Since posting my longish attachment in response to
Victor's clarification about individuals versus the powerful group, I have been
reading the results of Google searches on the names of Ezra Pound and Alexander
Del Mar. As a consequence I now know that Pound got his ideas about money
and
On Thursday 28 Aug 2003 8:24 pm, William wrote:
It is the reverse of a sales tax
except it is not charged against tax collections but
is charged against the National Credit Account.
---
Jessop here:- The National Credit Account could simply pay an amount over to
Revenue to
This is not a direct answer to your question, but
it may have some bearing on its origin.
In The Grip of Death, pp. 260-61,
Michael Rowbotham says:
...since 1963 cash currency in the UKmoney stock
has declined from 21% to 3%.Why should this mean that the difference
should be made up by
Inserted comments [comments 08-29] below:
--
On Thursday 28 Aug 2003 8:24 pm, William wrote:
It is the reverse of a sales tax
except it is not charged against tax collections
but
is charged against the National Credit Account.
---
Jessop here:- The National Credit Account
I assure you, the incomes of the rich are increasing. Their taxes could be raised in order to pay off the national debt.
By government profit, I do mean a surplus - although profit is the correct term if social services and education are spun off to faith based organizations and income
I am curious, would you suggest that things such as
education and social services should be allowed to beassumed byfaith
based organizations and that it would be a good thing?
I would suggest that if we use the present faith based
organizations as an examplethis concept could not be
Eighty-five years ago Douglas was using the three
percent figure--but then there were still some actual
gold sovereigns in circulation. It's probably far
less than that today unless you count the Fed
accommodation of some portion of the federal debt
as government money which might (or might
The United States government only gets credit
to its account for the face value of the coinage it
delivers to the Fed. It gets credit only for the
cost of printing the notes it delivers. I keep
reading in the crank literature (COMER, Rowbotham,
etc.) that in Canada and Britain government
