On 16/02/17 09:45, Lachlan Musicman wrote:
[partitions down in slurm.conf]
> What's the reasoning behind this? So that you can test the cluster still
> works with debug before jobs start getting submitted and failing?
Yeah, pretty much!
It's a continuation from when running Torque+Moab/Maui
On 16 February 2017 at 09:36, Christopher Samuel
wrote:
>
> We also have all our partitions (other than our debug one reserved for
> sysadmins) marked as "State=DOWN" in slurm.conf so that they won't start
> jobs when slurmctld is brought back up again.
>
Chris,
What's
On 16/02/17 07:09, Katsnelson, Joe wrote:
> Just curious is there a way to restart slurm to get the below working
> without impacting the current jobs that are running?
You should be able to restart slurmctld with running jobs quite safely,
if you are paranoid (like me) then just mark
Hi Joe,
On 27/01/17 09:01, Katsnelson, Joe wrote:
> sacctmgr list clusters
Sorry I missed this before!
Can you check that the machine where your slurmdbd is running can
connect to 172.16.0.1 on port 6817 please?
If it can't then that'll be the reason why you need to restart.
cheers,
Chris
Just curious is there a way to restart slurm to get the below working without
impacting the current jobs that are running?
From: "Sarlo, Jeffrey S"
Date: Monday, January 23, 2017 at 5:12 PM
To: "Katsnelson, Joe"
Subject: RE: [slurm-dev] New User
sacctmgr list clusters
Cluster ControlHost ControlPort RPC Share GrpJobs GrpNodes
GrpSubmit MaxJobs MaxNodes MaxSubmit MaxWall QOS Def QOS
-- --- - - ---
- --- -
On 24/01/17 08:34, Katsnelson, Joe wrote:
> I’m having an issue creating new users on our cluster. After
> running the below commands slurm has to be restarted in order for that
> user to be able to run sbatch. Otherwise they get an error
When I've seen that before it's been because the
ail.com>>
Reply-To: slurm-dev <slurm-dev@schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-dev@schedmd.com>>
Date: Monday, January 23, 2017 at 4:43 PM
To: slurm-dev <slurm-dev@schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-dev@schedmd.com>>
Subject: [slurm-dev] Re: New User Creation Issue
Interesting. To the best
gt;
>
>
> But when I make the changes I’m logged in as root.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Lachlan Musicman <data...@gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *slurm-dev <slurm-dev@schedmd.com>
> *Date: *Monday, January 23, 2017 at 4:43 PM
> *To: *slurm-dev <slurm-dev@sc
happens to be the slurm user
But when I make the changes I’m logged in as root.
From: Lachlan Musicman <data...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: slurm-dev <slurm-dev@schedmd.com>
Date: Monday, January 23, 2017 at 4:43 PM
To: slurm-dev <slurm-dev@schedmd.com>
Subject: [slurm-dev] Re: New U
Interesting. To the best of my knowledge, if you are using Accounting, all
users actually need to be in an association - ie having a user account is
insufficient.
An Association is a tuple consisting of: cluster, user, account and
(optional) partition.
Is that the problem?
cheers
L.
--
The
11 matches
Mail list logo