[smartos-discuss] RE: [developer] HBA recommended except LSI and ARECA

[fred]：ok. Let's see how it goes after I get the hba. [fred]: I have got 6805H HBA. It can recognize the sata drives in bios but these drives cannot be detected in the latest illumos(smartos,oi) release. I haven’t got a sas drive to test. But the price delta between sas and sata

[smartos-discuss] RE: [developer] HBA recommended except LSI and ARECA

> -Original Message- > From: Keith Wesolowski [mailto:keith.wesolow...@joyent.com] > Sent: 星期一, 五月 05, 2014 10:19 > To: Fred Liu > Cc: Fred Liu; smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org; > develo...@lists.illumos.org; Discussion list for OpenIndiana; OmniOS- > disc...@lists

[smartos-discuss] Re: [developer] HBA recommended except LSI and ARECA

Keith Wesolowski 于2014年5月5日星期一写道： > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 02:49:15AM -0700, Fred Liu wrote: > > > Just like what Bob mentioned, the current pmcs(7D) in illumos cannot > work with 6H/7H > > series of HBAs. Even replaced with SAS drives, the effort is still in > vain

[smartos-discuss] RE: [developer] HBA recommended except LSI and ARECA

>From: Zhiwen Zheng [mailto:zhiwen...@gmail.com] >Sent: 星期二, 五月 06, 2014 10:09 >To: Keith Wesolowski >Cc: omnios-disc...@lists.omniti.com; Fred Liu; Discussion list for >OpenIndiana; Fred Liu; develo...@lists.illumos.org; >smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org >Subject

[smartos-discuss] ypbind statvfs failed with [Value too large for defined data type]

Hi, I am trying to play ypbind on joyent_20160108T173524Z but I get following errors: 2016-01-15T17:47:26+09:00 pluto ypbind[4634]: [ID 472466 daemon.error] statvfs failed with [Value too large for defined data type] Is the ypbind from SmartOS compiled from source or just copy from old releas

[smartos-discuss] RE: [developer] ypbind statvfs failed with [Value too large for defined data type]

From: Igor Kozhukhov [mailto:ikozhuk...@gmail.com] Sent: 星期五, 一月 15, 2016 19:26 To: Fred Liu; smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org Cc: illumos-developer Subject: Re: [developer] ypbind statvfs failed with [Value too large for defined data type] ypbind is part of illumos: https://github.com

[smartos-discuss] RE: [developer] ypbind statvfs failed with [Value too large for defined data type]

> -Original Message- > From: Igor Kozhukhov [mailto:ikozhuk...@gmail.com] > Sent: 星期五, 一月 15, 2016 19:45 > To: Fred Liu; smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Cc: illumos-developer > Subject: Re: [developer] ypbind statvfs failed with [Value too large > for defined da

[smartos-discuss] enable some services when building smartos

Hi, Is " smartos-live/overlay/generic/usr/lib/brand/joyent/manifests" the right one to modify? I got successful building, but it looks the services enabled by me are still disabled. Thanks. Fred --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/m

[smartos-discuss] Is zfs deadm man timer tunable?

Hi, Subject says it all. Thanks. Fred --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/membe

RE: [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable?

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@richardelling.com] > Sent: 星期五, 一月 22, 2016 12:02 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] Is zfs deadm man timer tunable? > > > > On Jan 21, 2016, at 4:25 AM

RE: [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable?

Comment below. From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@richardelling.com] Sent: 星期五, 一月 22, 2016 13:51 To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable? answer far below... On Jan 21, 2016, at 8:44 PM, Fred Liu wrote: -Original

RE: [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable?

-- f085771648c0NULL OPEN -- f08577164c48NULL OPEN -- f086b921f3b0NULL CHECKSUM_VERIFY f003d1fc5c40 - > -Original Message- > From: Fred Liu [mailto:fred_...@issi.com] > Sent: 星

[smartos-discuss] rpc.idmapd not working in lx brand

Hi, I am playing following lx brand zone: 82cf0a0a-6afc-11e5-8f79-273b6aea6443 centos-620151005 linux lx-dataset2015-10-05 And it looks like rpc.idmapd not working which cause NFSv4 mount not working. Thanks. Fred --- smartos-d

RE: [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable?

