrand
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...The generic script name would
> then be:
>
>
> {pathPrefix}/{resourceTypePath}/{resourceTypeLabel}.{selectorString}.{extension}.*
> ...
I like the idea but I'd express it slightly differently:
{scriptPathP
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... /app/foo/bar/bar.POST.esp ...
Does the upper/lowercase mix work for our Windows users (assuming we have any)?
I have this vague feeling of Windows being braindead when it comes to
mixing case in filen
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Michael Marth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ...If Windows people could verify that they're able to create a file with
> > such a name reliably via WebDAV, that'd help.
>
> Are you talking to me? :)...
Ah right - I watched your screencasts, I should have kn
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> ...{scriptPathPrefix}/{resourceTypePath}/{resourceTypeLabel}.{selectorString}.{requestMethod}.{requestExtension}.{scriptExtension}.
>
> +1
>
> My concern now is, how do we weight these parts:
>
>{scriptPathP
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 18.04.2008, 10:44 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> >... I'd use my suggested rules as the only options here:
> >
> > rule A)
> > {requestMethod}.{reque
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 18.04.2008, 13:59 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
> >...Given that we search in /A and /V, is first /A searched
> > for possible script and only if there is none, /V is searched? Or is the
> > script
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1588 to ask for
> help about this
Roy fixed that, thanks!
The warning below is not valid anymore.
-Bertrand
>
> WARNING: For the mom
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... Therefore, I propose we split the jcr/resource bundle keeping the
> ResourceResolver stuff in the jcr/resource bundle and creating a
> jcr/loader bundle which takes over the initial content loader
ACK your Y
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... I was in fact thinking of calculating a weight value for each script
> path and take the one with the greatest value. But I think, it is
> probably even better to make use of the Comparable interface (or
> Compa
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Consider two scripts
>
> /apps/sling/sample/sample.esp
> /libs/sling/sample/sample.print.a4.esp
>
> Now, we probably want to use the latter script and not the first one
> because the latter is more specifi
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Felix:
> >... Now my question is: both launchpad/app and launchpadd/webapp use the
> > same set of bundles. Is there a way of sharing this common knowledge
> > between the app and webapp modules without creating a dep
Hi,
Please join me in welcoming Janandith, who just got accepted for the
GSoC program, to make the Scala language usable in Sling!
I'll be the official mentor for this project, but of course all
community members are welcome to chime in, and we'll do our best to
make everything happen in the open
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Today you use
> POMDs (plain old maven dependencies) and the plugin inspects them if they're
> bundles. A special scope would do the same but require the developer to use
> this scope...
I agree that it's fine for
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Vidar Ramdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... I guess this means that the JCR Explorer project was declined?...
Yes, unfortunately that won't happen, and there was another project
about creating more tests (yum ;-) which won't happen either as part
of GSoC. We're
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Gert Vanthienen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I would like to generate a link on a page to show the previous version
> of the page (in my case: I want to show the ServiceMix MessageExchange just
> before it got processed)
Cool - here's an example that wo
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Craig L. Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I'll take a shot at the JCR explorer
Great!
> ... My time is very limited, but I'll
> try and get a start this weekend. Is there a JIRA with some good
> requirements yet?...
I have started a wiki page at
http
Hi Peter,
(sorry, just remembered about that message now)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... My intention has been to deliver something finished, but I can only work
> an
> hour or so a day on it, and have some other projects on the side. It's hard
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Craig L. Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...code speaks louder than
> words. So I'll continue with my concept based on dojo, if someone beats
> me to it with ext, then so be it ;-)...
Whoever does the work gets to decide, so go for it!
-Bertrand, too ignora
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...I thought Apache didn't allow GPL'd
> code in their projects. Has that changed with the GPL version 3?...
No, we're not allowed to redistribute GPL code.
-Bertrand
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:01 PM, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... personally, i think that it would be great if the jcr explorer was backed
> on the
> standard sling json serialization and the standard forms conventions for
> writing content
Agreed - and that interface is p
Hi Craig,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Craig L. Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...1) Just about to go digging, but if someone could point me to the code
> that gets the node properties and sends them via json to the browser,
> I'd appreciate it
The starting point would be the Json
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Craig L. Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I need a system that allows users to create
> pages from a palette of controls that we provide and a way to hook those
> pages and their widgets up to our real-time data. Then I'll need to
> build bridges to other
Hi,
More details should be available soon, but right now
http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ indicates that https access to
the ASF's subversion repository is disabled.
