Re: [SLUG] dual IP addresses

2002-03-20 Thread getadog
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 08:52:35AM +1100, Alan Vink wrote: IP Alias has been deprecated in 2.4.x and replaced by a more powerful firewalling mechanism *Could someone shed some light on this? It sounds a bit strange to me that aliases has been replaced with a firewalling mechanism, but I

Re: [SLUG] ask 2 questions

2002-03-20 Thread getadog
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:15:57PM +0800, henry wrote: Dear List : 1. How do I open a file with filename ***.ps.gz ? gv file.ps.gz gv can open postscript and pdf files, the version on my system gunzips automatically. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List -

Re: [SLUG] network cards with changable mac addresses

2002-03-11 Thread getadog
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 11:08:51PM +1100, David Kempe wrote: The only practical reason I can think of is another security factor - you limit network connects to only certain MAC addresses. How is it you do this on linux? is there a MAC addresses filtering package or some kernel patch?

Re: [SLUG] I want to remove gnome but debian wants to add stuff.

2002-03-11 Thread getadog
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 01:35:12AM +1100, Mike Lake wrote: Need to get 13.9MB/24.0MB of archives. After unpacking 3003kB will be used. I have just seen the no-download in 'man apt-get' and thats great as my system has already downloaded the needed debs Apparently not all of them, it wants

Re: [SLUG] Debian source package fails at build

2002-03-01 Thread getadog
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 11:55:32AM +1100, Steve Kowalik wrote: steven@broken:~$ grep-available -s Build-Depends -F Package 'apcupsd' Build-Depends: Which means it doesn't define any Fun I'm not sure what grep-available is searching, but I don't have any Build-Depends in

Re: [SLUG] Re: Perl Net::FTP problem

2002-02-26 Thread getadog
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:51:21AM +1100, Kerry Seibold wrote: Reposted with debug detail now included. List directory hangs also. Any ideas? Net::FTP=GLOB(0x8282e70) PASV Net::FTP=GLOB(0x8282e70) 530 Not logged in. I assume this means you're still in active mode and later when you try to

Re: [SLUG] umask file permissions with samba

2002-02-26 Thread getadog
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:41:52PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote: quote who=Kerry Seibold 770 gives rwx permission to owner and group, --- to other. 660 gives rw- permission to owner and group, --- to other. Yeah, generally the file ones are set to 660, and having stuff readable to other is

Re: [SLUG] Linux and Telstra ADSL

2002-02-25 Thread getadog
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:38:32AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: We've got a DX2/66 running our firewall here, and it's got a firewall script with about 40 rules - lots of port forwarding, a transparent squid proxy, and NAT. Load average never gets a digit other than 0 in it - unless I'm

Re: [SLUG] Linux and Telstra ADSL

2002-02-25 Thread getadog
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 03:24:08PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: Sorry? Would you care to explain exactly where my understanding of load averages is flawed? I can explain why I sent the mail. Someone said a 486 might not be powerful enough for a firewall, you said your 486 does fine, it has

Re: [SLUG] Small correction to that nextx script

2002-02-24 Thread getadog
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 04:52:13PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote: Or, check out psgrep in my .bashrc: http://perkypants.org/dotfiles/ Your comments near psgrep are the reason I don't bother adding aliases, etc, to my profile. It used to annoy me when I'd jump on another box and didn't have all my

Re: [SLUG] Samba Shre help

2002-02-24 Thread getadog
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 04:50:19PM +1100, Simon Bryan wrote: Caqn some SAMBA guru please help? I need to setup a share so that only one user has read/write access from any workstation, the user is a valid Win NT Try: [careers] path = /some/real/path writeable = yes valid users = msmith --

Re: [SLUG] Small correction to that nextx script

2002-02-23 Thread getadog
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:35:59PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's a correction to that script I posted, that tells you the next available X11 display number, so you can automatically start up multiple X sessions. Theres a trick thats sometimes helpful when greping the output of ps, ps

Re: [SLUG] trashing

2002-02-20 Thread getadog
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 07:06:53PM +1100, Grant Parnell wrote: #!/bin/bash CPUs=1 COUNT=0 while [ 0 ] do cd /usr/src/linux make clean; make dep; make $CPUs LET COUNT=$COUNT+1 echo $COUNT /tmp/compile_counter done Not sure what make 1 does. Maybe make -j $CPUs

Re: [SLUG] RE:Fatal:No images have been defined.