From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@richardelling.com] Sent: 星期六, 一月 23, 2016 2:55 To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org Cc: illumos-developer Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable? On Jan 21, 2016, at 10:18 PM, Fred Liu wrote: Comment below. From: Richard

RE: [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable?

> -Original Message- > From: Robert Mustacchi [mailto:r...@joyent.com] > Sent: 星期二, 一月 26, 2016 14:57 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Cc: illumos-developer > Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable? > > On 1/25/16 22:50 , Fred Li

RE: [developer] RE: [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable?

> -Original Message- > From: Robert Mustacchi [mailto:r...@joyent.com] > Sent: 星期二, 一月 26, 2016 15:21 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Cc: illumos-developer > Subject: Re: [developer] RE: [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer > tunable? > > On 1/2

RE: [developer] [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable?

>savecore serves two functions: >1. copy the dump from the dump device to a filesystem: vmdump.# (done at boot >by >   the dumpadm SMF service) >2. extract the vmcore.# and unix.# from a vmdump.# >Unless you've dumped again, the old dump should still be on the dump device. root@pluto ~]# saveco

RE: [developer] [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable?

>From: Youzhong Yang [mailto:youzh...@gmail.com] >Sent: 星期三, 一月 27, 2016 11:41 >To: Fred Liu >Cc: Richard Elling; smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org; illumos-developer >Subject: Re: [developer] [smartos-discuss] Is zfs dead man timer tunable? >       -d >               

[smartos-discuss] benchmarking between LX and KVM

Hi, Anyone who has ever tried performance benchmarking between LX and KVM. In my dirty-and-quick test(compling gcc), LX is 20% slower than KVM. It is sort of disspointed! Thanks. Fred --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archiv

RE: [smartos-discuss] benchmarking between LX and KVM

> > Are you performing active benchmarking and on the latest platform? This > is a case where a quick use of the USE method may be rather insightful. > If you just did a fire and forget, it's very easy to end up comparing > different things. Yes. I am running joyent_20160121T174331Z. It is just

[smartos-discuss] How can I update or comment on SmartOS wiki?

Hi, Just want to ask if it is possible to update or comment on SmartOS wiki. Thanks. Fred --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modi

[smartos-discuss] RE: rpc.idmapd not working in lx brand

for method nsswitch rpc.idmapd: Expiration time is 600 seconds. rpc.idmapd: nfsdopenone: Opening /proc/net/rpc/nfs4.nametoid/channel failed: errno 20 (Not a directory) rpc.idmapd: main: open(/var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs//nfs): No such file or directory From: Fred Liu Sent: 星期一, 一月 25, 2016 18:43

RE: [smartos-discuss] How can I update or comment on SmartOS wiki?

> -Original Message- > From: Travis Paul [mailto:t...@vispaul.me] > Sent: 星期六, 二月 06, 2016 7:09 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] How can I update or comment on SmartOS > wiki? > > I can't say for sure as I don't have the privileges to add users. Bu

RE: [smartos-discuss] rpc.idmapd not working in lx brand

] Sent: 星期二, 二月 09, 2016 2:03 To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org Cc: Fred Liu; illumos-developer Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] rpc.idmapd not working in lx brand That image is over four months old now. Can you try with a newer image? And which platform version are you running on? -- Brian Be

RE: [smartos-discuss] rpc.idmapd not working in lx brand

Here we go: https://github.com/joyent/illumos-joyent/issues/97 Thanks. Fred From: Brian Bennett [mailto:brian.benn...@joyent.com] Sent: 星期二, 二月 16, 2016 13:37 To: Fred Liu Cc: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org; illumos-developer Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] rpc.idmapd not working in lx brand

[smartos-discuss] the partition size is fixed 1.86G in USB stick. Can it be enlarged?

--- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125

RE: [smartos-discuss] the partition size is fixed 1.86G in USB stick. Can it be enlarged?

image. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Fred Liu mailto:fred_...@issi.com>> wrote: smartos-discuss | Archives<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now> [https://www.listbox.com/images/feed-icon-10x10.jpg96494be.jpg?uri=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubGlzdGJveC5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2ZlZWQtaW

RE: [smartos-discuss] the partition size is fixed 1.86G in USB stick. Can it be enlarged?

stick. Can it be enlarged? To: mailto:smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org>> Cc: Fred Liu mailto:fred_...@issi.com>> You can also just resize the fat partition after writing to the UBS stick. Jorge On 2016-02-16 12:58, Fred Liu wrote: It should be doable if we can hack in “

[smartos-discuss] enable network/physical in noinstall/recovery?