Watch that page for updates, our beloved infra team is working on
resolving the issue.
-Bertrand
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...our beloved infra team is working on
> resolving the issue
Looks like new hardware needs to be brought up to avoid any risks, I
assume that will take a few hours.
http://monitoring.apache.org/
Hi Andreas (nice to see you here BTW ;-)
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... FYI: the IncludeTest fails on my machine after a fresh check-out (stack
> trace attached below). I wasn't sure if this belongs to an existing issue
> report (e.g. SLING-207),
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 25.04.2008, 00:48 +0600 schrieb janandith jayawardena:
>
> > 1. If there is any preferred coding standard used.
>
> We have no special coding standard. As such we generally adhere to the
> d
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 1:37 PM, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... i think that it is probably the easiest if toby and i come up with a
> proposal
> as an actual patch that suits our needs and experiences from a users
> perspective and meets the performance requirements, and
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... PS: Felix likes to thank Carsten for making this possible by initially
> submitting Apache Sling for this award !...
And we thank you guys for making this happen!
-Bertrand
Hi,
I'm currently hunting a bug where the
org.apache.sling.jcr.base.util.RepositoryAccessor cannot cast an
object acquired via JNDI to Repository, although the object does
implement the Repository interface. That Repository object is
initialized in a different webapp than the one which runs Sling.
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...After re-reading this proposal and discussing it with David, also
> considering any consequences with respect to backwards compatibility,
> performance and usability, I would like to summarize, what we came u
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think that this is caused by a change in
> Sling. It might be caused by changes in the repository implementation you
> use? Perhaps some other classes are missing in the global class l
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... I think we should move the default-rtp bundle from the jcr dir to the
> samples. It's a nice little module which more servers as a sample
Agreed, but note that it is used by launchpad/app (which is itself
also k
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... For what is it used there?...
Integration tests only at the moment, which verify that the mechanism works.
But I suspect we'll use it for examples as well, once we finally create them ;-)
-Bertrand
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I think we should move the integration tests to a separate module
> as ewll
As long as they run automatically and can also be run against a
separate Sling instance, I'm fine.
We'll have to find a way for bundle
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, this is part two :) ...
Hmm..just wondering how many episodes we signed up for ;-)
> ... I think the extensions folder is great as well and it should contain
> useful
> extensions new Sling users do not need to w
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... So, wrapping up:
> a) "commons" is a place for common code/bundles which is not directly tied
> to Sling (but used by Sling)
> b) We move the stuff from the "osgi" dir to "better places"
> c) osgi/assembly -> san
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Craig L. Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... Trying to get "mvn eclipse:eclipse" to work on the sling project and
> it's not. Is anyone using eclipse to build?...
Yes, it works for me, I do "mvn eclipse:eclipse" then in Eclipse do
"import existing project
Hi,
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sling has to report in May again. Therefore I prepared our report and
> filled in some initial content in [1]
That page says "taliating issues required in the initial release", not
sure what that means.
-Be
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If :status is "alwaysok", the 200
> response is sent
According to SLING-422, this is mode 2), the "browser-friendly" mode.
Maybe using "browser" as the :status value that triggers this, instead
of "alwaysok",
Hi,
Just added a test to [1] that shows that the following script is not
selected for a POST request to a resource of type foo:bar:
apps/foo/bar/bar.POST.esp
Is that by design?
Being able to use either bar.POST.esp or POST.esp as the script name
would help avoiding many scripts named POST.esp
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... Currently the sling/servlet-resolver fails to build because the source
> is not completely committed yet. I will commit further changes later
> this morning to fix this situation
Ah sorry, just fixed that be
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 06.05.2008, 10:53 +0200 schrieb Tobias Bocanegra:
> > afair the consensus was that the simplified script names only apply
> > for GET requests.
>
> Exactly. The assumption was (and IMHO still is), t
Hi Felix,
I agree with the suggested changes, but see comments inline:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... Special treatment for resource creation happens if the path is
> terminated by a slash (as proposed by Carsten and Roy in earlier
> message
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...should we support the trailing slash case at all ? Maybe it
> would be a good thing for some users ?...
POSTing to foo/ to create something under foo is quite usual, so we
might want to keep it in addition to POSTi
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...What about making Bertrand's use case more specific? Which means, we
> support posting to "/" (like everyone does :) ) and to
> /*.{selector.extension}, so posting to /* is not allowed
Not sure what you mean, II
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I propose to change the sling.servlet.methods property handling as
> follows:
>
> * If the property is empty or missing, the property is
> assumed to be set to [ "GET", "HEAD" ]
>
> * If the property
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...The problem doesn't occur anymore in revision 654077...
