Analog Device Samples (was RE: [soft_radio] Oscillator, why divide/4)

2008-02-09 Thread Dave Wade
: 09 February 2008 12:15 To: soft_radio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [soft_radio] Oscillator, why divide/4 - Original Message - From: Dave Wade Having read these I was wondering why these folks use the divide/4 approach when there are now DDS chips available very cheaply, Now, but any

Re: Analog Device Samples (was RE: [soft_radio] Oscillator, why divide/4)

2008-02-09 Thread Alan
Dave, Thanks for the info. And thanks to Alberto for your explanation, I am constantly amazed by the image rejection achieved by my Softrock. 73 Alan G4ZFQ

RE: [soft_radio] Oscillator, why divide/4

2008-02-09 Thread S. Cash Olsen
: soft_radio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miura Kazunori Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 5:04 AM To: soft_radio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [soft_radio] Oscillator, why divide/4 Hello It is important for QSD/QSE to keep a phase difference of 90 degrees precisely.I made

RE: [soft_radio] Oscillator, why divide/4

2008-02-09 Thread k5nwa
At 12:35 PM 2/9/2008, you wrote: Miura, I have a few questions. 1) how do you establish and maintain quadrature offset in phase between the two DDS chips? 2) are you aware that the square wave outputs have a much higher phase jitter than you would get by using a compatitor on the sine or

Re: [soft_radio] Oscillator, why divide/4

2008-02-09 Thread Miura Kazunori
Hello S. Cash Olsen : I have a few questions. 1) how do you establish and maintain quadrature offset in phase between the two DDS chips? using same clock into two DDS chip and make 90 degrees shift by command. 2) are you aware that the square wave outputs have a much higher phase