devices having same
> security name that will be executed on threads at a time. Also is it
> mandatory to get engineid if user name is same for all devices? If so why?
>
> Thanks
> -Senthil
>
>
>> On 4/18/15, 2:04 AM, "Frank Fock" wrote:
>>
>>
Hi Senthil,
How do you get/determine the engine ID in your functions doGet1 parameter list?
It must be different for those two devices and it has to be their authoritative
engine ID.
Best regards,
Frank
> On 17 Apr 2015, at 23:24, Senthil Murugan Ramalingam -X (seramali - UNISH
> CORPORATION
Hi,
Simply set the snmpCommunityName in the snmpCommunityTable.
To be able to do this at runtime, you need the latest SNMP4J-Agent
version 2.3.2
which has been released today.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 23.03.2015 um 23:49 schrieb Pradipmaya Maharana:
I am writing a snmp agent based on the sampl
Hi Shraddha,
You can simply add a TransportMapping to the Snmp instance you are using
with a local port set (instead of 0).
Best regards,
Frank
> On 23 Mar 2015, at 19:13, Shraddha Herlekar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to force SNMP agent to use a particular port to send out
> SNMP v2
Hi Greg,
You can find the supported RFCs here:
http://oosnmp.net/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=5799943
Best regards,
Frank
Am 19.03.2015 um 23:12 schrieb Geilfuss, Greg:
I'm investigating SNMP4J to determine if it's right for my application's needs.
RFC 6353 support is required.
__
ank for your quick response. Great support.
>
> Can you please throw more light on Cisco specific protocols provided by
> SNMP4J for AES 196 and above. If possible pls share any sample code for
> AES196 using Cisco specific protocols provided by SNMP4J.
>
> Thanks
> -Sen
>
Hi Sen,
For Cisco devices you need to use the Cisco specific protocols provided by
SNMP4J for AES 196 and above. Cisco implemented a different key handling than
the proposed IETF protocols. Unfortunately there is no standard defined
Best regards
Frank
> Am 18.03.2015 um 00:13 schrieb Senthi
Hi Syed,
All value up to 2^32-1 are supported. In Java, the values will become
negative above 2^31, but that has to be handled by your code.
The string conversion should work as expected and also the OID.compareTo
will work correctly.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 04.03.2015 um 02:30 schrieb Ali, S
not too much to ask then can you please put it as step by step
approach.
Regards,
Nitin Kumar Sharma.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Frank Fock <mailto:f...@agentpp.com>> wrote:
Hi Nitin,
SNMP4J-Agent includes a sample simulation agent whose content can
be set via SNMP
Hi Nitin,
SNMP4J-Agent includes a sample simulation agent whose content can be set via
SNMP. I think that is all you are looking for.
Best regards
Frank
> Am 17.02.2015 um 22:51 schrieb nitin sharma :
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to build a SNMP simulator for my project and i have been given
>
Hi Shivi,
A PDU can be easily encoded to an BER byte stream which represents exactly the
SNMP message.
Then you only have to add the IP header and compute payload length etc. and you
are done.
Best regards.
Frank
> On 13 Feb 2015, at 04:47, Shivi Goel -X (shivigoe - NICHEPRO TECHNOLOGIES
>
> SNMP4J mailing list
> SNMP4J@agentpp.org
> https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
AGENT++
Frank Fock
https://agentpp.com
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
<http://snmp.software/>
Best regards,
Frank Fock
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
Hi Nitin,
Please find my answers inline below:
> On 25 Jan 2015, at 22:19, nitin sharma wrote:
>
> Hi team,
>
> I trying to build a SNMP agent and so far been able to built one with the
> help of java code available on net (i.e. by extending BaseAgent class).
>
>
> I would like to know
>
>
Hi Imene,
(V3) traps can be sent without implementing a command responder SNMP entity
(=agent).
