nd see how my system reacts.
>
> Goran Jovanovic
> Omega Network Solutions
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
> > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 11:39 AM
> > To: sniffe
03
Server?
Thanks,
Joe
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Goran Jovanovic"
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] When to go persistent
On Thursday, February 23, 2006, 11:30:02 AM, Goran wrote:
GJ> Hi,
e-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 11:39 AM
> To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
> Subject: RE: [sniffer] When to go persistent
>
> Goran, I'd be interested in Pete's technical answer
On Thursday, February 23, 2006, 11:30:02 AM, Goran wrote:
GJ> Hi,
GJ> Is there any good rule of thumb, in terms of messages processed per
GJ> minute/hour/day when you should move to a persistent instance of
GJ> Sniffer?
I would suggest using the persistent mode unless you have a reason not
to. (
Goran, I'd be interested in Pete's technical answer, too.
The practical answer is that you should always go with the persistent
instance of Message Sniffer. From reading Pete's previous screeds and
monitoring the list here in the last year and from having my own
troubles, it's pretty clear to me