Hi, “noinstall/recovery” is really helpful to fix/save zpools. But it is offline. Is it hard to enable networking in it? Just like “fail-safe-mode-with-network”. Nobody wants to recover from remote backup but that is the ideal life. Thanks. Fred --- s

RE: [smartos-discuss] enable network/physical in noinstall/recovery?

Yeah. That is doable. But because there is no zpool imported, network/physical can’t be started. And a lot of protocols can’t run neither. Thanks. Fred From: Jorge Schrauwen [mailto:sjorge...@blackdot.be] Sent: 星期五, 二月 19, 2016 19:21 To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org Cc: Fred Liu Subject

RE: [smartos-discuss] the partition size is fixed 1.86G in USB stick. Can it be enlarged?

e made the image 8GB and a person had lots of 4GB sticks lying around etc.) -Nahum On 02/18/2016 08:10 PM, Fred Liu wrote: I have got no success with gparted. Thanks. Fred Sent from Outlook Mobile<https://aka.ms/sdimjr> _ From: Jorge Schrauwen mailto:sjorg

RE: [smartos-discuss] enable network/physical in noinstall/recovery?

[Fred]: Hm, what is your way to restore a bad zpool like zones? Thanks. Fred On 02/19/2016 08:03 AM, Fred Liu wrote: Yeah. That is doable. But because there is no zpool imported, network/physical can’t be started. And a lot of protocols can’t run neither.   Thanks.   Fred From: Jorge Schr

[smartos-discuss] passing SSH keys to the LX brand zone

Hi, It looks like adding following “customer_metadat” section in json manifest won’t work. "customer_metadata": { "root_authorized_keys": "ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EBIwAAAQEA8aQRt2JAgq6jpQOT5nukO8gI0Vst+EmBtwBz6gnRjQ4Jw8pERLlMAsa7jxmr5yzRA7Ji8M/kxGLbMHJnINdw/TBP1mCBJ49TjDpobzztGO9icro3337o

[smartos-discuss] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built

Hi, Today when I was reading Jeff's new nuclear weapon -- DSSD D5's CUBIC RAID introduction, the interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built popped in my brain. For zfs doesn't support nested vdev, the maximum fault tolerance should be three(from raidz3). It is stranded

[smartos-discuss] RE: [zfs] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built

; smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org Subject: Re: [zfs] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built On Mar 3, 2016 8:36 PM, "Fred Liu" mailto:fred_...@issi.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Today when I was reading Jeff's new nuclear weapon -- DSS

Re: [developer] Re: [smartos-discuss] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built

2016-03-06 22:49 GMT+08:00 Richard Elling : > > On Mar 3, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Fred Liu wrote: > > Hi, > > Today when I was reading Jeff's new nuclear weapon -- DSSD D5's CUBIC RAID > introduction, > the interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you ha

[smartos-discuss] Re: [zfs] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built

2016-03-05 0:01 GMT+08:00 Freddie Cash : > On Mar 4, 2016 2:05 AM, "Fred Liu" wrote: > > 2016-03-04 13:47 GMT+08:00 Freddie Cash : > >> > >> Currently, I just use a simple coordinate system. Columns are letters, > rows are numbers. > >> &quo

Re: [smartos-discuss] Samsung 950 Pro on SmartOS?

2016-03-05 21:19 GMT+08:00 Dirk Steinberg : > > Apart from that: is NVMe support in SmartOS considered stable? > > > There is driver support for it in the system. I have not heard many > reports positively or negatively about it. > > [Fred]: I am testing some Intel P3600 NVMe SSD. In normal worklo

Re: [zfs] [developer] Re: [smartos-discuss] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built

2016-03-07 14:04 GMT+08:00 Richard Elling : > > On Mar 6, 2016, at 9:06 PM, Fred Liu wrote: > > > > 2016-03-06 22:49 GMT+08:00 Richard Elling < > richard.ell...@richardelling.com>: > >> >> On Mar 3, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Fred Liu wrote: >> >>