Cool, thanks for reporting!
-Bertrand
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Actually it seems to resemble a part of the
> vision I had for a future Lenya: A framework which makes it easy to build
> content management applications on top of a powerful repository
Which is exactly the focus
> [+1] Yes, move the Management Console to Apache Felix
-Bertrand
(resend - sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mistake)
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Felix Meschberger (JIRA)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... I am not too much in to the full gory details of DTD syntax. But I have
> more confidence that the w3c DTD
> is correct than IE7 interpreting correctly ;-)...
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... b) should we really add the bindings as request attributes? This makes
> writing jsps easier *if* you don't want to use the taglib. Currently I would
> people suggest to use the taglib instead
Agreed, encouragin
Hi,
Seems like our confluence wikis have the snippet plugin [1] enabled.
I tried it at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Documentation
but it doesn't work as I don't know what the configured prefixes are.
Could someone with confluence admin rights have a look? According to
[1], th
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...The prefix is:
>
> sling/ -> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/
Thanks for the info.
> ...Still, INFRA-1607 is an obstacle to this...
Ok, I'll try again once that's solved.
-Bertrand
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...getting the
> script resource - in java script - is as easy as:
>
> var scriptResource = sling.script.scriptResource;...
that's good enough for me, thanks for the info!
-Bertrand
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...what do you think of adding another variable to the set of provided
> variables for scripts: the script resource?...
+1, and it's also useful in demos to say "this was generated by the
foo.bar.esp script".
-Bertrand
Hi Janandith,
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 5:43 AM, janandith jayawardena
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... Is the repository in Sling accessible like a database directly to a script
> so the user can query the repository to get the content
Yes, but not like a database - like a content repository
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Paul Noden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...the term micro
> sling is defunct
Exactly - from the user's point of view what was microsling has been
integrated in the Sling Launchpad (the modules under launchpad/ in the
source code).
-Bertrand
Hi Jjanandith,
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:41 PM, janandith jayawardena
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...So does this mean if i come across any reference to microsling i can
> consider it as part of the launchpad and isolate it from other parts of
> sling ?
Not really - microsling was a standa
Hi,
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:50 PM, paksegu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...So can we use Sling for JSF Apps as well ...
I'm completely ignorant about JSF but I'd like to find out the answer to this.
Could you give an example (as simple as possible) of what Sling needs
to provide for a JSF app
uld move it to the jcr modules?
> (This one is not that important though)...
Why not, I'd agree to move commons/testing to jcr/testing.
-Bertrand
>
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Bertrand Delacretaz
http://www.codeconsult.ch
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... Is this the intention of this issue ?...
Yes thanks, sorry I overlooked that!
-Bertrand
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...So, let's move core to top level as "engine", move the extensions from the
> current "sling" dir to "extensions" and rename "sling" to "servlets"
+1
-Bertrand
Hi,
For SLING-458, I think it might be useful to accept path names as part
of the parameter names.
Here's an example use case, "moderation of blog comments", as a justification.
A form displays a number of blog comments on a single page.
Each comment has a radio button group with 3 values: acce
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the Accept radio button could in fact be coded as:
>
> value="accepted">Accept
>
> I think this is more intuitive that to try do a dot to slash mapping
You're right, sounds good - I'll try to come up with
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Tobias Bocanegra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...of course. i don't see a reason why this should be changed?...
I didn't mean to change anything, just overlooked what already exists.
-Bertrand
Hi Jeremias,
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Jeremias Maerki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...'ve
> gone through the 15 min tutorial. Well, it took me a lot longer than
> that. Just Maven downloading all the dependencies takes that much
Yes - we hope to have a release Real Soon Now to fix th
Hi,
FYI, the Summer of Code coding period starts next Monday [1].
For Janandith's work, I suggest that we start working with patches
attached to JIRA issues, and if we later see that that's not practical
we'll find a better way.
Janandith, could you file a Contributor License Agreement [2] with
Hi,
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:58 PM, janandith jayawardena
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When printing the Contributor License Agreement should I include the
> paragraph...
Better include everything - the ASF is a US foundation, and I guess US
law can be picky about such things.
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...the workaround is to set the MAVEN_OPTS environment variable as
> discussed. In addition this seems to only happen on Windows boxes - on
> my Fedora 7 box, this does not happen
FWIW, I have the same issue o
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Dominik Süß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... I agree, the release shouldn't be blocked by this issue.