Nevertheless, I would recommend to implement an agent, because SNMP favours the
trap-directed-polling
pattern, where a trap receiver periodically polls key MIB objects to detect
failures or alarm co
Hence, i would like to decode the incoming request, and based upon the input,
> change my response and send back to server.
>
> Regards,
> Nitin Kumar Sharma.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Frank Fock <mailto:f...@agentpp.com>> wrote:
> Hi Nitin,
>
&
Hi Nitin,
Wha is your goal? Writing a SNMP agent?
Then you should use SNMP4J-Agent on top of SNMP4J.
Beginning writing a SNMP agent with SNMP4J from scratch needs a lot of SNMP
know how.
SNMP4J-Agent already implements most of complex agent stuff.
But finally, what is the printing for?
Best r
ID is used
instead.
Best regards,
Frank
>
> Thanks,
> Imene.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Fock [mailto:f...@agentpp.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 6:31 PM
> To: Boussour, Imene (6076618)
> Cc: snmp4j@agentpp.org
> Subject: Re: [SNMP4
Hi Imene,
Your understanding of SNMPv3 trap sending is not correct.
SNMPv3 notifications (traps) are sent from a command responder
entity and are therefore authoritative. That means, the sender
(which is the command responder entity) uses its own security
engine ID within the notification PDU.
Hi Brijesh,
You misunderstood me, not the security name is the problem source, instead
there are two or more SNMP devices that use the same engine ID (which is
not allowed/supported by SNMPv3).
Best regards,
Frank
Am 19.12.2014 12:26, schrieb Brijesh Kumar:
Hi Frank,
Yes i am using same securi
OK, then you hit an FAQ. As you are using the same security name
for all the devices, it is essential (in other cases too, but you will not
see the negative results that early) that you have a unique engine ID
for each device. This is an absolut requirement by SNMPv3.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 19.1
От: SNMP4J [snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org] от имени Dmitrii Krendelev
[krende...@netcracker.com]
Отправлено: 18 декабря 2014 г. 23:22
Кому: Frank Fock; snmp4j@agentpp.org
Тема: [SNMP4J] HA: [BugReport][SNMP4J-2.2.3] Concurrency bugin
Hi Brijesh,
If you get an unsupportedSecurityLevel error, then you specified a
security level that is not supported
by your USM configuration. Basically, you will have to provide either a
privacy password and a
authentication password for the corresponding protocols in the
configuration.
Bes
Hi Dimitrii,
When an InterruptedException is thrown in wait() it will be catched and
a new interrupt()
will be triggered. If not handled, the TaskManager continues in the loop
but then finally
calls wait() again, if no TaskManager is there to handle the task.
I do not see any problem with the
Hello Krystian,
There are several errors (misunderstandings) in the code you posted.
Please completely rewrite it. I suggest using AgenPro to generate
your stub code from a MIB to get a consistent implementation for
the corresponding MIB specification.
The major issues are:
1. The tables have il
Hi Smurti,
The MessageDispatcherImpl class has the method
http://www.snmp4j.org/doc/org/snmp4j/MessageDispatcherImpl.html#addAuthenticationFailureListener(org.snmp4j.event.AuthenticationFailureListener)
to register a listener for authentication failure requests.
Since locking the agent can be us
ing unusual (or maybe flawed)
> about the remote Agent. Is that a reasonable interpretation?
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Frank Fock wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>> This error is not related to the transport or IP layer. This is an error
>> that is report
Hi David,
This error is not related to the transport or IP layer. This is an error that
is reported by the command responder when the received PDU is longer than the
local constraints which might be any message length between 484 and 65535 bytes.
Best regards
Frank
Am 12.11.2014 um 14:31 schri
Hi Shivi,
Although the SNMP stanard discourages usage of inband source addresses,
you can use the snmpTrapAddress from the SNMP-COMMUNITY-MIB as additional
object to all the proxied traps.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 11.11.2014 07:47, schrieb Shivi Goel -X (shivigoe - NICHEPRO
TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE
Hello George,
A restart is not necessary, of course. Most likely you did not properly re-add
the necessary entries?
