Hi, On 10/06/2011 02:13 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:36:08AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> On 10/06/2011 11:26 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote: >>>>> 2. 'can-utils' containing the content of the current SVN >>>>> >>>>> - use the integrated wiki functionality of GitHub for documentation ( >>>>> https://github.com/features/projects/wikis) >>>> >>>> Do we need a separate project to handle the kernel and utilities? >>> >>> I'm for separation of the kernel and utilities, so that distro maintainers >>> can pick the latest package and include it in their software repos. As you >>> say, kernel repo is mainly interesting for backward compatibility. >>> can-utils should get version number and man pages. >> >> I was thinking about different repositories under the same project. >> > Any of both solutions imply a seperation of tools & kernel code. Good!
OK, let's start with the mailing lists. I think there is consensus to move to a list named "linux-can" on "vger.kernel.org". Any objections? BTW: what is the procedure to get such a mailing list, e.g. whom should we contact? Unfortunately, I did not find any useful link on the internet. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list Socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
