On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 14:12 +1100, Sonia Hamilton wrote:
* On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:11:51PM +1100, Trent Murray wrote:
Can anyone recommend a backup solution that can be run centrally from a
linux box and can also backup windows boxes on a LAN
I have recently come across Dirvish which
Acknowledging the risk of being flamed for promoting the mag - Linux
Journal 153 Jan 07 has an article that's worth a read, on a 12-PC mixed
OS home network backup using Duplicity.
Kevin Shackleton.
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:11 +1100, Trent Murray wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone recommend a backup
Trent for this scenario backuppc is what you want.
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/info.html
is not an imaging solution though - for that you will need to pay money.
For about 1-2K acronis true image enterprise server does what you want
and more - live imaging to central server, without
A few weeks back, Acronis was giving away older copies of True Image
for free. All you had to do was register for it.
Just for reference, this was the URL
http://www.acronis.com/mag/vnu-ati7
As you will see its since expired :(
On 23/02/2007, at 10:39 PM, David Kempe wrote:
Trent for this
Hi all,
Can anyone recommend a backup solution that can be run centrally from a
linux box and can also backup windows boxes on a LAN
Apart from performing basic incremental data backups it will also need to be
able to perform disk imaging over the wire (e.g disk images of windows boxes
to be
* On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:11:51PM +1100, Trent Murray wrote:
Can anyone recommend a backup solution that can be run centrally from a
linux box and can also backup windows boxes on a LAN
Apart from performing basic incremental data backups it will also need to be
able to perform disk
Trent ,
As a suggestion ! Rsync can perform some life saving stuff.
cheers
=MK=
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:11 +1100, Trent Murray wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone recommend a backup solution that can be run centrally from a
linux box and can also backup windows boxes on a LAN
Apart from
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:11:51PM +1100, Trent Murray wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone recommend a backup solution that can be run centrally from a
linux box and can also backup windows boxes on a LAN
Apart from performing basic incremental data backups it will also need to be
able to perform
I've just been involved in a network project that's considered backups
around the 300GB mark. In the end we decided it was too expensive to setup
and run, and led us to review exactly what data we need to back up. This is
the smartest thing to do in any backup situation, given the ratio of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John Aranibar [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SLUG List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Backup System
I installed a hardware raid some time ago for backup/security. One of the
disks became corrupted
quote who=David
I installed a hardware raid some time ago for backup/security. One of the
disks became corrupted and the other dutifully mirrored the corruption.
I'm not a geek, so I questioned the manufacturer of the raid card and they
simply told me that raid copied whatever was there! Huh?
David wrote:
..snip
Does anyone have any comment about this?
Sounds spot on.
You have raid in case your hardware fails - it didn't fail and raid
should allow you to recover/carry on/?
You have backups in case you loose your data or it becomes corrupted.
These are two independent things.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 07:21:19AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are DLT drives which do 80 gig - maybe 100, although I haven't seen
[ .. ]
If I'm not mistaken, the number in DLT whatever e.g. DLT80 refers to
the capacity after
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 06:44:04AM +1100, DaZZa wrote:
The best approach to backing up is usually to say no. Surprisingly
little data on many machines is not recoverable or reproducable or that
inportant in the first place.
With a statement like that, it's pretty obvious you haven't
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, John Aranibar wrote:
I will like an advise on a backup system, I need to back up about 300GB now
and in about 11 months time, it will add up to 4/5 TerraB. This data needs
to be kept safe for about 3 years. And there after it will be the same every
year or potentially
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 07:21:19AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are DLT drives which do 80 gig - maybe 100, although I haven't seen
[ .. ]
If I'm not mistaken, the number in DLT whatever e.g. DLT80 refers to
the capacity after compression, assuming 2x compression, which is typical.
I installed a hardware raid some time ago for backup/security. One of the
disks became corrupted and the other dutifully mirrored the corruption.
I'm not a geek, so I questioned the manufacturer of the raid card and they
simply told me that raid copied whatever was there! Huh?
Does anyone have
Hello Sluggers,
I will like an advise on a backup system, I need to back up about 300GB now
and in about 11 months time, it will add up to 4/5 TerraB. This data needs
to be kept safe for about 3 years. And there after it will be the same every
year or potentially increase by about 30% or more.
John Aranibar wrote:
Hello Sluggers,
I will like an advise on a backup system,
Try the archives for a few discussions on backing up.
Basically;
a) what is the purpose
b) when will you need to read the backup
c) how fast will recover need to be.
d) is it
Don't know about 1Tb on a *single* tape, but you could look at the IBM
LTO tape drives...
The one I used to use had a 7 tape auto-changer, with 100Gb per tape -
assuming 1 tape was a cleaning tape (auto cleaning is VERY nice), and a
2:1 compression (whether you like compression or not -
20 matches
Mail list logo