Why are you changing so many things just to change the security level?
Best regards,
Frank
> On 06 Nov 2014, at 04:59, George Bachus wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am in the process
Hi Narendra,
You may post bug reports and feature requests anytime here on the
mailing list.
Direct code contribution is not possible, because of security and copyright
considerations.
As SNMP4J has a very open and object oriented design, missing features or
applications, can be easily added as
Hi Mark,
JDK 1.6 and probably also your Eclipse version have a compiler bug
regarding
certain usage of Generics. To fix it, you have to use an JDK 7 compiler and
then set the compliance level to 1.6 (if you need to).
The bug is well documented at Oracle and was an architecture problem with
the
s used
* for the SNMP4J 2.0.1 problem at our customer, it's JDK 7u06
We'll test with the patch that you provided.
Thanks,
Peter.
On 27/10/2014 8:35, Frank Fock wrote:
Hi Peter,
Operarting system and JDK version (including whether it is a Oracle
or 3rd party JRE) would be helpful
t
2.3.0 and 2.3.1 tests, JDK 7u45 is used
* for the SNMP4J 2.0.1 problem at our customer, it's JDK 7u06
We'll test with the patch that you provided.
Thanks,
Peter.
On 27/10/2014 8:35, Frank Fock wrote:
Hi Peter,
Operarting system and JDK version (including whether it is a Oracle
or
older release of our
product).
Best regards,
Peter.
On 24/10/2014 2:16, Frank Fock wrote:
Hi Peter,
Please update to the latest version. There have been several fixes
about race conditions
in the Snmp class regarding retries and the PduHandleCallback. The
current implementation
seems to b
Hi Randika,
A USM entry without an engine ID is no "valid" user entry itself, because
such an entry must be associated with a security engine ID in all cases.
SNMPv3 users however, do not want to remember (and configure)
the security engine IDs of all managed devices.
Using "template" USM entrie
Hi Peter,
Please update to the latest version. There have been several fixes about
race conditions
in the Snmp class regarding retries and the PduHandleCallback. The
current implementation
seems to be OK regarding handling of the Message IDs and the MPv3 Cache
WeakHashMap.
Best regards,
Fran
SNMPv2MIB SysOREntry.
* Fixed: Cast in line 630 to include row class parameter:
MOMutableTableModel mmodel = (MOMutableTableModel)model;
* Fixed [SFJ-94]: Fixed DefaultMOServer.unregister method for provided
context.
Best regards,
Frank Fock
--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen
Today's Topics:
1. Question regarding request id when doing getnext (Mátyás Kuti)
2. Re: Question regarding request id when doing getnext (Frank Fock)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:23:01 +0200
From: Mátyá
Hi David,
SNMP4J does not implement "transmit pacing" because in (pure) Java you
cannot get any
information of the UDP buffer usage. Slowing down the sending of
messages in general
will not be acceptable for 99% of the users and use cases.
To be able to control burst sending of messages, man
Hi,
You cannot expect anything from a request ID other than it is unique
as long as the agent is running (and the range of available numbers
is not exhausted).
SNMP4J (currently) also generates an ID for each response which has the
advantage, that even if the response cannot be fully parsed, it
Hi John,
The SNMP4J trap listener is already responding to INFORM requests
as required by the SNMP(v3) standard. The standard requires the
protocol level to respond the INFORM request. It is thus not the
application that is responding.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 20.09.2014 00:10, schrieb John Money
Hi Jacky,
The ManagedObject implementations MOScalar and DefaultMOTable of
SNMP4J-Agent already provide an in-memory
"database" for MIB data. That data can also be persistently saved to a
file using the a ready-to-use mechanism.
There several approaches to instrument a SNMP4J-Agent. I always
Hi Vince,
From the SNMP(4J) point of view, such a exception (error) does not exists.