2002-02-19 Thread getadog
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:11:42AM -0500, Adam Bogacki wrote: Any new ideas ? You've got: default=Linux but no label called Linux, try default=Debian2.2r4 or comment out the default line. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info:

Re: [SLUG] Form submit causes output from 2 submits to be emailed

2002-02-15 Thread getadog
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 07:00:29PM +1100, Gonzalo Servat wrote: The strange problem I'm having is that the first 4 people might go to this form and type in their name and email address and I get the 4 emails. However, the 5th person may put their name in and email and I'll get the form, but

Re: [SLUG] Cant find pstoppm.ps in Ghostscript package.

2002-02-10 Thread getadog
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 02:27:12PM +1100, Michael Lake wrote: Hi all, I have a Perl script (textogif) which I downloaded which coverts latex equations to gifs by using gs to render ps files. It's failing with: Error: /undefinedfilename in (pstoppm.ps) cause I don't have that file on

Re: [SLUG] An analysis of modem performance

2002-01-19 Thread getadog
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 09:06:11PM +1100, Howard Lowndes wrote: D Dynalink (I think) connected to a Celeron 733/128Mb I've got a dynalink 56K dialup. D 220msec I get the same result with factory defaults. D 450msec +230msec Seems unreasonable. I don't have an answer as to why

Re: [SLUG] An analysis of modem performance

2002-01-19 Thread getadog
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:03:59PM +1100, getadog wrote: Seems unreasonable. I don't have an answer as to why its so much bigger. (But I could make one up if you like) There's a few thing you can do to improve delays. Compressing data adds delays, and since encrypted data doesn't compress

[SLUG] Re: INIT: ID1 respawning too fast ...

2002-01-12 Thread getadog
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 12:41:56PM +1100, Adam F. Bogacki wrote: INIT:Id4 respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: no more processes left in this runlevel. When I tried the same with the 2.4.14 kernel it was simpler: Starting GNOME display manager Not sure why you got that

Re: [SLUG] INIT: Id 1 respawning too fast .....

2002-01-08 Thread getadog
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 23:11, Adam F. Bogacki wrote: Starting Gnome Display Manager: gdm. INIT: Id 1 respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes. That message from INIT might not be caused by gdm. # Format: # id:runlevels:action:process 1:2345:respawn:/sbin/getty 38400 tty1 I think this

Re: [SLUG] pppd setuid not recognized

2002-01-01 Thread getadog
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:07:32PM +0800, Mike Holland wrote: Use 'strace' to see what is happening when (if) it tried to suid. strace is one of those cases where suid won't work. Its disabled for security. The program still runs but as the user who runs it, not root. Try strace ping 127.0.0.1

Re: [SLUG] Re: Sunday Night Linux Challenge!

2001-12-27 Thread getadog
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:58:38PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote: Anyway, that's how I got myself into the pickle. Not sure as to whether the box is back up or booted yet, too much festivity going on between times. strings /lib/ld-2.2.4 | grep kernel too old FATAL: kernel too old So you stuffed

Re: [SLUG] NCURSES experts anyone?

2001-12-18 Thread getadog
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 07:16:58PM +1100, Grant Parnell wrote: fred:/usr/src/linux/scripts/lxdialog # make clean all rm -f core *.o *~ lxdialog /bin/sh: -lncurses: command not found GRiPZ Right from your first message the command not found bit bothered me. compilier/linker/library

Re: [SLUG] NCURSES experts anyone?