[smartos-discuss] Re: [zfs] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built

2016-03-07 13:55 GMT+08:00 Julian Elischer : > On 6/03/2016 9:30 PM, Fred Liu wrote: >> >> 2016-03-05 0:01 GMT+08:00 Freddie Cash : >> >>> On Mar 4, 2016 2:05 AM, "Fred Liu" wrote: >>>> >>>> 2016-03-04 13:47 GMT+08:00 Freddie Cas

Re: [zfs] [developer] Re: [smartos-discuss] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built

2016-03-08 4:55 GMT+08:00 Liam Slusser : > I don't have a 2000 drive array (thats amazing!) but I do have two 280 > drive arrays which are in production. Here are the generic stats: > > server setup: > OpenIndiana oi_151 > 1 server rack > Dell r720xd 64g ram with mirrored 250g boot disks > 5 x LS

RE: [smartos-discuss] Samsung 950 Pro on SmartOS?

From: Dirk Steinberg [mailto:d...@steinbergnet.net] Sent: 星期三, 三月 09, 2016 0:06 To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] Samsung 950 Pro on SmartOS? Am 07.03.2016 um 06:48 schrieb Fred Liu : 2016-03-05 21:19 GMT+08:00 Dirk Steinberg : > Apart from that: is N

RE: [zfs] [developer] Re: [smartos-discuss] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built

Gotcha! From: Liam Slusser [mailto:lslus...@gmail.com] Sent: 星期三, 三月 09, 2016 8:05 To: z...@lists.illumos.org Cc: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org; develo...@lists.open-zfs.org; developer; illumos-developer; omnios-discuss; Discussion list for OpenIndiana; zfs-disc...@list.zfsonlinux.org; freeb

RE: [smartos-discuss] How to mount different zfs volumn to the same lx branded zone

From: Ian Collins [mailto:i...@ianshome.com] Sent: 星期日, 三月 13, 2016 4:08 To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] How to mount different zfs volumn to the same lx branded zone On 03/12/16 22:49, Fred Liu wrote: It seems hardware pass-through is not applicable in

RE: [smartos-discuss] How to mount different zfs volumn to the same lx branded zone

From: Fred Liu [mailto:fred_...@issi.com] Sent: 星期六, 三月 12, 2016 17:50 To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org; smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] How to mount different zfs volumn to the same lx branded zone It seems hardware pass-through is not applicable in

RE: [smartos-discuss] How to mount different zfs volumn to the same lx branded zone

From: Jorge Schrauwen [mailto:sjorge...@blackdot.be] Sent: 星期六, 三月 12, 2016 19:37 To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org Cc: 王靖 Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] How to mount different zfs volumn to the same lx branded zone Yes, it will work as long as the zone is on the same server as the data.

RE: [smartos-discuss] Imaging LX brand zones

I usually build form source if I want to try a custom image. The instructions are pretty clear. [Fred]: The output dir is like following after a successful building: bash-4.1$ pwd /home/fliu/smartos-live/output -bash-4.1$ ls -la total 158393 drwxr-xr-x 3 fliu fliu 8 Feb 24 19:45 .

[smartos-discuss] kernel zone

Hi, Not sure if illumos is design strictly by backward compatibility. That means applications built on older illumos can still run on newer illumos. For there has been short history of smartos, the older OS images can still run well in the current SmartOS release. But in long-term, will the use

[smartos-discuss] RE: kernel zone

From: Fred Liu Sent: 星期三, 三月 16, 2016 20:06 To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org Cc: illumos-developer Subject: kernel zone Hi, Not sure if illumos is designed strictly by backward compatibility. That means applications built on older illumos  can still run on newer illumos. For there has

[smartos-discuss] RE: [developer] HBA recommended except LSI and ARECA

> -Original Message- > From: Fred Liu > Sent: 星期二, 五月 06, 2014 12:22 > To: Zhiwen Zheng; Keith Wesolowski > Cc: omnios-disc...@lists.omniti.com; Discussion list for OpenIndiana; Fred > Liu; > develo...@lists.illumos.org; smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Subj

[smartos-discuss] Any possibilities in python OSError?