It seems that this exception was invented be someoneelse. So we cannot
help.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 11.09.2014 08:34, schrieb Vince Zeng:
Hi guys,
For SNMP4J when I tried to get / getNext from cisco or dell d
Hello Leonard,
SMI forbids the registration of an OID below another OID (instance
within instance)
and obviously that makes sense. Otherwise, the lexicographic ordering
of objects in an agent could not be implemented without ambiguities.
In your case, the corresponding SMI MIB would have an er
Hi,
Yes, this the example should read as follows:
long sysUpTime = (System.nanoTime() - startTime) / 1000 // 10^-7
I will fix the documentation (that was a regression when replacing
System.currentMillis() with System.nanoTime().
Best regards,
Frank
Am 31.08.2014 15:37, schrieb Mooli Tayer
Hi Ilya,
Can you please provide the stack trace? That will help to identify whether the
problem was caused by the message sender or responder.
How did you provide the OID?
Best regards
Frank
Am 09.08.2014 um 12:41 schrieb Ilya Knyazhansky :
> Hello All,
> When I try to use TableUtils to get the
file had several
errors affecting the MIB structure.
* Improved: Error location of DEFVAL and other unresolved references.
* Added: Full SPPI PIB module checking now available with additional error
messages 6001-6007.
Best regards,
Frank Fock
--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen, Ge
ss.getPort(),
udpAddress.getInetAddress());
Thanks,
Prema
-Original Message-
From: SNMP4J [mailto:snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org] On Behalf Of Frank Fock
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 4:57 PM
To: snmp4j@agentpp.org
Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] renewSocketAfterException() binds to a specific address
Hi P
Hi Prema,
The renewSocketAdterException(..) method of the DefaultUdpTransportMapping
uses *exactly* the same UDP address as provided in the constructor. If you
provided "0.0.0.0", it will be used again.
You wrote that you are using the default constructor. That one is *not*
using
"0.0.0.0", inst
snmp4j-ow...@agentpp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of SNMP4J digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: SNMP4J Digest, Vol 90, Issue 11 (Harsha H R)
2. Re: SNMP4J Digest, Vol
requ...@agentpp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
snmp4j-ow...@agentpp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of SNMP4J digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: TableUtils - STATUS_WRONG_ORDER = -2; endOfMibVie
Hi Harsha,
You will have to write your own TableUtils class to change this behavior.
But careful, there are many buggy agents like yours in the field.
In your case, the bug is harmless (although it violates the standard).
But other agents return lesser OIDs which can cause endless loops.
Theref
ease suggest.
- Thanks,
Narayanarao
On Monday, July 14, 2014 7:53 PM, Frank Fock wrote:
Hi Narayanarao,
Then you have not registered the privacy protocol you are using as
SecurityProtocol
with SecurityProcotols.getInstance().addPrivacyProtocol(..)
Best regards,
Frank
Am 14.07.2014 12:53, schrieb N
,localizationEngineID=80:00:13:70:01:0a:7e:b2:74:61:83:59:98]
-Thanks,
Narayanarao
On Monday, July 14, 2014 1:23 PM, Frank Fock wrote:
Hi Narayanarao,
Which class (with line 101) do you mean?
Could you please also post the line content with some context?
Best regards,
Frank
Am 14.07.2014 09:34, schrieb
ools.console.SnmpRequest.send(SnmpRequest.java:407)
at
org.snmp4j.tools.console.SnmpRequest.main(SnmpRequest.java:1243)
- Thanks
Narayanarao
On Friday, July 11, 2014 8:11 PM, Frank Fock wrote:
Then please check it a third time. There are only two locations where this
error can happ
rnal simulation agent.
* Direct editing of simulation data in the MIB tree.
* Property key selection from configurable template (defaults for
provided code generation templates).
Best regards,
Frank Fock
--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen, Germany
https://agentpp.com
Phone: +49
remains in DefaultUdpTransportMapping ?
Thanks,
Prema
-Original Message-
From: Frank Fock [mailto:f...@agentpp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 4:53 PM
To: Prema Upot; snmp4j@agentpp.org
Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] Socket closed exception
Hi Prema,
Simply call "listen()" on the Transp
reports 40.