2001-12-18 Thread getadog
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 09:20:55PM +1100, CaT wrote: If I try and follow those instructions and rebuild lxdialog, I get this fred:/usr/src/linux/scripts/lxdialog # make clean all rm -f core *.o *~ lxdialog /bin/sh: -lncurses: command not found This is because it's no longer an

Re: [SLUG] IDE cd burner weirdness

2001-12-15 Thread getadog
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 01:06:08PM +, Rev Simon Rumble wrote: Dec 15 13:04:48 chimay kernel: hdb: ATAPI reset complete Dec 15 13:04:48 chimay kernel: hdb: status error: status=0x00 { } Dec 15 13:04:48 chimay kernel: ide-scsi: Strange, packet command initiated yet DRQ isn't asserted Try:

Re: [SLUG] No fonts in Gnome printing

2001-12-06 Thread getadog
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:01:47PM +1100, Simon Wong wrote: One problem I do have is that my Gnome printing has *no* fonts in it. The preview shows no fonts and the ps file created is text less! I had a similar problem, I think it was because psfonts wasn't installed. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux

Re: [SLUG] No fonts in Gnome printing

2001-12-06 Thread getadog
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:43:56PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote: quote who=Simon Wong # apt-get --reinstall install gsfonts gsfonts-other gsfonts-x11 xfonts-100dpi Still no fonts. Any other ideas? try reinstalling defoma, libgnomeprint-data and libgnomeprint15 Your forgot gs

Re: [SLUG] No fonts in Gnome printing

2001-12-06 Thread getadog
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 11:00:58AM +1100, Simon Wong wrote: I did try defoma from unstable but it didn't make any difference so I downgraded again. First, try running defoma-app update gs and see if you get an error message. You might need to upgrade defoma from unstable, then try running

Re: [SLUG] Several questions after an apt-get dist-upgrade

2001-12-02 Thread getadog
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 10:06:24PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: dpkg --purge --force-depends zmailer-ssl apt-get install postfix (or exim, or whatever). apt-get install zmailer-ssl- postfix (or exim, or whatever) -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More

Re: [SLUG] SSH (not shhd) and two network cards

2001-09-27 Thread getadog
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 06:53:31PM +1000, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: | I want to ssh to our EXTERNAL webserver from here | specifying this card address AA BB V

Re: [SLUG] SSH (not shhd) and two network cards

2001-09-27 Thread getadog
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 07:58:58PM +1000, getadog wrote: On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 06:53:31PM +1000, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: | I want to ssh to our EXTERNAL webserver from here | specifying this card

Re: [SLUG] x-Fnord

2001-09-16 Thread getadog
I suspect that the mail client doesn't have to be broken as the modem will see the escape sequence before any running program(the mail client) gets it. So if you are using a modem out of the box and your connection software doesn't reprogram it before it dials up, there is a good chance

Re: [SLUG] Lilo Problems

2001-07-07 Thread getadog
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 02:34:09PM +1000, Scott Ragen wrote: Just one more thought. When I type free i get a total of 30628k of memory on a 32mb chip. Could this alter the amount of memory I would put in lilo for 128mb? nothing is onboard, no video, sound (if that makes a difference) or NIC

Re: [SLUG] mkdir and $?

2001-07-06 Thread getadog
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 09:20:52PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: This is annoying - if anyone knows why this is happening, please tell me. I'm only interested in the errno, not the error (which is not set with -p, as stated in the docs). For some reason, testing if $? = 0 is always false, even

Re: [SLUG] mkdir and $?

2001-07-06 Thread getadog
quote who=Greg Hosler which distro, and which eratta applied ? You don't know what distro Jeff runs? Where have you been? On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:46:24PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: Shouldn't matter - I was doing something embarrassingly silly. Wha? No plug? grep -ci debian IN.slug 5562

Re: [SLUG] Pam and mod_auth_pam problems

2001-07-04 Thread getadog
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 08:48:29PM +1000, Jason Rennie wrote: I've been playing around with mod_auth_pam for apache, and i cant seem to get it to work. auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so debug I've never used mod_auth_pam (reads, I don't know what I'm talking about), but I think I read

Re: [SLUG] Apache: why doesn't allow from localhost work ?

2001-06-27 Thread getadog
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 06:16:07PM +1000, Mike Lake wrote: When I point it at http://localhost/~mikel I get Forbidden You don't have permission to access /~mikel on this server. AND the URL in the browser changes to: http://mycomputername.mydomain.edu.au/~mikel/ In your apache

Re: [SLUG] Apache: why doesn't allow from localhost work ?