Hi, We are running some python scripts in LX brand (CentOS 6.7 20151005). And we get following errors: File "/tool/iqs/bin/execd.py", line 416, in polljob runfiles = [int(f) for f in os.listdir(RUNDIR) if f.isdigit()] exceptions.OSError: [Errno 4] Interrupted system call: '/tool/iqs/run' T

[smartos-discuss] Re: Any possibilities in python OSError?

here is no obvious lag in coming nfs-related operations. And further, we find if SmartOS where LX brands are living in serve nfs service, the lag won't appear. It could be something happened in network path. Thanks. 2016-05-16 18:07 GMT+08:00 Fred Liu : > Hi, > > We are running s

Re: [smartos-discuss] Re: Any possibilities in python OSError?

2016-05-16 21:44 GMT+08:00 Richard Elling : > >> On May 16, 2016, at 3:40 AM, Fred Liu wrote: >> >> It could be the slow read from the nfs path -- "/tool/iqs/run". >> We see nfs v4 client not working in LX brand(I have already opened OS-5265). >> And

[smartos-discuss] Do system V init scripts work in LX Brand?

Hi, I have no success to boot the system V init scripts. Any success here? Thanks. Fred --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify

Re: [smartos-discuss] Do system V init scripts work in LX Brand?

2016-05-17 14:32 GMT+08:00 Joshua M. Clulow : > On 16 May 2016 at 23:29, Fred Liu wrote: >> I have no success to boot the system V init scripts. >> Any success here? > > Can you give us a bit more detail about what you're doing? Is this a > custom script you have add

Re: [smartos-discuss] Do system V init scripts work in LX Brand?

2016-05-17 15:10 GMT+08:00 Chris Ridd : > >> On 17 May 2016, at 07:40, Fred Liu wrote: >> >> 2016-05-17 14:32 GMT+08:00 Joshua M. Clulow : >>> On 16 May 2016 at 23:29, Fred Liu wrote: >>>> I have no success to boot the system V init scripts. >>&g

Re: [smartos-discuss] Do system V init scripts work in LX Brand?

2016-05-17 15:41 GMT+08:00 Chris Ridd : > >> On 17 May 2016, at 08:25, Fred Liu wrote: >> >> 2016-05-17 15:10 GMT+08:00 Chris Ridd : >>> >>>> On 17 May 2016, at 07:40, Fred Liu wrote: >>>> >>>> 2016-05-17 14:32 GMT+08:00 Joshua M.

Re: [smartos-discuss] Do system V init scripts work in LX Brand?

2016-05-17 16:30 GMT+08:00 Fred Liu : > 2016-05-17 15:41 GMT+08:00 Chris Ridd : >> >>> On 17 May 2016, at 08:25, Fred Liu wrote: >>> >>> 2016-05-17 15:10 GMT+08:00 Chris Ridd : >>>> >>>>> On 17 May 2016, at 07:40, Fred Liu

RE: [smartos-discuss] Re: Any possibilities in python OSError?

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@richardelling.com] > Sent: 星期一, 五月 16, 2016 21:45 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] Re: Any possibilities in python OSError? > > > > On May 16, 2016,

[smartos-discuss] test

--- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-

[smartos-discuss] Any possibilities in python OSError?

Hi, We are running some python scripts in LX brand ((CentOS 6.7 20151005). And we get following errors: File "/tool/iqs/bin/execd.py", line 416, in polljob runfiles = [int(f) for f in os.listdir(RUNDIR) if f.isdigit()] exceptions.OSError: [Errno 4] Interrupted system call: '/tool/iqs/run'

RE: [smartos-discuss] Samsung 950 Pro on SmartOS?

> -Original Message- > From: Fred Liu > Sent: 星期三, 三月 09, 2016 13:02 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Cc: illumos-developer > Subject: RE: [smartos-discuss] Samsung 950 Pro on SmartOS? > > > > From: Dirk Steinberg [mailto:d...@steinbergnet.net]

RE: [smartos-discuss] SmartOS release-20160901

> -Original Message- > From: Trent Mick [mailto:trent.m...@joyent.com] > Sent: 星期五, 九月 02, 2016 6:11 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Subject: [smartos-discuss] SmartOS release-20160901 > > Hello All, > > The latest bi-weekly "release" branch build of SmartOS is up: > > cu

