** **
** **
** **
** **
** **
*From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Meng-Yang Lu
*Sent:* Monday, August 20, 2012 11:56 AM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Graphic card for a workstation again
@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Graphic card for a workstation again
** **
So glad I asked. Hahaha. I knew your thorough personality yields the
best answers. Thanks much!
** **
-Lu
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Matt Lind ml...@carbinestudios.com
wrote
stability.
Framerate isn't everything, stability often matters more.
Matt
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Mirko Jankovic
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:30 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Graphic card
: Graphic card for a workstation again
** **
Maybe it is so but it still doesn't change the fact that after replacing
gtx580 with radeon7970 I got HUGE improvement in frame rates in viewport
and no problems at all as well :)
It seems that all new gtx cards after 280 are crippled
, August 17, 2012 10:30 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.commailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Graphic card for a workstation again
Maybe it is so but it still doesn't change the fact that after replacing gtx580
with radeon7970 I got HUGE improvement in frame rates in viewport
.
** **
** **
Matt
** **
** **
** **
*From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Meng-Yang Lu
*Sent:* Monday, August 20, 2012 11:37 AM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Graphic card for a workstation again
We have the 560Ti and it works fine with Softimage.
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Meng-Yang Lu
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 2:56 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Graphic card for a workstation again
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of
*Meng-Yang Lu
*Sent:* Monday, August 20, 2012 2:56 PM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Graphic card for a workstation again
So glad I asked. Hahaha. I knew your thorough personality yields the
best answers
@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Graphic card for a workstation again
Hi Marc,
Thanks, I think that is what I will go with, off hand would you know what brand
it is, Asus, Msi, PNY, EVGA, Galaxy etc?
Leoung
On 8/20/2012 3:17 PM, Marc-Andre Carbonneau wrote:
We have the 560Ti and it works fine
So...does that mean some of that tech (something similar to PantaRay for
example) will find it's way into SI soon, therefore the reason to buy
Nvidia? :-)
On 8/17/2012 10:51 PM, Chris Chia wrote:
Nah Ben, that's not the reason! ;)
I think Nvidia research has spent a lot of effort in
for any professional DCC
application.
my 2 cents.
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Matt Lind
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 20:23
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Graphic card for a workstation again
...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Meng-Yang Lu
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 11:56 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Graphic card for a workstation again
So glad I asked. Hahaha. I knew your thorough personality yields the best
answers. Thanks much!
-Lu
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Matt
Trying to decide on a graphic card for a workstation.
I was doing some research, there is suppose to be a good discussion in
the XSIbase forum but the site comes up with a virus warning.
Any thought on the list of cards?. Normally I would stay with the Nvidia
but I have read good things about
I always go here for GPU and CPU benchmarks. It is great because they
also have the price/performance ratio:
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html
-ben
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Leoung O'Young digim...@digimata.com wrote:
Trying to decide on a graphic card for a
A lot of people that were testing on XSIbase were getting drastically
better performance from the ATI cards (about 2x-3x) and the point
selection problem seemed to be gone. The latest Nvidia GTX cards (after
the 2xx series) seem to be intentionally hobbled. The conclusion on the
XSIbase
Hi Len, thanks for your input.
On 8/17/2012 3:24 PM, Len Krenzler wrote:
A lot of people that were testing on XSIbase were getting drastically
better performance from the ATI cards (about 2x-3x) and the point
selection problem seemed to be gone. The latest Nvidia GTX cards
(after the 2xx
No issues here. I was one of radeon 7970 testers and can confirm all the
best about it.
I replaced gtx 580 where I had with an script (rotating cube 831x800x800
subdivs in full screen shaded) approx 17fps and after like 30 esec of
rotation goin gup to 80fps,
and right after I replaced it with
Hi Mirko,
What brand name Radeon 7970 do you have?
Thanks,
Leoung
On 8/17/2012 3:47 PM, Mirko Jankovic wrote:
No issues here. I was one of radeon 7970 testers and can confirm all
the best about it.
I replaced gtx 580 where I had with an script (rotating cube
831x800x800 subdivs in full
...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Mirko Jankovic
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 21:47
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Graphic card for a workstation again
No issues here. I was one of radeon 7970 testers and can confirm all the
best about it.
I
http://www.guru3d.com/news/gigabyte-radeon-hd-7970-oc-windforce-review/
Sorry for link to review but forgot full model number to look for it on
gigabyte page.
That is card.
No glitches at all, I usually have main screen middle monitor ofc,
animation editor on right and bunch of other smaller
Also if you are interested here are some OpenCL results between gtx680 and
ati 7970:
Originally Posted by *Raycat*
I ran the Luxmark 2.0 Open CL benchmark. These are the results on my AsUs
GTX 680 2 GB (NOT OC'ed):
Room: 275
Sala: 605
Luxball HDR: 3925
Luxball: 689
Luxball Sky: 2358
Luxmark 2.0
with 500+ objects I see no difference between this radeon and
285.
if you have any specific glitchbug to test let me know, Ill check if its
present.
From: Sven Constable
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:06 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Graphic card for a workstation again
Hi
and ati7870...
lux gpu only
Room: 767
Sala: 1333
Luxball HDR: 10917
Luxball: 1505
Luxball Sky: 4829
From: Mirko Jankovic
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:27 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Graphic card for a workstation again
Also if you are interested here are some OpenCL
I would personally choose Nvidia over ATI... ;)
Chris
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 3:24 AM, Len Krenzler
l...@creativecontrol.camailto:l...@creativecontrol.ca wrote:
A lot of people that were testing on XSIbase were getting drastically better
performance from the ATI cards (about 2x-3x) and the point
Any reason for that kind of personal preference, when all tests shows that
nvidia is staying in the dust behind ati?
btw talking about gaming cards here, not overpriced quadros :) If someone
else was buying and not interested in budget then fine but when waging
performance / price wise
as
Chris Chia and I think a few others in the Singapore Softimage team
are ex-NVIDIA guys. ;-)
-ben
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Mirko Jankovic
mirko.janko...@aeonproduction.com wrote:
Any reason for that kind of personal preference, when all tests shows that
nvidia is staying in the dust
Nah Ben, that's not the reason! ;)
I think Nvidia research has spent a lot of effort in understanding what the
production studios really need... Take a look at this interesting article:
http://www.nvidia.com/object/wetadigital_avatar.html
Chris
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Ben Houston
Maybe it is so but it still doesn't change the fact that after replacing
gtx580 with radeon7970 I got HUGE improvement in frame rates in viewport
and no problems at all as well :)
It seems that all new gtx cards after 280 are crippled in an effort to push
overpriced quadros.
But ofc we need to
28 matches
Mail list logo