2001-06-27 Thread getadog
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 06:56:07PM +1000, Mike Lake wrote: So if I was using 'localhost' which is refering to a URL that the request comes from then it would use ServerName:Port ie b4114:80 ? (Real names here now.) With it off (ie just now I commented it out) what would it use as hostname

Re: [SLUG] Re: Anything like pcAnywhere - some interesting twists

2001-06-14 Thread getadog
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 08:04:47PM +1000, Howard Lowndes wrote: ...Hmmm, tried that, but no difference. Windows with blowfish is still fast, and Linux with blowfish is still as slow. Just something to try if you're bored, I have no idea if it will achieve anything. Try something like tcpdump

Re: [SLUG] Executing an Executable

2001-06-07 Thread getadog
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:11:39PM +1000, Debian User Adam Bogacki,,, wrote: Hi, I copied Wordperfect 9 into /usr but when I try to execute in /usr it I get the message no such file. ls -l tells me that 23730473 bytes of a file named WORDPERF IS IN /usr but I cannot get it to run.

Re: [SLUG] kdelibs in sid currently broken, 2.4.5?

2001-06-05 Thread getadog
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 06:28:45PM +1000, Andre Pang wrote: on another note, has anybody else found that 2.4.5 is playing weird memory games with the swapfile and is generally pretty unstable? i managed to completely freeze it just by running 'Eterm -fn 9x15' (which is actually an invalid

Re: [SLUG] Mail/exim? error: unknown local-part mike.lake in domain uts.edu.au

2001-05-11 Thread getadog
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:16:35AM +1000, Mike Lake wrote: qualify_domain = uts.edu.au comment it out. OK Have now done that. Did it fix anything? So now when you send mail locally it should append your hostname to the To: and From: addresses. To test: echo test1 | mail -s test1

Re: [SLUG] Mail/exim? error: unknown local-part mike.lake in domain uts.edu.au

2001-05-10 Thread getadog
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:52:39PM +1000, Michael Lake wrote: I get the following error when I send mail internally either to others or to myself as in the headers below. The mail bounces with: unknown local-part mike.lake in domain uts.edu.au It just so happens that I had a similar

Re: [SLUG] Strange behaviour of vim within mutt

2001-05-09 Thread getadog
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 01:32:11PM +1000, Mike Lake wrote: The first reply bounced, sorry if you happen to get this twice. When using mutt I have set the editor to vim but the keymappings are wrong. The up arrow key when pressed opens the line above and inserts an 'A' though sometimes a D or

Re: [SLUG] language jihad

2001-05-03 Thread getadog
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:24:24PM +1000, Ben Leslie wrote: To list a few bad points of Zope: It's huge, it requires a lot of machine resources, and having getting Zope to play nice with Apache is non-trivial (it likes to ignore the options its own documentation says to use to turn off

Re: [SLUG] language jihad

2001-05-01 Thread getadog
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 01:28:12PM +1000, Michael Lake wrote: Ben Leslie wrote: Python (www.python.org) is a nice object oriented language which I find quite good for most of my needs. I'll outline pros and cons below. Pros: Database interfaces for postgresql (and probably

Re: [SLUG] IP and MAC addresses

2001-04-28 Thread getadog
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 07:34:10PM +1000, marty wrote: Has someone said arpwatch yet? Arpwatch maintains a database of Ethernet MAC addresses seen on the network, with their associated IP pairs. Alerts the system administrator via e-mail if any change happens, such as new station/activity,

Re: [SLUG] IP and MAC addresses

2001-04-28 Thread getadog
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 08:29:15PM +1000, marty wrote: unless i have this totally wrong, arpwatch is no good to me... I'm not 100% sure whether it will be. But its a nice tool anyway. is there a tool that captures ethernet frames? As john already said, tcpdump, but if arpwatch doesn't help,

Re: [SLUG] IP and MAC addresses

2001-04-28 Thread getadog
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:43:33PM +1000, getadog wrote: tcpdump -eni eth0 ip I hit send then had a thought. tcpdump -nei eth0 ip and not src net 192.168.0.0/24 change 192.168.0.0 with your network address Then you will only record packets with forged source ip addresses. Then if you run