[smartos-discuss] enable services in smartos

Hi It looks nis/client has been added as a dependency in 20160901 but not in 20160527 like following; uname -a SunOS pluto 5.11 joyent_20160901T054050Z i86pc i386 i86pc svcs -l name-services fmri svc:/milestone/name-services:default name name services milestone enabled true

RE: [smartos-discuss] enable services in smartos

> -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Perkin [mailto:jper...@joyent.com] > Sent: 星期二, 十月 18, 2016 17:33 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] enable services in smartos > > * On 2016-10-18 at 10:19 BST, Fred Liu wrote: > >

RE: [smartos-discuss] SmartOS release-20161013

> -Original Message- > From: Trent Mick [mailto:trent.m...@joyent.com] > Sent: 星期五, 十月 14, 2016 5:35 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Subject: [smartos-discuss] SmartOS release-20161013 > > Hello All, > > The latest bi-weekly "release" branch build of SmartOS is up: > > cu

[smartos-discuss] any supoorted in Mellanox HBA in illumos?

Hi, Please post if you know. Thanks. Fred --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/m

[smartos-discuss] RE: [OmniOS-discuss] any supoorted in Mellanox HBA in illumos?

This is encouraging! Thanks. Fred > -Original Message- > From: wo...@4amlunch.net [mailto:wo...@4amlunch.net] > Sent: 星期三, 十一月 30, 2016 20:04 > To: Fred Liu > Cc: omnios-disc...@lists.omniti.com; smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org; > Discussion list for O

[smartos-discuss] vnc resolution configurable?

Hi, We noticed that GUI since SL7.2 did not work with the low resolution 1024x768 which is the default-detected resolution from SmartOS vnc server. Is there a way to configure the vnc to run in higher resolution like 1280x1024? And I don't need to hack Linux to forcedly run in higher resolution.

RE: [smartos-discuss] vnc resolution configurable?

ress from my previous > employer. Okay, let's jump in. > > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:47 AM, Fred Liu <mailto:fred_...@issi.com> > wrote: > > > We noticed that GUI since SL7.2 did not work with the low resolution > 1024x768 which is the default-detecte

[smartos-discuss] vnic mac address updatable?

Hi, Sorry, if there is already answer. From crossbow heritage, this property should be configurable just like what I am doing in LDOM of Solaris. What is the reason why it is not applicable in smartos? The main purpose here is to migrate legacy hardware. Thanks. Fred ---

RE: [smartos-discuss] vnic mac address updatable?

> -Original Message- > From: Johan Claesson [mailto:jo...@jobetech.se] > Sent: 星期四, 一月 05, 2017 20:01 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] vnic mac address updatable? > > 2017-01-05 04:32 skrev Fred Liu: > > Hi, > > &

[smartos-discuss] rotate-kvm-log

Hi, I am running joyent_20161013T025521Z now. It seems in this version rotate-kvm-log is done by cron not logadm. But I also noticed when a kvm instance was created there was a corresponding entry occurred in /var/logadm/timestamp like following: "/zones/c3f09892-f36e-4784-9853-b4ceb3e762da/root

Re: [smartos-discuss] rotate-kvm-log

But there is nothing about rotate-kvm-log in /etc/logadm.conf from stock. It is weird. How were these entries had been added in time stamp? It should be logadm command invoking. But where was it invoked? I haven't done it manually. Fred Get Outlook for iOS On Tue, Ap

RE: [smartos-discuss] rotate-kvm-log

>From: Josh Wilsdon [mailto:jwils...@joyent.com] >It doesn't go in logadm.conf. The rotation happens via the  >/usr/vm/sbin/rotate-kvm-logs.sh script which is run by root's crontab in the >GZ. Yes. But "/usr/vm/sbin/rotate-kvm-logs.sh script" won't add entries in "/var/logadm/timestamps" like

RE: [smartos-discuss] rotate-kvm-log

>From: Josh Wilsdon [mailto:jwils...@joyent.com] >Sent: 星期三, 四月 12, 2017 0:25 >To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org >Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] rotate-kvm-log >Yes. But "/usr/vm/sbin/rotate-kvm-logs.sh script" won't add entries in >"/var/logadm/timestamps" like following:   >"/zones/c3f0