Does TrapReceiver need to sync engine boot and engine time with that
of Sender?
Thanks & Regards,
Nithin K J
Quoting Frank Fock :
Hi,
The local USM cache has stored a value of 40. The sender reports 0,
which is less. Therefore the message is being dropped. You will have
to reset
Frank for your reply.
i double checked and privacy pass phrase is set.
could you please let me know if enabling any debugs will help to
narrow down the issue?
-Narayanarao
P.S:- my trap forward code is failing only for 3des privacy protocol.
On Friday, July 11, 2014 12:16 PM, Frank Fock wrote
Hi,
The local USM cache has stored a value of 40. The sender reports 0, which is
less. Therefore the message is being dropped. You will have to reset the cached
value to 0, and then fix the sender to persistently store its own engine boots
counter.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 11.07.2014 um 13:58 sch
Hi,
Please fix the USM settings accoridng to the error message.
You are trying the use a security level that is not supported
by the protocol or by the provided security credentials.
For example if the secLevel is authPriv and you did not provide
a privacy passphrase, you will get this error.
Be
the socket closed in the first instance. We have been running this code for a
few years now and this problem has surfaced only quite recently.
Thanks,
Prema
-Original Message-
From: SNMP4J [mailto:snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org] On Behalf Of Frank Fock
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 2:22 PM
Hi Prema,
Most likely, someone is calling Snmp.close() or the close() method of
the underlying transport mapping
while other code is still using the same Snmp session.
Another option would be the operating system or JRE closing the socket
itself for some reason
(unlikely).
Best regards,
Fran
+ resEvent.getResponse());
}
};
snmp.send(pdu, target, null, listener);
}
Thanks,
Shraddha.
-Original Message-----
From: SNMP4J [mailto:snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org] On Behalf Of Frank Fock
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:53 AM
To:
Hi Shraddha,
Yes, of course. MIB Explorer is based on SNMP4J and its network
discovery engine
is based on SNMP4J.
Use the asynchronous request interface in conjunction with the broadcast
address
and use the cancel method by timeout (and not for each response as usual).
Best regards,
Frank
A
engine
discovery property enabled/disabled.
Thanks & Regards,
Nithin K J
-Original Message-
From: SNMP4J [mailto:snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org] On Behalf Of Frank Fock
Sent: 23 June 2014 21:42
To: snmp4j@agentpp.org
Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] Reg: Not able to receive traps with AuthPriv security
l
Hi,
Most likely, this is an engine ID problem.
Are the engine IDs unique?
Is the authentication/privacy passwords on the receiver site
localized for the engine ID of the sender?
Best regards,
Frank
Am 23.06.2014 14:29, schrieb Nithin Jagadeesh:
Hi,
I am trying to listen the traps from SN
Hi Ladd,
This fix could indeed improve the transport mappings behavior in some
situations!
Thanks for sorting this out.
The getFirst() calling is inefficient, because it takes several loops to
get all keys processed
(they are removed from the list by other code). In the case of a dropped
conn
every 30 seconds.
I will investigate timeout changes tomorrow. Thanks and any more
suggestions always welcome
Regards Nigel
On 19 June 2014 19:30, Frank Fock <mailto:f...@agentpp.com>> wrote:
Hi Nigel,
Your setup is absolutely fine and the recommended one for that task.
Hi Nigel,
Your setup is absolutely fine and the recommended one for that task.
Have you checked that the agent isn't the problem?
Agents (except AGENT++ and SNMP4J-Agent based) are often single
threaded and many do not implement thread safe lexicographic ordering
correctly.
Also check the timeou
scope is compared with the lower bound of the query. Scope
and query
- * are deemd to be equal if both bounds are equal and are both included.
+ * are deemed to be equal if both bounds are equal and both are included.
* Otherwise the scope is deemed to be less than the query.
