RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] farewell

2003-11-18 Thread william_b_ryan
Brief comments inserted: -- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:19:36 +0800 From: Pat Gunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] farewell Thanks, Bill. That is what I needed to hear. Of course, I said nothing about a money multiplier. -- [Insert] You did

Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] farewell

2003-11-17 Thread Pat Gunning
Thanks, Bill. That is what I needed to hear. Of course, I said nothing about a money multiplier. What I said was clear and I said it more than once on the list. The Federal Reserve System (Fed) -- that is, the central bank of the U.S. -- regulates the banking system. By this power it can and

Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] farewell

2003-06-25 Thread ekkirion
And now we have Ekky--who you didn't list among your supporters--promoting "monetary reformers" like Bernard Lietaer, who is in fact a leading Gesellist-- as examples that social crediters should follow. (Bill). Who you have not listed and described is yourself, Bill. So, I'll assume

RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] farewell

2003-06-24 Thread william_b_ryan
The problem, Michael, is that you were probably on the wrong list from the beginning. Your municipal social credit scheme is simply a variation of sovietism as advocated by Lenin, Trotsky, et al. which they practiced before and after the October revolution till Stalin came along. So it's

Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] farewell

2003-06-24 Thread Keith Wilde
I am distressed by Michael's decision to leave, and regret that he has been offended. And contrary to his suggestion that I "replied in a parable", I don't believe that I have replied at all until now. My excuse is that I have been preoccupied for several weeks with my personal health and