RE: [smartos-discuss] rotate-kvm-log

> > Hi Fred, > > That'll only be true if the KVM VM is never booted. Whenever it is booted, the > file will be non-empty until it is rotated since there are always messages > written to the log when a KVM VM boots. > All of my KVM VMs are definitely running now. I think It came from the 'copy

[smartos-discuss] add device to OS/LX zone

Hi, For I have no spare hardware(disk), I have tried adding zvol to OS/LX zone. But it looks likes not working as the document. zonecfg:f58e8c87-eb04-ea48-bf23-9b7be32515b8:device> set match=/dev/zvol/rdsk/zones/device zonecfg:f58e8c87-eb04-ea48-bf23-9b7be32515b8:device> end zonecfg:f58e8c87-eb0

Re: [smartos-discuss] add device to OS/LX zone

es) vmtype: OS listable: no create: yes update: yes (requires zone reboot to take effect) Regards Jorge On 2018-02-27 13:41, Fred Liu wrote: > Hi, > > For I have no spare hardware(disk), I have tried adding zvol to OS/LX > zone. But it l

Re: [smartos-discuss] add device to OS/LX zone

le you called newfs, which creates a new UFS file system. I think if you don't create a filesystem on it and use it as a raw block device it should just work. This is what qemu does when running inside a KVM branded zone. Regards Jorge On 2018-02-27 14:05, Fred Liu wrote: Actually?we ne

RE: [smartos-discuss] Migration KVM to Bhyve - Performance Issues

> -Original Message- > From: Brian Bennett [mailto:brian.benn...@joyent.com] > Sent: 星期日, 五月 27, 2018 2:14 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] Migration KVM to Bhyve - Performance Issues > > On May 26, 2018, at 6:57 AM, Humberto Ramirez

Re: [smartos-discuss] Smartos bhyve support on AMD Sun Fire X4140

Even Ryzen-based ? Thanks Fred On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:56 AM +0800, "Jorge Schrauwen" mailto:sjorge...@blackdot.be>> wrote: Yeah, no support as of yet. Although there does seem to be some interest in adding it eventually. (Based on conversations on IRC) July 3, 2018 6:38 PM, "J?n Poctave

[smartos-discuss] *brainstorm* -- orchestate VM boots

Hi, Not sure there are already similar discussions here. As far as I know, if I just reboot smartos, the server will *simultaneously* boot all the VMs in running status before the reboot. That will give the following issues: 1): huge io pressure on storage. It will take longer time to finalize a

[smartos-discuss] avx2

Hi, I know qemu version on smartos is out of date. So kvm vm won’t have avx2 instruction set by now. Will bhyve vm have them? Thanks. Fred --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now Modify Your Subscription: https:

[smartos-discuss] hacking grub to enable smartos booting from multi-version.

Hi, It seems my grub only work with the fixed path name like "/platform/" and it cannot work with different name like "/platform-xxx/". Is it possible to switch to different versions? Thanks. Fred --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.lis

Re: [smartos-discuss] hacking grub to enable smartos booting from multi-version.

Daniel， Can you post the detailed configuration about your iPXE? Thanks. Fred 发件人: Daniel Malon [daniel.ma...@me.com] 发送时间: 2014年4月29日 4:34 收件人: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org; Fred Liu 主题: Re: [smartos-discuss] hacking grub to enable smartos

[smartos-discuss] failed to add cache device

Hi, I failed to add cache device like following: [root@00-25-90-74-f5-04 ~]# zpool add zones cache c0t50015179596E5EB1d0p1 Assertion failed: rchildren == 2, file zpool_vdev.c, line 641 Abort (core dumped) [root@00-25-90-74-f5-04 ~]# uname -a SunOS 00-25-90-74-f5-04 5.11 joyent_20140418T031241Z i86

[smartos-discuss] RE: [developer] HBA recommended except LSI and ARECA

Is 6805H/6405H(http://www.adaptec.com//en-us/products/series/6h/) worthy of recommendation too? Thanks. Fred > -Original Message- > From: Keith Wesolowski [mailto:keith.wesolow...@joyent.com] > Sent: 星期四, 五月 01, 2014 0:29 > To: Fred Liu > Cc: develo...@lists.illumos.or