> A note in the installation-instructions may be usefull
Good idea, I just added a prominent message at the start of the build,
see https://issues.apache.org/ji
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:56 AM, Christophe Lombart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...yep, it works after moving my maven repo in a folder without space.
> Sorry for the noise...
Thanks for reporting, added to
http://incubator.apache.org/sling/site/maventipsandtricks.html (should
be updated in a fe
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Felix Meschberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I changed that yesterday, as I thought the intention was to disable the
> generation of the Declarative Services descriptor
http://felix.apache.org/site/maven-scr-plugin.html does not mention
the scr attribute a
Hi Janandith,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 9:03 PM, janandith jayawardena
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I would like to write test cases (Automated tests) for the scala module as
> I
> code
The best might be to study the scripting/javascript module, which
implements the Rhino-based javascript e
Hi,
We had a chat with Felix about a way to provide an URL that tells the
outside world whether a Sling application is ready to run, after
startup. I need this for an application that launches a Sling
application, and opens the browser on its welcome page once the
application is ready.
The "ready
Hi,
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...So probably the SlingMainServlet is itself directly triggering the
> script executions and thus handling requests to /system/sling/status
> internally
Agree with that, makes sense.
-Bertrand
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...All in all, I think, that we should probably stay with the current
> refactored JSON library and forget about this all
+1, it's not a big deal to maintain, we have solid tests to verify it,
and the ordering of
Hi,
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:44 PM, janandith jayawardena
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Why does javascript module contain "wrapper" , "helper" and "io" classes
> instead of having only a Factory and an Engine like modules for other
> scripting languages
Wrappers are used to give simpler
Hi,
I asume that's an issue for the Felix project now that the console
moved there, but as my example uses Sling, here it is...
I've been having trouble creating a factory component, I was getting
confused while testing, and I think I found why. My example uses the
RequestDataLogger service, whic
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Dominik Süß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...About docs. I would prefer to have a nice documentation before
> releasing
That would be very nice of course, but I don't agree on holding up the
release due to lack of docs and examples. We have some (minimal)
exam
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Dominik Süß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...While I do not have the time right now I would really like to define (or at
> least help to define) a basic but obligatory set of documents for the final
> 2.0.0 release
Although the version number is 2.0.0 (or whate
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Dominik Süß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So why is it defined as major release(just looking at the version number)
> without being a final release?...
Good point, I agree that 2.0.0 might sound a bit too final for the
current state of the project - the code is fair
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...The final question is, what = which parts we want to release? ...
> I would say: api, engine, jcr (api, base, classloader, contentloader,
> jackrabbit-*, ocm, resource, webdav), launchpad/*, event, i18n,
> httpauth
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am using maven 2.0.9. What's missing in my setup?
>
> Macintosh:sling torgeir$ mvn jetty:run
> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
> [INFO] Reactor build order:...
You cannot use mvn jetty:run in the top-level source code fold
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Am Montag, den 02.06.2008, 10:36 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
>>... I think we must update the NOTICE files of the launchpad/app and
>> webapp modules to mention all non-Apache depen
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...The final question is, what = which parts we want to release? ...
> ...I would say: api, engine, jcr (api, base, classloader, contentloader,
> jackrabbit-*, ocm, resource, webdav), launchpad/*, event, i18n,
> httpa
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> ...IIRC, Wicket has a way of combining multiple NOTICE files using Maven,
>> I'll have a look at that...
>>
> Afaik this is done by the maven remote re
the license was changed to LGPL, but
what was the previous license? Our dependency is on tm-extractors
V0.4, I looked at contents of the jar found at [3] but didn't find
license info.
Can we safely assume that tm-extractors V0.4 is distributed under the
license found at [2]?
Thanks and best
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Can we safely assume that tm-extractors V0.4 is distributed under the
> license found at [2]?...
Ryan just replied to me, that all versions prior to 1.0 were released
under an Apache license.
-Bertrand
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... Unnecessary whitespace, headers, horizontal rules, page breaks,
> instructions on how to edit, and related nonsense should never
> appear in the NOTICE file...
I was afraid this would come up...I'll fix this, you're r
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ..I'm also wondering if we really need to mention stuff that is only used
> during the build but not contained in the release, like junit?...
We could take into account the dependency scopes in the mknotice
script, or us
1 - 100 of 1820 matches
Mail list logo