*
* @author Frank
Hi,
The links are all working (again) now.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 17.06.2014 17:56, schrieb Frank Fock:
Hi,
The 1.x releases have indeed a wrong hash value due to a bug in the then
used Maven 2 which calculated the hash as hash(file+file) instead of
hash(file).
The confluence and jira pages
Hi,
The 1.x releases have indeed a wrong hash value due to a bug in the then
used Maven 2 which calculated the hash as hash(file+file) instead of
hash(file).
The confluence and jira pages have been restored (wrong webserver config).
I am still working on the fix for the mailman and pipermail page
continue to post messages.
Best regards,
Frank Fock
--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen, Germany
https://agentpp.com
Phone: +49 7024 8688230
Fax: +49 7024 8688231
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
http://oosnmp.net/mailman
!
Best regards,
Frank Fock
--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen, Germany
https://agentpp.com
Phone: +49 7024 8688230
Fax: +49 7024 8688231
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://s16675406.onlinehome-server.info/mailman
Am 05.06.2014 23:03, schrieb Ladd:
I see. Was MIB Explorer using a single session instance with a single
TableUtils instance calling the synchronous getTable() to do its queries?
Thanks!!
- Ladd
MIB Explorer uses a single Snmp instance but no TableUtils instance (for
my test).
In any case,
Hi Sajini,
Which "time-stamp" do you mean? A SNMP PDU does not contain
a time-stamp by default.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 06.06.2014 11:05, schrieb Sajini De Silva:
Hi,
I'm new to SNMP4J and I want to get the time-stamp from the SNMP stream. Is
there a way to do it using SNMP4J?
Thank you,
Saji
timed out and the other work without problems (tried
several times).
Best regards,
Frank
Am 05.06.2014 15:45, schrieb Ladd:
Frank Fock writes:
Hi Ladd,
I cannot reproduce the behavior. Even after killing (-15) one of the
agents, the second
still works like a charm with the SNMP4J using
Hi Ladd,
I cannot reproduce the behavior. Even after killing (-15) one of the
agents, the second
still works like a charm with the SNMP4J using Oracle JRE 1.7.0_55 on
Windows 7 SP 1.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 04.06.2014 23:16, schrieb Frank Fock:
Am 04.06.2014 00:54, schrieb Ladd:
Frank
Am 04.06.2014 00:54, schrieb Ladd:
Frank Fock writes:
Hi Ladd,
The exception is logged but catched and does not have a side effect on other
connections (as promised by the Java API). I would suspect a JRE or OS
bug here
(although I cannot exempt an error in SNMP4J at this point).
What JRE
Hi Ladd,
The exception is logged but catched and does not have a side effect on other
connections (as promised by the Java API). I would suspect a JRE or OS
bug here
(although I cannot exempt an error in SNMP4J at this point).
What JRE version and operating system (incl. version) are you usin
Hi Ladd,
Have you set SNMP4J.setForwardRuntimeExceptions(true)?
Then you can set it to "false" to ignore runtime exceptions.
Otherwise, please send me the full stack trace of the exception.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 02.06.2014 19:37, schrieb Ladd:
I’ve got an SNMP manager built with v2.3.0. I’m
(domain agentpp.org) to the new
server is therefore canceled and postponed until June 14th - 15th.
Thank you for your understanding,
Frank Fock
--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen, Germany
https://agentpp.com
Phone: +49 7024 8688230
Fax: +49 7024 8688231
during
this period.
If you have questions or urgent issues, please send them by email to
supp...@agentpp.com.
I will post a message to these mailing lists when the services are up
and running
again.
Thank you for your understanding!
Best regards,
Frank Fock
--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str
Hi,
You could purchase SNMP4J-SMI-PRO to get detailed MIB information at runtime
for the OIDs you are processing. Including the UNITS.
The MIB information is not sent over the wire, thus it has been loaded
at sender
side separately - if needed.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 26.05.2014 05:36, schrieb
.
let me know if you want me to enable any debugs or how can i share the
packet captures(earlier the mail is bounced saying size is large).