[smartos-discuss] Re: [developer] HBA recommended except LSI and ARECA

Keith Wesolowski via smartos-discuss 于2014年5月1日星期四写道： > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:13:49AM -0700, Fred Liu wrote: > > > Is 6805H/6405H(http://www.adaptec.com//en-us/products/series/6h/) > worthy of recommendation too? > > That uses the PM8001, which I believe is the sa

[smartos-discuss] Re: [developer] HBA recommended except LSI and ARECA

Keith Wesolowski 于2014年5月1日星期四写道： > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 02:13:38AM +0800, Fred Liu wrote: > > > > That uses the PM8001, which I believe is the same ASIC I have direct > > > experience with. So it would be good to look at too, yes. > > > > > > [fr

[smartos-discuss] Working backplane/enclosure for SES in mass non-Solaris/fishwork-ZFS deployment

I post here for I don't know where the largest non-Solaris/fishwork-ZFS deployment in the world is. But Joyent provide cloud service. The people from their datacenters must play bunch of disks everyday. As long as I know, only dataON+nexenta(http://www.dataonstorage.com/dataon-solutions/nexenta/

Re: [smartos-discuss] Working backplane/enclosure for SES in mass non-Solaris/fishwork-ZFS deployment

Robert Mustacchi via smartos-discuss 于2014年5月10日星期六写道： > On 5/9/14 18:01 , Fred Liu via smartos-discuss wrote: > > I post here for I don't know where the largest non-Solaris/fishwork-ZFS > deployment in the world is. But Joyent provide cloud service. The people > from their d

RE: [smartos-discuss] Working backplane/enclosure for SES in mass non-Solaris/fishwork-ZFS deployment

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@richardelling.com] > Sent: 星期六, 五月 10, 2014 21:53 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org; Robert Mustacchi > Cc: Fred Liu > Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] Working backplane/enclosure for SES in

[smartos-discuss] ntp service cannot be started in 20140627T001506Z

[root@00-25-90-74-f5-04 ~]# uname -a SunOS 00-25-90-74-f5-04 5.11 joyent_20140627T001506Z i86pc i386 i86pc [root@00-25-90-74-f5-04 ~]# svcs -xv svc:/network/ntp:default (Network Time Protocol (NTP) Version 4) State: maintenance since June 30, 2014 09:05:39 PM CST Reason: Start method exited with $

RE: [smartos-discuss] ntp service cannot be started in 20140627T001506Z

> Why did it enter maintenance? Check the log with svcs -L. [ Jun 30 22:10:43 Enabled. ] [ Jun 30 22:10:43 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/ntp start"). ] Error: Servers/peers specified but none is reachable. [ Jun 30 22:10:58 Method "start" exited with status 96. ] Fred

RE: [smartos-discuss] ntp service cannot be started in 20140627T001506Z

> > > Why did it enter maintenance? Check the log with svcs -L. > > [ Jun 30 22:10:43 Enabled. ] > [ Jun 30 22:10:43 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/ntp > start"). ] > Error: Servers/peers specified but none is reachable. > [ Jun 30 22:10:58 Method "start" exited with status 96. ] > [

RE: [smartos-discuss] ntp service cannot be started in 20140627T001506Z

It looks the NTP service is NOT OK on these three static IPs. Why not use a FQDN like pool.ntp.org in the configuration? > -Original Message- > From: Fred Liu > Sent: 星期一, 六月 30, 2014 22:50 > To: 'smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org'; Fred Liu; Robert Mustacchi &

RE: [smartos-discuss] ntp service cannot be started in 20140627T001506Z

> Distributors of NTP-enabled operating systems are generally not > permitted to use the bare "pool.ntp.org" DNS name in any default NTP > configurations[1]. To this end, I have been arranging a SmartOS- > specific DNS name with the NTP Pool Project that we _can_ use. > Hopefully this will be the

RE: [smartos-discuss] feeding HPET (High Precision Event Timer) to smartOS's KVM to address windows vm clock drift issue

As good finding, after patching win2008r2 to the latest, the clock drift is acceptable. > -Original Message- > From: Fred Liu > Sent: 星期二, 十二月 24, 2013 20:11 > To: smartos-discuss@lists.smartos.org > Subject: RE: [smartos-discuss] feeding HPET (High Precision Event Timer)