Here's something that might make it easier on everybody if you have
control of the mailserver/firewall.
Consider this rule:-
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING \
-i $LAN_IF -p tcp \
--dport 25 \
-d ! 192.168.0.0/16 \
-j REDIRECT
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:18:05 +1000, Craig Dibble uttered
Er, sorry to nitpick, but 993 is actually IMAP SSL.
POP3S is 995
I realised that after I bashed C-c C-c to send the message. :-/
Cheers,
--
Steve
I'm a doctor, not a doorstop
- EMH,
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 08:14 +1000, Peter Miller wrote:
Is it possible to have a DHCP server tell a DHCP client what the
appropriate HELO string will be for the other side of the NAT?
If not, is it possible to figure this out from everything else the
client is given by the DHCP server?
Debian
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:58:45AM +1000, Peter Miller wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 11:22 +1000, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:14:40AM +1000, Peter Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Is there any elegant way to have a laptop DHCP client have its sendmail
Craig Dibble wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Aw man, you're picking nits that are sitting on the nit
that Steve already picked.
You're almost picking meta-nits.
Heh-heh, true, I should have said nitnitpick, but at least I
pre-emptively apologised
Actually, it was only after I
Oh, drat, dang, darn, shoot. My home static IP address is banned by CBL
for invalid HELO parameters. I couldn't even email this to slug.
Is there any elegant way to have a laptop DHCP client have its sendmail
configured properly? In all the cases I have to deal with, my laptop is
a DHCP
On 8/9/06, Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I googled for this problem, but I had no luck in finding anything
specific, only very general stuff for desktop machines that
don't wander between networks.
Not the answer you're looking for but have you thought about using
some sort of
Peter == Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter drat, dang, darn, shoot. My home
Peter static IP address is banned by CBL for invalid HELO parameters.
Peter I couldn't even email this to slug.
The way I solve this is to run a MTA on my laptop that connects via
TLS to a smarthost tht I
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:14:40AM +1000, Peter Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Oh, drat, dang, darn, shoot. My home static IP address is banned by CBL
for invalid HELO parameters. I couldn't even email this to slug.
Is there any elegant way to have a laptop DHCP client have its
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 11:22 +1000, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:14:40AM +1000, Peter Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Is there any elegant way to have a laptop DHCP client have its sendmail
configured properly? In all the cases I have to deal with, my laptop is
a
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:58:45AM +1000, Peter Miller wrote:
In my case, the value of YOUR_ISP_UPSTREAM_MAILSERVER depends on which
firewall I'm behind, since all the ISPs in question gate client
connections as being from their own customers' IP addresses, not the
whole Internet. So one size
This one time, at band camp, Peter Miller wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 11:22 +1000, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:14:40AM +1000, Peter Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Is there any elegant way to have a laptop DHCP client have its sendmail
configured properly? In
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:12:37 +1000, Jamie Wilkinson uttered
2. find someone who can host a SMTP AUTH outbound on port 993 (SMTP+SSL)
which probably won't get blocked by any of your ISPs outbound.
Port 993 is POP3S, whereas SSMTP is port 465.
Cheers,
--
This one time, at band camp, Steve Kowalik wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:12:37 +1000, Jamie Wilkinson uttered
2. find someone who can host a SMTP AUTH outbound on port 993 (SMTP+SSL)
which probably won't get blocked by any of your ISPs outbound.
Port 993 is POP3S, whereas SSMTP is port 465.
Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Steve Kowalik wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:12:37 +1000, Jamie Wilkinson uttered
Port 993 is POP3S, whereas SSMTP is port 465.
That'll learn me for just making things up... but the important part is that
it's not port 25 and thus not
Craig Dibble wrote:
Er, sorry to nitpick, but 993 is actually IMAP SSL.
Aw man, you're picking nits that are sitting on the nit
that Steve already picked.
You're almost picking meta-nits.
Erik
--
+---+
Erik de Castro Lopo
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Aw man, you're picking nits that are sitting on the nit
that Steve already picked.
You're almost picking meta-nits.
Heh-heh, true, I should have said nitnitpick, but at least I
pre-emptively apologised
;-)
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List -
17 matches
Mail list logo