Thanks
Narayanarao
On Friday, May 23, 2014 2:41 AM, Frank Fock wrote:
Hi Narayanarao,
There must be an error on your site. I see no reason why GET and
st regards,
Frank Fock
--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen, Germany
https://agentpp.com
Phone: +49 7024 8688230
Fax: +49 7024 8688231
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://s16675406.onlinehome-server.info/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
Hi Iker,
If you need it, you can define/rename it yourself. SNMP4J is open source.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 12.05.2014 20:19, schrieb Iker Almandoz:
HI Frank,
I have noticed that the isFowardRuntimeExceptions was renamed between 1.11.3
and 1.11.5 (same between 2.2.1 and 2.2.2).
This is causing
Hi,
For encryption algorithms using more than 128bit keys (3DES, AES192, and
AES256)
you need to activate strong encryption in the Java Runtime. Please see
Oracle's
documentation on how to do this.
See also the SNMP FAQ at:
https://oosnmp.net/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6651906
B
Hi,
There is probably a recursion from the Log4J initialization that calls
your code with SnmpRequest.
The SnmpRequest class is an example only and should NOT be used
in production code.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 24.04.2014 22:00, schrieb darrick:
This is a really bizarre issue. I'm trying to upg
Thank you very much.
Best Regards,
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Frank Fock <mailto:f...@agentpp.com>> wrote:
Hi,
There is no "correct" maxRepetitions. Any value is "correct".
The agent decides how many repetitions it will provide based on
l
Hi John,
Please see my answers inline below:
Am 03.04.2014 18:43, schrieb John Money:
Hi Frank,
Thank you for the great framework! I have been using snmp4j to communicate
with several devices using v3 with authPriv. Recently, I came across a
scenario where 10 of the devices I am querying have
Hi,
There is no "correct" maxRepetitions. Any value is "correct".
The agent decides how many repetitions it will provide based on
local contraints and measures. Some agent never return more
than one, others up to the maximum packet size, others by
timing constraints.
Thus, you can never know how
Hi,
The engineBoots counter is set when you create the USM. See
http://www.snmp4j.org/doc/org/snmp4j/security/USM.html#USM(org.snmp4j.security.SecurityProtocols,
org.snmp4j.smi.OctetString, int)
Best regards,
Frank
Am 27.03.2014 07:20, schrieb Prathib Kumar:
Hi Frank/ All,
In our applica
Hi Peter,
SNMP4J uses the full 8bit per byte provided to the passwordToKey method call
as an OctetString passphrase. Thus, no character conversion is done within
SNMP4J. You have thus the full control how your password is converted into
an OctetString (bytes) from a character string.
If you use t
Hi Samuel,
Have you read the SNMP4J-Agent-Instrumentation-Guide PDF yet?
It can be applied 1:1 to SNMP4J-AgentX master and sub-agent
instrumentation as well. Only if you want to use AgentX shared tables,
you need to do additional work on index/region allocation.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 21.03.20
th bulk data loading into MOMutableTableModel
(VIKRAM MODUGU)
3. Re: Issue with bulk data loading into MOMutableTableModel
(Frank Fock)
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:47:10 +
From: VIKRAM MODUGU
To: &quo
Hi,
What do you mean with "crashing" exactly?
Is an exception being thrown?
Does the agent hang (i.e. not responding anymore)?
Best regards,
Frank
Am 14.03.2014 13:07, schrieb VIKRAM MODUGU:
Hello Helpdesk,
With this load the snmp agent is crashing repeatedly.
Thanks,
Vikram Modugu.
From: V
Hi,
You can simply append the password again.
If your password is "1234" you provide "12341234"
which has 8 characters but has the same key than "1234".
Best regards,
Frank
Am 13.03.2014 21:51, schrieb Tal Kapon:
Hi all ,
I am using SNMP4J in order to query network equipment.
Cisco switc
201 - 300 of 1071 matches
Mail list logo
