Just to note I see that in triton the cpu_cap is set as well as cpu_shares
== max_physical_memory
I am struggling to understand how this works. I am guessing that if the
ratio of cpu_cap to cores is low then its not that noticeable to the
guests, the threads get through in a reasonable amount of
I like to think about CPU as a resource either under contention (more
processes need CPU time than CPU cores to go around) or not:
CPU caps limit how much you can use when there's no contention. In the
Joyent Could it ensures people don't get more CPU time than they pay for.
(example 1 below)
On 12/2/16 8:17 , Len Weincier wrote:
> On 2 December 2016 at 18:04, Robert Mustacchi wrote:
>
>> On 12/1/16 23:44 , Len Weincier wrote:
This is the classic symptom of a machine with a cpu_cap less than its
>> CPU
(core) count.
>>>
>>> So the vm sees all the
On 2 December 2016 at 16:43, Nahum Shalman wrote:
> I like to think about CPU as a resource either under contention (more
> processes need CPU time than CPU cores to go around) or not:
>
> CPU caps limit how much you can use when there's no contention. In the
> Joyent Could
On 2 December 2016 at 18:30, Robert Mustacchi wrote:
> On 12/2/16 8:17 , Len Weincier wrote:
> > On 2 December 2016 at 18:04, Robert Mustacchi wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/1/16 23:44 , Len Weincier wrote:
>
> This is the classic symptom of a machine with a
On 2 December 2016 at 18:04, Robert Mustacchi wrote:
> On 12/1/16 23:44 , Len Weincier wrote:
> >>
> >> This is the classic symptom of a machine with a cpu_cap less than its
> CPU
> >> (core) count.
> >>
> >
> > So the vm sees all the cores and dispatches threads / processes for
Hi all,
I tried setting up a VRRP interface with help of the wiki (
https://wiki.smartos.org/display/DOC/Managing+NICs#ManagingNICs-AddingVRRPnicstoVMs
). I used the following configuration to add an interface for use with VRRP
(changed IP's and MAC's):
-8<-
{
"add_nics":
On 12/1/16 23:44 , Len Weincier wrote:
>>
>> This is the classic symptom of a machine with a cpu_cap less than its CPU
>> (core) count.
>>
>
> So the vm sees all the cores and dispatches threads / processes for that
> many cores but the actual uasage is limited by the cpu_cap so the threads
> are
On 11/28/16 22:32 , 郑圆杰 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got some problems using dladm to limit bandwith of vnic in smartos(20160921)
>
>
> 1) I enforce a bandwith limit to 1G using dladm set-linkprop –z -t
> –p maxbw=1G eth0.
>
> I can ping the ip and wget file for the ip.
>
> It work fine and the
hi,all
Purpose: I want to change dedicated-cpu as cpu-share for vm by zonecfg.
Program 1:
When the modifiy is completed,
I only type the cmd: $ zoneadm -z 2b1e7695-c7c6-4752-9990-ee83f5756664 reboot
And finally use the "poolstat" to view the result,such as:
[root@smartos-pxe ~]# poolstat
On 12/ 3/16 03:43 AM, Nahum Shalman wrote:
I like to think about CPU as a resource either under contention (more
processes need CPU time than CPU cores to go around) or not:
CPU caps limit how much you can use when there's no contention. In the
Joyent Could it ensures people don't get more
11 matches
Mail list logo