Hello Fox,Thomas,
I might ad that for a long while it has been a common recommendation
for SNF to be weighted at 70-80% of your "hold" weight. Quite often,
some result categories are weighted to hold on their own.
These days blackhats are using a burst-mode delivery tactic that makes
it virtually
Hello Steve,
This is an important point. Most of the image spam rules and in
particular "abstract heuristics" are coded to the experimental rule
group. The name implies only that these rules are not direct matches
for components of the message (singly or in combination) as are most
other rules - R
Hello Rick,
Wednesday, September 20, 2006, 8:34:55 AM, you wrote:
> I just signed my annual renewal for Sniffer but it seems that it used to
> catch lots of the email and now is only catching about 50% of the email Why
> when we are sending in our information does this continue to happen? We are
Hi Rick,
I've found that tuning for spam is a constant process. I am always
tweaking settings, changing weights, etc., in response to spam
leakage.
Just yesterday I spent about 2 hours on it.
I (very reluctantly) implemented some phrase filtering, using the
filter function in Declude. I've been
On Sep 20, 2006, at 5:34 AM, Rick Hogue wrote:I just signed my annual renewal for Sniffer but it seems that it used to catch lots of the email and now is only catching about 50% of the email Why when we are sending in our information does this continue to happen? We are getting lots of you won, Pha
We've been very happy putting invURIBL into the mix :)
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Darin Cox
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:11 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer does not catch as mu
Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer does not catch as much as it used to.
Hi Rick,
It's a constant battle, with spammers getting more sophisticated, and
filtering tools trying to catch up and anticipate the next move.
That said, we do not see the kind of leakage you see, probably due to
Hi Rick,
It's a constant battle, with spammers getting more sophisticated, and
filtering tools trying to catch up and anticipate the next move.
That said, we do not see the kind of leakage you see, probably due to other
tests we run on our systems. I would recommend you supplement with BLs and
o
