On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:05:09AM +1000, Angus Lees wrote:
surely signing email is a Good Thing for distributed communication,
and thus SLUG should be setting an example and *encouraging* it.
I agree, but only if we also encourage uploading keys to a public
keyserver. There's no point
This one time, at band camp, John Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:05:09AM +1000, Angus Lees wrote:
surely signing email is a Good Thing for distributed communication,
and thus SLUG should be setting an example and *encouraging* it.
I agree, but only if we also encourage uploading
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 12:03:05PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, John Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:05:09AM +1000, Angus Lees wrote:
surely signing email is a Good Thing for distributed communication,
and thus SLUG should be setting an example and
This one time, at band camp, John Clarke wrote:
Ever since the keysigning in July last year, I've kept a reasonably up to
date SLUG keyring at this url:
Thanks, I think you've missed my point. There have been posts to this
list (and several others to which I'm subscribed) which were signed,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 01:32:35PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, John Clarke wrote:
Thanks, I think you've missed my point. There have been posts to this
I didn't miss your point, I was merely pointing out that there *is* a
Sorry, my misunderstanding. I
but my point is that SLUG should be *encouraging* MIME and
PGP. amongst other things, that means NOT recommending against their
use..
I think that slug does do that through regular key signings and a few
threads on encryption etc - however my take on the whole matter is, hey its
a public
At Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:01:16 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Anand Kumria
- you mention removing PGP/GPG signatures. Why? I see many complaints
about HTML formatted email but I've never seen any about signed email.
They barf up quite a few mail programs, make things harder to read,
quote who=Angus Lees
don't punish those who do the right thing.
(aka don't optimize for the failure case)
It's only a recommendation. It's also a pity that we encourage the
thoroughly unmodern approach of No HTML Mail, but there's a fair amount of
agreement that it's not wanted. One can
At Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:45:04 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Angus Lees
don't punish those who do the right thing.
(aka don't optimize for the failure case)
It's only a recommendation. [...] One can always choose to ignore
the recommendation.
but my point is that SLUG should be
