Re: [smartos-discuss] (Possibly OT) Joyent pkgsrc

2017-05-19 Thread Jonathan Perkin
* On 2017-05-19 at 02:50 BST, Matthew Parsons wrote: > Now I know enough for this particular area, but using bug reports to ask > preliminary questions always strikes me as...sub-optimal. A general > discussion area/list/something is preferable in my mind. (And is typically > easier to search for

Re: [smartos-discuss] (Possibly OT) Joyent pkgsrc

2017-05-18 Thread Matthew Parsons
Thanks for being responsive. Now I know enough for this particular area, but using bug reports to ask preliminary questions always strikes me as...sub-optimal. A general discussion area/list/something is preferable in my mind. (And is typically easier to search for those kind of questions.) For in

Re: [smartos-discuss] (Possibly OT) Joyent pkgsrc

2017-05-18 Thread Robert Mustacchi
On 5/17/17 23:01 , Matthew Parsons wrote: > (Usual disclaimers, but I've scoured pkgsrc.joyent.com for info, so > possibly could use some fixing) > > Is this the best place to report issues/requests with your packages? While Filip is already digging into the specifics of the case, the best place

Re: [smartos-discuss] (Possibly OT) Joyent pkgsrc

2017-05-18 Thread Filip Hajny
> 18. 5. 2017 v 8:01, Matthew Parsons : > > (Usual disclaimers, but I've scoured pkgsrc.joyent.com for info, so possibly > could use some fixing) > > Is this the best place to report issues/requests with your packages? > > I was looking for "fio" that is listed at > http://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/p