On 10/12/2011 08:57 PM, David Miller wrote:
...
linux-can has been created
Great, thanks.
Wolfgang.
___
Socketcan-core mailing list
Socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
Am 12.10.2011 20:34, schrieb Oliver Hartkopp:
On 10/06/11 11:17, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
- this way everything is in one place which is very handy for new developers
and users
A one place solution has advantages but I would prefer SourceForge or
GNU Savanna.
According to
Hi Oliver,
over night, while I was sleeping, the mailing list moved :-), let's go
ahead finding a new home for the can-utils, kernel-out-of-tree and maybe
libsocketcan...
On 10/12/2011 08:34 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
On 10/06/11 11:17, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
- this way everything is
Hi,
On 10/06/2011 02:13 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:36:08AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/06/2011 11:26 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
2. 'can-utils' containing the content of the current SVN
- use the integrated wiki functionality of GitHub for documentation (
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:59:36PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hi,
OK, let's start with the mailing lists. I think there is consensus to
move to a list named linux-can on vger.kernel.org. Any objections?
IMHO socketcan may be better than linux-can.
Anyhow, I will object linux-can
On 10/12/2011 02:59 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
[...]
OK, let's start with the mailing lists. I think there is consensus to
move to a list named linux-can on vger.kernel.org. Any objections?
go ahead!
BTW: what is the procedure to get such a mailing list, e.g. whom should
we
On 10/06/11 11:17, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
- this way everything is in one place which is very handy for new developers
and users
A one place solution has advantages but I would prefer SourceForge or
GNU Savanna.
According to
From: Yegor Yefremov yegor_s...@visionsystems.de
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:06:58 +0200
Am 12.10.2011 14:59, schrieb Wolfgang Grandegger:
Hi,
On 10/06/2011 02:13 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:36:08AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/06/2011 11:26 AM, Yegor
Hi Jan-Niklas,
On 10/05/2011 01:17 PM, Jan-Niklas Meier wrote:
I am watching the SocketCAN project from a user point of view and if I
wouldn't have known some people like Oliver who explained all the cool
features to me I probably never would have used SocketCAN.
I think it is good that
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:36:08AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/06/2011 11:26 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
2. 'can-utils' containing the content of the current SVN
- use the integrated wiki functionality of GitHub for documentation (
https://github.com/features/projects/wikis)
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 02:54:32PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
- kernel.org
- SourceForge
- Gitorious
- Github
The latter two don't provide mailing-lists. kernel.org would emphasize the
official status of SocketCAN.
Ah, you are right. Also
- GNU Savannah
might be a
On 10/04/11 18:38, Robert Schwebel wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 06:20:43PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
I'd vote for kernel.org. Taken the recent issues aside, it is the
central ressource where people search for mainline related code.
But, AFAIK, it's not good for a team of
12 matches
Mail list logo
