Seems to work.
Keith
- Original Message -
From: Wallace M. Klinck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:20 AM
Subject: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Testing ability to post a message.
Testing ability to post a message--having difficulties.
Wally
...our democratic political process has not been able
to correct the 3% of GDP shortage of purchasing
power, the 2.3%/year natural rate of inflation, and
the 4% to 10% unemployment rates which the US economy
has suffered for more than a century.
-
These percentages
Bill, you are confusing me. On several occasions you have spoken of a
ticket, suggeseting that some form of direct disibursement to citizens
should be linked to particular consumables--e.g. medical care, while at the
same time dumping on a generalized cash disbursement like Basic Income as
I sure wish someone would answer the question in the Subject line of this
thread. I thought myself fairly sophisticated, for a layman, about things
economic, until I attempted to get my arms around Douglas's theory. I have
an intuition that there is something valuable in all of this, but I have
John, you mioght look at my commment of August 4, and try the same text as I
did.
Keith
- Original Message -
From: John Médaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] What is Social Credit?
I sure wish someone would
(Michael Bindner wrote:-) Don't get me wrong, people will take the national dividend. The resentment will come from those who still work while there are others who do not have to. This comment is more directed to another alternative - Capital Homesteading - than to social credit.
I am a big
Thanks, Vic, for setting the psoition out so clearly.
Jessop.
-
On Thursday 14 Aug 2003 10:58 am, you wrote:
The following has been forwarded to me with a request from Vic Bridger
that I try to post it, inasmuch that for some reason his messages have
been bouncing from
My message did not contain those words, the commentary on my message did.
I agree with the many authors who say do social credit, capital homesteading and a higher Earned Income Tax Credit (Basic Income) - although I would make employee-owned firms rather than households eligible to borrow at
Received in South Africa, loud and clear :-)
Jessop.
--
On Wednesday 13 Aug 2003 10:20 am, you wrote:
Testing ability to post a message--having difficulties.
Wally
--^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Testing ability to post a message--having difficulties.
Wally
--^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84IaC.bcVIgP.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA -
Under the system I propose, those not working would be those who retired, so there would be no resentment factor.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Michael Bindner wrote:-) Don't get me wrong, people will take the national dividend. The resentment will come from those who still work while there are others
This gets to something I tried to propose as a discussion topic, although I think technical difficulties prevented the discussion:
Can change happen without campaign finance reform?
I have some proposals on this topic on my web page at http://www.iowafiscalequity.net/elections.html
Which I
In the attempt to understand what the cartalists
(Mosler) are trying to say, I've appended a stylized
diagram depicting the macro economy from the
creditary perspective. T1 represents the period of
credit expansion; T2 the period of steady state; and
T3 the period of contraction.
[Jessop wrote:-] Without now going into too much detail, I have spent a good deal of my
life as an evangelical Christian leading people to Christ. That is my life.
But when it comes to social and economics issues, I try to avoid as much as
possible all religious or sectarian language and
14 matches
Mail list logo
